Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Max Wall said:

So. Has Puel completely changed his philosophy overnight or does this just prove that every game is completely different and he hasn't insisted they be boring at all costs?

Or maybe the team have decided to completely go against his wishes.

THe team are fully behind Puel, I think he knows Watford are a possession team so has decided with faster movement and direct style which suits us 

  • Like 4
Posted
Just now, Max Wall said:

So. Has Puel completely changed his philosophy overnight or does this just prove that every game is completely different and he hasn't insisted they be boring at all costs?

Or maybe the team have decided to completely go against his wishes.

I don't think Puel will have changed too much, he's not someone who strikes me as open to other ideas. I'm guessing it's a case of Watford playing into our hands with them pushing up, and dominating possession it gives us less chance to pass the ball sideways so we make the incisive passes. 

 

If Puel wants to play his possession crap, he should have had a creative midfielder top of his summer wishlist because none of these players bar Albrighton and maddison have a defence splitting pass in them. 

Posted
Just now, foxes_rule1978 said:

THe team are fully behind Puel, I think he knows Watford are a possession team so has decided with faster movement and direct style which suits us 

100% agree 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, BrokenRecord said:

Wait, we aren't dominating possession and yet we're winning? That can't be right! 

It's so cold out, pffff global warming my bum!

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, BrokenRecord said:

I don't think Puel will have changed too much, he's not someone who strikes me as open to other ideas. I'm guessing it's a case of Watford playing into our hands with them pushing up, and dominating possession it gives us less chance to pass the ball sideways so we make the incisive passes. 

 

If Puel wants to play his possession crap, he should have had a creative midfielder top of his summer wishlist because none of these players bar Albrighton and maddison have a defence splitting pass in them. 

Really living up to your name - I don’t think maintaining possession is a problem!

Edited by UPinCarolina
Posted
Just now, BrokenRecord said:

I don't think Puel will have changed too much, he's not someone who strikes me as open to other ideas. I'm guessing it's a case of Watford playing into our hands with them pushing up, and dominating possession it gives us less chance to pass the ball sideways so we make the incisive passes. 

 

If Puel wants to play his possession crap, he should have had a creative midfielder top of his summer wishlist because none of these players bar Albrighton and maddison have a defence splitting pass in them. 

I'm sorry but that is pretty ridiculous. That's as good as saying it's Puel's fault when we don't win yet it's nothing to do with him if we do. I just don't agree with that.

Posted
3 minutes ago, foxes_rule1978 said:

THe team are fully behind Puel, I think he knows Watford are a possession team so has decided with faster movement and direct style which suits us 

They're not really a possession team, their success earlier in the season was a direct countering 442

Posted
4 minutes ago, RumbleFox said:

FT when we have loads of possession and shots but lose:

 

"It's scoring that counts, all this tippy tappy bullshit means nothing.  Stats mean nothing".

 

FT when the opposition have loads of possession and shots but lose:

 

"We are lucky, they deserve to be winning".

 

X

More bollox x 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...