treer 298 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 (edited) Edited 7 October 2019 by treer Quote Link to post Share on other sites
weller54 9,343 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Soft.. But was always going to be given. End of. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dahnsouff 5,753 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Think he is referring to the encroachment Quote Link to post Share on other sites
urban.spaceman 32,423 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Thanks John x 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Manwell Pablo 5,486 Posted 7 October 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Great. Send it to the Premier League I am sure they will order an immediate replay. 2 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ThaiFox 945 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Sky sports app, Demot Gallaher's ref watch, thought it was the right decision, although soft. He also agreed with the yellow for Hamza but added Hamza did not deserve a red. Anyway, it's done now. We lost, they won, it's over and there's nothing we can do to chance that decision or result. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Facecloth 13,333 Posted 7 October 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 (edited) The premier league said at the start of the season that encroachment wouldn't be punished unless the player came into play. So when Rice was playing for West Ham and managed to clear a saved penalty after encroaching, then it was ordered to be retaken, had he not got to ball it wouldn't have been retaken. Had one of the Liverpool players that encroached scored a rebound then it would have been ruled out, but otherwise it's let go. Edited 7 October 2019 by Facecloth 10 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Horse's Mouth 2,811 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Get a grip Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Manwell Pablo 5,486 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Just now, ThaiFox said: Sky sports app, Demot Gallaher's ref watch, thought it was the right decision, although soft. He also agreed with the yellow for Hamza but added Hamza did not deserve a red. Anyway, it's done now. We lost, they won, it's over and there's nothing we can do to chance that decision or result. He's on about encroachment. Quite pathetic really. I think every penalty take in the last 25 years has been encroached. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RoboFox 3,986 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Decent amount of Bitcoin, there. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TiffToff88 2,561 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 But it did stand, and we lost. Luckily we play again A week on Saturday, and then another 29 times after that before the end of the season. Sometimes decisions go against us, sometimes they go in our favour. I won't lose sleep over the fact that we lost to the European Champions away from home Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Manwell Pablo 5,486 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Just now, Facecloth said: The premier league said at the start of the season that encroachment wouldn't be punished unless the player came into play. So when Rice was playing for West Ham and managed to clear a saved penalty after encroaching, then it was ordered to be retaken. Had one of the Liverpool players that encroached scored a rebound then it would have been ruled out, but otherwise it's let go. There we go close thread Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Hammo 1,728 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 (edited) As if that ref was going to demand a retake for encroachment. It might have been a different matter of course if Kasper had saved it... Edited 7 October 2019 by Hammo 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dahnsouff 5,753 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Come on folks, let’s not go all Victim-pool here. Looking on RAWK makes me actually quite sad 😔 Being partisan is quite usual but refusing to watch MOTD or listen to other viewpoints is just sad. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ThaiFox 945 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 7 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said: He's on about encroachment. Quite pathetic really. I think every penalty take in the last 25 years has been encroached. Yes, I got that, but thought I'd add that very important information! 6 minutes ago, Hammo said: As if that ref was going to demand a retake for encroachment. It might have been a different matter of course if Kasper had saved it... If Kasper had saved it there would have been a retake for something. Off his line, encroachment or Klopp cleaning his teeth. Any excuse would have done! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
treer 298 Posted 7 October 2019 Author Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 15 minutes ago, Facecloth said: The premier league said at the start of the season that encroachment wouldn't be punished unless the player came into play. So when Rice was playing for West Ham and managed to clear a saved penalty after encroaching, then it was ordered to be retaken, had he not got to ball it wouldn't have been retaken. Had one of the Liverpool players that encroached scored a rebound then it would have been ruled out, but otherwise it's let go. 2019/2020 rules, don't know how you have come up with that twaddle The players other than the kicker and goalkeeper must be: • at least 9.15 m (10 yds) from the penalty mark • behind the penalty mark • inside the field of play • outside the penalty area 2. Offences and sanctions Once the referee has signalled for a penalty kick to be taken, the kick must be taken; if it is not taken the referee may take disciplinary action before signalling again for the kick to be taken. If, before the ball is in play, one of the following occurs: • the player taking the penalty kick or a team-mate offends: • if the ball enters the goal, the kick is retaken • Quote Link to post Share on other sites
UniFox21 7,486 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Why are we still banging on about this? It was given, we lost the game. Pundits have all had their say and think Mane dived and bought the penalty. VAR didn't overall due to it not being an obvious error. Just move on instead of pulling every tiny detail of why it shouldn't have been given. And did we really need a separate thread for this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Foxxed 4,280 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Let it go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Jonezy 642 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dorkingfox 371 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 9 minutes ago, UniFox21 said: Why are we still banging on about this? It was given, we lost the game. Pundits have all had their say and think Mane dived and bought the penalty. VAR didn't overall due to it not being an obvious error. Just move on instead of pulling every tiny detail of why it shouldn't have been given. And did we really need a separate thread for this? It is what supporters do, whole point of being a supporter, get fed up, recover, start new topic then move on. Problem here is the next match is ages away. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
UniFox21 7,486 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Just now, Dorkingfox said: It is what supporters do, whole point of being a supporter, get fed up, recover, start new topic then move on. Problem here is the next match is ages away. Problem on here is people take things too far searching for the answer they want, rather than the 'correct' answer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
treer 298 Posted 7 October 2019 Author Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 8 minutes ago, UniFox21 said: Why are we still banging on about this? It was given, we lost the game. Pundits have all had their say and think Mane dived and bought the penalty. VAR didn't overall due to it not being an obvious error. Just move on instead of pulling every tiny detail of why it shouldn't have been given. And did we really need a separate thread for this? the thread is about the penalty goal, not the decision to award the customary anfield pen Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dahnsouff 5,753 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 1 minute ago, Dorkingfox said: It is what supporters do, whole point of being a supporter, get fed up, recover, start new topic then move on. Problem here is the next match is ages away. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post Sol thewall Bamba 8,058 Posted 7 October 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 Getting a bit desperate now lads. 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
UniFox21 7,486 Posted 7 October 2019 Report Share Posted 7 October 2019 1 minute ago, treer said: the thread is about the penalty goal, not the decision to award the customary anfield pen The thread didn't need to be a thing, this could've been put in the existing post match thread. Encroachment won't get a penalty re-taken unless the encroaching player scores or clears the ball. As we've seen already in the prem this season. Finding rules as to why penalty goal was wrong will do nothing but annoy people further, it can't change the awarding of the goal. The team moves on and learns from it's mistakes. The end, close thread. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.