lgfualol Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 Would be alright there imo. We'd be stuck with Ulloa though which would not be ideal.
SpacedX Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 1 minute ago, Abrasive fox said: I am volunterring to drive him. ...Wrong place, see clichés in football thread. 1
Greg2607 Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 Carroll, crouch and now slimani?!? Surely Chelsea can do better than those 3 as choices!!?!?
foxfanazer Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 17 minutes ago, lgfualol said: Would be alright there imo. We'd be stuck with Ulloa though which would not be ideal. Why would we? We’re not obliged to have a big useless lump in our squad ya know
lgfualol Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 38 minutes ago, foxfanazer said: Why would we? We’re not obliged to have a big useless lump in our squad ya know Who are we going to nob the ball at if we need a late winner
HybridFox Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 Annoying this is he'll probably do well there 1
brucey Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 Everyone was laughing at West Ham for doing this exact thing 2 summers ago. WTF are chelsea up to?
st albans fox Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 can’t believe Leo hasn’t been linked. Iborra is tall aswell!
foxfanazer Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 15 minutes ago, lgfualol said: Who are we going to nob the ball at if we need a late winner Send big H up like we used to with Walsh and Elliot 1
Foxhateram Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 They'll be bitterly disappointed if they buy him as a target man. He is awful at holding up the ball, has the first touch of a sunday league player and very rarely wins aerial battles. Whoops I mean he's great, better than Crouch and Carroll for sure!!
Ashley Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 4 hours ago, Tuna said: Sensible move, they need a target man and Slim is unfortunately surplus to requirements here. I like Slim and thought he'd turned the corner in the Huddersfield game, but he was desperately poor in the Fleetwood games. We'll rip Chelsea off with a loan fee which is always good for a laugh. Reeks of desperation from Chelsea though !!! Poor in the Fleetwood games with what service?
foxfanazer Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 1 minute ago, Ashley said: Poor in the Fleetwood games with what service? What service is he gonna get with his back to goal constantly?
Ashley Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 3 minutes ago, foxfanazer said: What service is he gonna get with his back to goal constantly? He can play target man quite easily did well at Sporting doing it... but still the bloke needs service and he didnt get it in any of the games. Hes a easy scape goat for some. 1
foxfanazer Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 1 minute ago, Ashley said: He can play target man quite easily did well at Sporting doing it... but still the bloke needs service and he didnt get it in any of the games. Hes a easy scape goat for some. Iheanacho was playing too but actually made some movement to receive the ball
Redouane Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 2 hours ago, brucey said: Everyone was laughing at West Ham for doing this exact thing 2 summers ago. WTF are chelsea up to? Maybe someone's pretending to be Conte on WhatsApp 1
Nick Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 Ambromovich wants English players for the squad but doesn’t want to spend big until his new manager arrives in the summer.
bluesbrothers Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 We're theoretically able to catch Chelsea, even if it's a massive ask at this point. Why the hell would we loan them one of our players, fringe or not, to help them consolidate a spot we probably won't get but still want? Selling is one thing - it's a final thing - but if you're on loan, you have to be able to go back to the parent club at a moment's notice if required. We could do without any split loyalties if there's an outside chance of top 4 at their expense, as farfetched as that scenario may be.
Gerard Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 1 minute ago, bluesbrothers said: We're theoretically able to catch Chelsea, even if it's a massive ask at this point. Why the hell would we loan them one of our players, fringe or not, to help them consolidate a spot we probably won't get but still want? Selling is one thing - it's a final thing - but if you're on loan, you have to be able to go back to the parent club at a moment's notice if required. We could do without any split loyalties if there's an outside chance of top 4 at their expense, as farfetched as that scenario may be. Behave, even if we won our last 14 games we'd still be 50/50 at best on catching Chelsea. What is it with our fans thinking after a win we'll be getting into the top six? 2
Bluetintedspecs Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 (edited) 39 minutes ago, Gerard said: Behave, even if we won our last 14 games we'd still be 50/50 at best on catching Chelsea. What is it with our fans thinking after a win we'll be getting into the top six? Its the beauty of being a football fan....stop pissing on those positive chips Edited 21 January 2018 by Bluetintedspecs
st albans fox Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 3 minutes ago, Bluetintedspecs said: Its the beauty of being a football fan....stop pissing on those positive chips There’s being positive and there’s being plain nuts. Nurse !!!!!! 2
The Quick Brown Fox Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 4 hours ago, Foxhateram said: They'll be bitterly disappointed if they buy him as a target man. He is awful at holding up the ball, has the first touch of a sunday league player and very rarely wins aerial battles. Whoops I mean he's great, better than Crouch and Carroll for sure!! I think that's being pretty harsh on Sunday league players. 1
ARM1968 Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 Chelsea want Slim but he’s not good enough for us!! WHAT?
Raw Dykes Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 29 minutes ago, ARM1968 said: Chelsea want Slim but he’s not good enough for us!! WHAT? He's not good enough for them, either. They just don't know it yet.
Guest the fox Posted 21 January 2018 Posted 21 January 2018 ghezzal plus 10 million for slimani (deal with monaco) won't be bad at all
Recommended Posts