Premier League 2021/22 Thread

[goody2028]

2 minutes ago, Tielemans63 said:

Another game decided by a **** in a caravan.

 

I'm genuinely falling out of love with the game. It's so corrupt. Anyone who thinks that's OTT should have a good think about the inexplicable decisions given every ****ing week.

 

At least the PL keep their precious title race going this way.

Surely it would keep the title race going even more if they’d given a pen

[The Year Of The Fox]

Truth be told- though I claimed it was a penalty on here at the time, the rules change that often and are that ambiguous that I had no clue whether it should’ve or shouldn’t have. 

[CrispinLA in Texas]

Managers like Brendan or Lampard don't make a fuss, Managers like Klopp or Conte go mental which encourages the crowd and the Refs then give in as they don't want to be in the receiving end of a backlash

Edited 26 February 2022 by CrispinLA in Texas

[The Year Of The Fox]

Glad City won though. The only way 2022 could get any worse would be Liverpool winning the title again. 

[Super_horns]

Particularly poor from the VAR guy who gets a good look at it .

[Vacamion]

1 minute ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Glad City won though. The only way 2022 could get any worse would be Liverpool winning the title again. 

 

Yep.

 

Let them have their one in the last 30 years, same as us, which their fans missed.

 

 

[goody2028]

Ref to Ashley Cole:

[trabuch]

Good result for us. Terrible for football though.

[Tielemans63]

6 minutes ago, KingsX said:

 

I rather doubt he likes his caviar with a dash of plutonium. 

His daughter has (publicly condemned the war). Perhaps she has more bollocks than he does.

 

He's probably one of the few who probably could speak out without fear of reprisals. Maybe he is in favour of the attacks in which case he's a despicable **** 

 

Edited 26 February 2022 by Tielemans63

[The Year Of The Fox]

3 minutes ago, trabuch said:

Good result for us. Terrible for football though.

But good for humanity 

[st albans fox]

4 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Particularly poor from the VAR guy who gets a good look at it .

If that’s handball then West Ham’s goal has to be disallowed…

 

It’s that simple 

 

not enough clear evidence to overturn the onfield call 

[sishades]

6 points above the bottom three with Burnley, Leeds and Brentford coming up in the next 4, with Arsenal away. We must take a minimum of 7 points from those game or its serious squeaky buttocks time.

[Corky]

Man City players complaining about something being left on Ederson.

 

Now you know how it feels.

[Fox92]

Just now, sishades said:

6 points above the bottom three with Burnley, Leeds and Brentford coming up in the next 4, with Arsenal away. We must take a minimum of 7 points from those game or its serious squeaky buttocks time.

You do realise all the sides below us also have tough games don't you? 

 

Plus they've all got to take points off each other. 

Take Brentford as an example - next month they've got Norwich, Burnley and then us.

[Soar Fox]

1 minute ago, st albans fox said:

If that’s handball then West Ham’s goal has to be disallowed…

 

It’s that simple 

 

not enough clear evidence to overturn the onfield call 

We’ll just ignore Rodri moving his arm towards the ball then shall we. 

[Ric Flair]

1 minute ago, sishades said:

6 points above the bottom three with Burnley, Leeds and Brentford coming up in the next 4, with Arsenal away. We must take a minimum of 7 points from those game or its serious squeaky buttocks time.

Don't put it past us to balls it up. All the predictors and stats modelling the last 2 years had it pretty much impossible for us to not achieve top 4 and yet we managed to throw it away, not once but twice. We are more than capable of focusing the mind and really zoning in on relegation.

[Super_horns]

Offside apparently earlier in the build up but as we never hear what is being said fans get left in the dark .

 

 

[Sunbury Fox]

3 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

If that’s handball then West Ham’s goal has to be disallowed…

 

It’s that simple 

 

not enough clear evidence to overturn the onfield call 

Totally agree. Kavanagh was the VAR official for both so at least he has been consistent. 

[st albans fox]

1 minute ago, Steve_Walsh5 said:

We’ll just ignore Rodri moving his arm towards the ball then shall we. 

That’s completely irrelevant - I’m assuming it was deliberate contact with his arm.  But it’s in the sleeve area, just like Dawson’s apparently was 

[Blue717]

4 minutes ago, sishades said:

6 points above the bottom three with Burnley, Leeds and Brentford coming up in the next 4, with Arsenal away. We must take a minimum of 7 points from those game or its serious squeaky buttocks time.

Think you need to look at the table and upcoming fixtures for everyone. If anyone just read your posts alone, you’d think we were bottom. 

[The Year Of The Fox]

2 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Offside apparently earlier in the build up but as we never hear what is being said fans get left in the dark .

 

 

Shouldn’t that be a different’phase’ under these rules? 

[Sunbury Fox]

This sleeve rule makes no sense to me. What happens if a player is wearing a long sleeve shirt??

[sishades]

Just now, Blue717 said:

Think you need to look at the table and upcoming fixtures for everyone. If anyone just read your posts alone, you’d think we were bottom.

You are right...but 50 years of being a foxes fan has left a terrible mental scar  that causes me to always look on the dark abyss side of football life. Other than that life is great.

[Super_horns]

1 minute ago, The Year Of The Fox said:

Shouldn’t that be a different’phase’ under these rules? 

No idea - not sure anyone is .

[The Year Of The Fox]

1 minute ago, Sunbury Fox said:

This sleeve rule makes no sense to me. What happens if a player is wearing a long sleeve shirt??

Or summer dress- long sleeves, rolled up