Corky Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 Abramovich isn't giving Chelsea away, this will probably be temporary whilst the Ukraine situation is continuing. He'd be able to sell it for billions if he wanted to.
cruzFOX Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 Penalty all day long that. VAR are a bunch of plonkers
Popular Post Soar Fox Posted 26 February 2022 Popular Post Posted 26 February 2022 2 minutes ago, st albans fox said: That’s completely irrelevant - I’m assuming it was deliberate contact with his arm. But it’s in the sleeve area, just like Dawson’s apparently was What’s he wearing skin coloured sleeves? 8
StanSP Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 Just seen the Rodri handball. Amazing how that's not given. Especially when you think what Moutinho was penalised for against Man City couple months back. Then you realise its Chris Kavanagh on VAR and it makes a tad more sense. 1
Popular Post Fox92 Posted 26 February 2022 Popular Post Posted 26 February 2022 6 minutes ago, st albans fox said: That’s completely irrelevant - I’m assuming it was deliberate contact with his arm. But it’s in the sleeve area, just like Dawson’s apparently was It's "sleeve area" when they want it to be. If that's an Everton player then Man City get the decision and, worse than that, their players would be surrounding the referee to give the decision. 5
Tielemans63 Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 1 minute ago, Corky said: Abramovich isn't giving Chelsea away, this will probably be temporary whilst the Ukraine situation is continuing. He'd be able to sell it for billions if he wanted to. Perhaps he sees the endless business opportunities that come with war and the destruction of another sovereign nation. Leave Chelsea to the underlings while you go and make a couple more billion.
SouthStandUpperTier Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 I've heard the LA Lakers want Rodri to be their new Point Guard.
st albans fox Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 7 minutes ago, Fox92 said: It's "sleeve area" when they want it to be. If that's an Everton player then Man City get the decision and, worse than that, their players would be surrounding the referee to give the decision. I think it’s a pen but as has been said above, kavanagh is consistent because he made the same judgment at our place if kavanagh gives that then there is absolute uproar on here and quite rightly
Phenom Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 They called the offside before the handball. They mentioned in in the American telecast. 1
Finnegan Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 13 minutes ago, StanSP said: Just seen the Rodri handball. Amazing how that's not given. Especially when you think what Moutinho was penalised for against Man City couple months back. Then you realise its Chris Kavanagh on VAR and it makes a tad more sense. They'll have to change the rule AGAIN for next year, it's getting ridiculous. No way they'll leave it as it is. The ref is taking pelters for it but in all fairness they've got absolutely no idea how to police it because the wording of the law is so fvcking ridiculous. Wherever thought up the sleeve thing was either a complete moron or deliberately facilitating corruption. 1
Super_horns Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 6 minutes ago, Phenom said: They called the offside before the handball. They mentioned in in the American telecast. Apparently this has nothing to do with the decision and they just don’t think it was handball .
st albans fox Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 4 minutes ago, Finnegan said: They'll have to change the rule AGAIN for next year, it's getting ridiculous. No way they'll leave it as it is. The ref is taking pelters for it but in all fairness they've got absolutely no idea how to police it because the wording of the law is so fvcking ridiculous. Wherever thought up the sleeve thing was either a complete moron or deliberately facilitating corruption. 100% we mentioned this a couple, weeks back with the Dawson goal how can you have a t shirt line when the actual ball contact is impossible to judge ?? IFAB f up again by fiddling with a rule change which was ill thought out in the first place ….
st albans fox Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 1 minute ago, Super_horns said: Apparently this has nothing to do with the decision and they just don’t think it was handball . It’s Kavanagh - he probably hasn’t even realised !
The Bear Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 33 minutes ago, StanSP said: Just seen the Rodri handball. Amazing how that's not given. Especially when you think what Moutinho was penalised for against Man City couple months back. Then you realise its Chris Kavanagh on VAR and it makes a tad more sense. Yep: 2
Plastik Man Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 11 minutes ago, Super_horns said: Apparently this has nothing to do with the decision and they just don’t think it was handball . It's just outrageous. I've heard so many excuses for these dodgy decisions and in this case none of them add up. It hit his raised arm. I don't care what percentage was above and below the sleeve line, there was clearly contact with his arm below the sleeveline. Clear and obvious? Well if the ref missed it and the video shows it hitting his arm, it's clearly and obviously handball! As for the alleged earlier off-side, from the still I've seen Richarlison doesn't even look off-side! Not that we saw any VAR stills with lines etc. 1
Popular Post Tielemans63 Posted 26 February 2022 Popular Post Posted 26 February 2022 Completely agree with Lampard here: 7
st albans fox Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 Where was the conversation on handball with Dawson’s goal ??? sky barely mentioned it after that game compared to this evening ….. 1
adam Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 How can they say there was not enough evidence. It just doesn't make any sense. They need to use the ****ing pitch side screen as well.
Phenom Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 US telecast seems pretty confident that it was offside, even though they didn’t show it.
Super_horns Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Phenom said: US telecast seems pretty confident that it was offside, even though they didn’t show it. Lampard has said it wasn’t to do with offside . Just they thought it wasn’t handball https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.goal.com/en/amp/news/everton-man-city-penalty-handball-furious/blte30b7534b8ec7a2b . Edited 26 February 2022 by Super_horns
Popular Post AyewJoking Posted 26 February 2022 Popular Post Posted 26 February 2022 Time to scrap VAR, its bringing the game into disrepute on a weekly basis. I'd rather go back to plain old on pitch cunty referee's. 5
Plastik Man Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 5 minutes ago, Royston. said: Time to scrap VAR, its bringing the game into disrepute on a weekly basis. I'd rather go back to plain old on pitch cunty referee's. Surely time to mic them up, like in rugby. Let us hear the conversation and rationale for their decisions. Mind you, I can't see it happening! 1
AyewJoking Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 2 minutes ago, Plastik Man said: Surely time to mic them up, like in rugby. Let us hear the conversation and rationale for their decisions. Mind you, I can't see it happening! Cos we would hear them say...."sleeve, no hand ball but it's old Trafford and fergie is glaring at me" 1
Spudulike Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 Isn't it a line drawn across the chest from the armpit? Where did the tee shirt sleeve thing come from?
trabuch Posted 26 February 2022 Posted 26 February 2022 I've said it before. Mike Riley is a massive **** who appears to hate football.
Recommended Posts