Samilktray Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 4 minutes ago, Cincinnati Fox said: And Gallagher and ziyech start despite both having bids accepted on deadline day Gallagher didn’t want to leave so slightly different to Ziyech
Vacamion Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 (edited) Palinha can be a bit of a dirty Bertie, but that yellow he picked up looked to me like it was for a blatant dive by the Chelsea lad, prior to any contact. Intetesting that Sky didn't show it in more detail. Edited 3 February 2023 by Vacamion Spello
Cincinnati Fox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 2 minutes ago, Samilktray said: Gallagher didn’t want to leave so slightly different to Ziyech Yes but they club happy for them to leave yet both start a couple of days latter. That’s a bit odd. 1
coolhandfox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 How can you spend 500m in one season and still not have a decent striker. 1
TrentFox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 Stupidly, I gambled on Mudryk this week for my fantasy team. Having therefore watched him closely, he looks lost. And a bit lightweight. Bottled three tackles already. Skill level good, but very underwhelmed so far.
FoyleFox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 7 minutes ago, Supergray22 said: Unbelievable really isn’t it. The squad will be almost unmanageable. They have offered all those long contracts but inevitably will need to freshen things up in years to come. Meanwhile players will lose form and motivation and they will lose millions in wasted player value. Basically hamstringing their on field potential and spinning money up the wall. It’s a gamble I wouldn’t be happy entertaining. You can almost picture Potter sitting at home on deadline day, texting Todd, "please stop signing players" 😂
Supergray22 Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 7 minutes ago, FoyleFox said: You can almost picture Potter sitting at home on deadline day, texting Todd, "please stop signing players" 😂 Exactly. Add a few expletives too.
trugerkem Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 I haven’t watched it all but from what I have seen the referee hardly seems impartial… I wonder if he has a Chelsea shirt on under that outfit
fazzyfox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 Not a Chelsea shot on target in first half apparently. Oh if only they had a budget to address such problems, poor lambs
Chelmofox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 Just now, fazzyfox said: Not a Chelsea shot on target in first half apparently. Oh if only they had a budget to address such problems, poor lambs Yet Sky only showed Chelsea moves at half time. Not a single Fulham chance got a look in. 1
FoyleFox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 Chelsea sub just getting his shirt on and ready, despite having a full 15 minutes at half time to get ready! 1
The Bear Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 (edited) Havertz flicked that ball over the top on target didn't he, and Leno saved? Or was he offside? Edited 3 February 2023 by The Bear
fazzyfox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 Crikey, “Only sing when you’re winning” would be very appropriate tonight. To be fair it’s hard to sing with a prawn sandwich in your gob ( I’d imagine…I’ve never indulged in that luxury)
TJQuik Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 55 minutes ago, KingsX said: Hear, hear! It's become a sacred mission to keep that money-pissing idiot and his club out of the Champions League ... out of Europe this year if possible. Boehly has kicked hundreds of millions in costs down the road with all these huge, seven-plus year contracts. If Chelsea can't be CL regulars, how will they attract the sponsorship and prize money to cover them? I'd love to see this house of cards crash down. Wishful thinking I'm afraid. It's unlikely that they'll be kept out of the CL for longer than a season with the money they're spending. Football nowadays is about having the fattest wallet.
goose2010 Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 Chelsea would have been better chucking 300m at PSG for mbappe that the ones they have signed. 2
TrentFox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 Fulham have been very impressive. Organised, physical, fast and together. Would love to see our boys play like this. 1
Supergray22 Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 2 minutes ago, goose2010 said: Chelsea would have been better chucking 300m at PSG for mbappe that the ones they have signed. True but that said I do think Madueke was a good buy.
Super_horns Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 6 minutes ago, TrentFox said: Fulham have been very impressive. Organised, physical, fast and together. Would love to see our boys play like this. Silva is a decent manager - except at Everton but everyone falls there ! 1
FoyleFox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 2 minutes ago, Fox42 said: Tete has been a monster Likewise, Palhina.
South Shire Fox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 (edited) Palhina would of been class for us. A quality DM whos technical ability is as good as his reading of the game. Take note Wilfried ‘2 left feet’ Ndidi Edited 3 February 2023 by South Shire Fox 2
st albans fox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 10 minutes ago, TrentFox said: Fulham have been very impressive. Organised, physical, fast and together. Would love to see our boys play like this. We played them off the park for 45 minutes a few weeks ago …
fazzyfox Posted 3 February 2023 Posted 3 February 2023 When you go through with your scissor kick but the ball is intercepted before it can get to you .
Recommended Posts