Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

No - if it makes contact with your  hand/arm it and it breaks to the scorer then it’s disallowed .  Any contact with hand/am (intentional or not) that leads DIRECTLY to a goal is disallowed.   Directly means next contact is the goal scorer or pass to goal scorer.  In that instance, if salah scores then it’s rued out. 

Like Perez in the FA Cup final you mean?😎

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Vacamion said:

 

If that 1st goal was scored against us, we would be rightly fuming. 

 

And callung it a conspiracy.

 

I just can't understand what the lads in the VAR truck aint seeing.

 

 

They can't get involved.

Posted

Absolutely massive if Leeds lose this. A win would have put them out of reach, but a loss, which looks likely, keeps them in touch with us playing them next week. Need Harvey back for that one, he loves scoring against Leeds.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, bovril said:

Can I shock you? I actually like Liverpool. 

It's their plastic 'fans' that are annoying. 

I work with 3/4. The local boozer is full of 'em, all wearing the latest shirt (at least 5 years out of date).....and think Anfield is a piece of farmland. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Leicesterpool said:

If i had to choose the bottom three right now I'd select West Ham, Everton and Leeds.

Why guess? Much more likely to get it right if you look at the table

Posted
2 minutes ago, Vacamion said:

 

If that 1st goal was scored against us, we would be rightly fuming. 

 

And callung it a conspiracy.

 

I just can't understand what the lads in the VAR truck aint seeing.

 

 

It’s easy - it is a conspiracy. Anything to keep the scum-bag 6 onside. Week in, week out they get the huge benefit of the doubt. 🤮

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Corky said:

They can't get involved.

Seems ridiculous. A foul early in the build up can mean a goal.is chalked off but not a handball? If Trent doesn't handle it, the goal doesn't happen. 

Posted
Just now, FoxyJim1987 said:

Seems ridiculous. A foul early in the build up can mean a goal.is chalked off but not a handball? If Trent doesn't handle it, the goal doesn't happen. 

They can. People are getting mixed up between the two parts of the handball offence.

 

This incident is the top part of the offence below, and not the bit relating to scoring in the opponents goal. 

 

It is an offence if a player: 

  • deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, for example moving the hand/arm towards the ball
  • touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised
  • scores in the opponents' goal:
    • directly from their hand/arm, even if accidental, including by the goalkeeper
    • immediately after the ball has touched their hand/arm, even if accidental

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Craig said:

They can. People are getting mixed up between the two parts of the handball offence.

 

This incident is the top part of the offence below, and not the bit relating to scoring in the opponents goal. 

 

It is an offence if a player: 

  • deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, for example moving the hand/arm towards the ball
  • touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised
  • scores in the opponents' goal:
    • directly from their hand/arm, even if accidental, including by the goalkeeper
    • immediately after the ball has touched their hand/arm, even if accidental

 

Cut the bollocks, it's handball should be no goal simple as. If we conceded that we'd be fuming.

  • Like 4
Posted
1 minute ago, FoxyJim1987 said:

Cut the bollocks, it's handball should be no goal simple as. If we conceded that we'd be fuming.

Yeah, that's what the laws say as I posted. 

Posted
Just now, StanSP said:

What's Carragher saying about the handball?

Something like "look I know it looks like erm he's caught the ball, bounced it, spun it on his finger and then threw it to Salah, but if they'd disallowed that it would be harsh"

  • Haha 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, FoxyJim1987 said:

Absolutely massive if Leeds lose this. A win would have put them out of reach, but a loss, which looks likely, keeps them in touch with us playing them next week. Need Harvey back for that one, he loves scoring against Leeds.

 

We really need Leeds to lose to stay in contention with them, 5pts ahead of us with 7 to play makes it really difficult for us to catch them.

It's important for us to have the relegation as any 3 from 5 as 3 from 4 makes us vulnerable to a rival hitting some form and winning two games on the trot. 

 

We have to win one of our next two games against Wolves or Leeds.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...