Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, Izzy said:

It’s our silver wedding anniversary today and we’ve been together 30 years - more than half my life. Not really how I saw things panning out when I was younger :unsure:

My condolences 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Izzy said:

It’s our silver wedding anniversary today and we’ve been together 30 years - more than half my life. Not really how I saw things panning out when I was younger :unsure:

I hope you didn't compile this post while you were waiting for your meals to arrive at your celebratory meal out together?

Edited by Free Falling Foxes
Posted
2 hours ago, Izzy said:

It’s our silver wedding anniversary today and we’ve been together 30 years - more than half my life. Not really how I saw things panning out when I was younger :unsure:

I’m glad this didn’t get its own thread 😄

 

you both deserve a medal 

We’re  soon to reach 34 years - any more will be a bloody miracle!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Izzy said:

It’s our silver wedding anniversary today and we’ve been together 30 years - more than half my life. Not really how I saw things panning out when I was younger :unsure:

 

20 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

I’m glad this didn’t get its own thread 😄

 

you both deserve a medal 

We’re  soon to reach 34 years - any more will be a bloody miracle!

You're virtually newly weds compared to me and Mrs. FFF.

Reminds me of a chat with some work colleagues that had turned into a discussion about how many different partners we had slept with. This chat even included a couple of women.

I kept quiet. 

If all their stories were true and could be equated into a league table, I would have been mathematically relegated by Christmas.

That said, I have a theory . 

Ask a male how many partners they've had and they'll double it.

Ask a female, and they'll halve it.

Edited by Free Falling Foxes
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Izzy said:

It’s our silver wedding anniversary today and we’ve been together 30 years - more than half my life. Not really how I saw things panning out when I was younger :unsure:

Congrats. A very nice milestone to hit. Hope you both have a good evening. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Izzy said:

It’s our silver wedding anniversary today and we’ve been together 30 years - more than half my life. Not really how I saw things panning out when I was younger :unsure:

And they said it wouldn't last!

 

Congratulations.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Have you heard the record breaking no. 1?

 

Demise of the monoculture: why so many have never heard UK’s record-breaking No 1 single | UK charts | The Guardian

 

https://share.google/q8EiL05l5z111Pns4

 

I don't think I have, certainly not knowingly. 

 

The article is very interesting, how streaming just narrows people's musical taste because the algorithm just gives them more of the same.

 

For me, that's just boring. I'm in my late 50s and I still want to hear new music over an array of genres.

 

It's also something I've noticed when watching Pointless. When they have rounds about music frequently present day songs and artist are obscure answers - they're not as well remembered as music from pre-streaming times and when music shows we're on free to air TV that everyone watched.

 

The internet should have opened up new worlds to everyone, but the commercialisation of it has resulted in fracturing people into groups who are just fed more of the same, be that music or, more concerningly, opinions.

Edited by Trav Le Bleu
  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Finnegan said:

... Is Amanda Knox seriously launching a stand up career off of getting away with murder? And bringing it to the victim's country? And calling it a tribute? And promoting it by saying the victim would have found it funny? 

 

I mean, if you didn't think she was a psychopath before...

 

Just read this story and i was wtaf. Sicko

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Thefox81 said:

Just read this story and i was wtaf. Sicko

 

I generally find the people that get obsessed with true crime cases and mysteries and act like they're entertainment a bit ghoulish and grim. Especially the conspiracy theorists that get ridiculously involved pulling at any tiny thread of rumour and thinking they're experts on what "really" happened. 

 

But if there's one case I absolutely did follow and was convinced by, it was that. 

 

The Italian police absolutely ****ed the case and weren't prepared for the scrutiny a pretty, privileged, American white girl kicking up a stink would bring to their investigation. No doubt about that. 

 

But she was ****ing definitely involved in Kercher's death. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

Have you heard the record breaking no. 1?

 

Demise of the monoculture: why so many have never heard UK’s record-breaking No 1 single | UK charts | The Guardian

 

https://share.google/q8EiL05l5z111Pns4

 

I don't think I have, certainly not knowingly. 

 

The article is very interesting, how streaming just narrows people's musical taste because the algorithm just gives them more of the same.

 

For me, that's just boring. I'm in my late 50s and I still want to hear new music over an array of genres.

 

It's also something I've noticed when watching Pointless. When they have rounds about music frequently present day songs and artist are obscure answers - they're not as well remembered as music from pre-streaming times and when music shows we're on free to air TV that everyone watched.

 

The internet should have opened up new worlds to everyone, but the commercialisation of it has resulted in fracturing people into groups who are just fed more of the same, be that music or, more concerningly, opinions.

I hadn't heard it. Gave it a listen and thought it very ordinary at best. On the plus side I have noticed some younger people appreciate music from artists from the past that they may never of heard of otherwise

Posted
7 hours ago, SpacedX said:

 

 

I'm never going to stop. I do it almost exclusively for you these days, I haven't had a nibble in ages I was worried something might have happened to you tbf. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Went for a country walk today. Walked through a village green where there is wooden bench donated in memory of a former villager. Some prat very recently has bearing in mind the hot weather has laid a disposal bbq which has burnt through the bench. Could have caused a fire and certainly ruined the bench. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
On 06/08/2026 at 12:22, Finnegan said:

 

I generally find the people that get obsessed with true crime cases and mysteries and act like they're entertainment a bit ghoulish and grim. Especially the conspiracy theorists that get ridiculously involved pulling at any tiny thread of rumour and thinking they're experts on what "really" happened. 

 

But if there's one case I absolutely did follow and was convinced by, it was that. 

 

The Italian police absolutely ****ed the case and weren't prepared for the scrutiny a pretty, privileged, American white girl kicking up a stink would bring to their investigation. No doubt about that. 

 

But she was ****ing definitely involved in Kercher's death. 

 

Interesting how people can come to such different conclusions. I've read up on the case and am absolutely certain she was definitely not involved in Kercher's death.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 30/07/2026 at 18:36, Foxdiamond said:

Please don't give me flak for this useless information. Many of us know flak comes from anti aircraft fire (from the German) Not so well known is that British and Commonwealth airmen called it Archie. From a music hall ditty called Archibald Certainly Not! A bit of humour about something that could be deadly

I didn't know this so thanks.

Called Archie during WWI, seems that by WWII both sides called it flak.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 03/08/2026 at 21:46, DennisNedry said:

I was thinking today what it's mad that motorbikes exist.

 

If they never had existed, and somebody today came up with the idea of a very powerful 2-wheeled vehicle that the driver sits on with basically no protection in the event of a crash, it'd be laughed off as far too dangerous.

If you invented the car now then kerbs would proobably be 2 foot high to protect pedestrians.

Posted
22 minutes ago, hackneyfox said:

I didn't know this so thanks.

Called Archie during WWI, seems that by WWII both sides called it flak.

If you are interested in ww1 aviation I recommend No Parachute by Arthur Gould Lee who was a pilot during that war.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 07/08/2026 at 15:20, bovril said:

Interesting how people can come to such different conclusions. I've read up on the case and am absolutely certain she was definitely not involved in Kercher's death.

Agreed, I read about it extensively and came to the same conclusion 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...