TrentFox Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 Rumour at this end is forest chair has basically said the majority of the money from winning the PL lottery is there to be invested 🤷🤷
VLC86 Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 10 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: They have only signed him for 1 year, so sounds mildly sensible £10m loan signing effectively, that’s a lot of money to blow in one go with no saleable asset at the end.  Gamble.
FoxesWalk Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 8 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: £10m loan signing effectively, that’s a lot of money to blow in one go with no saleable asset at the end.  Gamble. They won’t find a better 10 for that money most likely, but yeah, no resale valueÂ
Dahnsouff Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 16 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: £10m loan signing effectively, that’s a lot of money to blow in one go with no saleable asset at the end.  Gamble. Staying up is worth way more, so a gamble sure as I could easily believe he could be crap, but not a financial risk 3
Steve Earle Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 Sam Wallace reporting Lingard has agreed an £80k per week deal with Forest, potentially £120k per week with bonuses. £200k pw never a possibility. Makes you wonder why we weren’t in the frame… 1 2
Gamble92 Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 If you get the Lingard of West Ham then it's worthwhile but that's a hell of a big if.  From a career point of view for Lingard it really does show his ambition. Chance to challenge at the top with West Ham on 130k or play at Forest for 200k. It's very telling of the man.
EastAnglianFox Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 I'd have taken on gamble on him straight after his West Ham sting when his confidence was up, but age now not on his side and did sod all last season. Â Saying that I think Forest's home form will see them comfortable next seasonÂ
phoneticerror Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 31 minutes ago, Lesta2014 said: Plenty of money from the promotion so worth gamble for one year contracts/loans especially if they stay up. Hope they absolutely bomb and do terrible though! I’d happily finish 16th place next season if the condition was that Forest got relegated 😂 3
Popular Post ronnup Posted 21 July 2022 Popular Post Posted 21 July 2022 Lingard improves there First team for a year for 10 Mill....we've blown millions on players that'll never get close to being good enough to improve us  Good move for them 6
Popular Post Dahnsouff Posted 21 July 2022 Popular Post Posted 21 July 2022 That is utterly grotesque, so much wrong with it, the footballing equivalent of a fossil fuel company 5
ScrumpyJack Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 1 hour ago, Costock_Fox said: £10m loan signing effectively, that’s a lot of money to blow in one go with no saleable asset at the end.  Gamble. Every transfer is a gamble, Lingard could be the difference between relegation and staying in the prem for Forest if he shows up. Quality on his day. 1
VLC86 Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 5 minutes ago, ScrumpyJack said: Every transfer is a gamble, Lingard could be the difference between relegation and staying in the prem for Forest if he shows up. Quality on his day. Of course, but usually you still have an asset to offset the gamble.
ScrumpyJack Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 17 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: Of course, but usually you still have an asset to offset the gamble. JLingz brand association with the club is pure #stonksÂ
Grebfromgrebland Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 24 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said: Of course, but usually you still have an asset to offset the gamble. Unless it's tielemansÂ
ScrumpyJack Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 8 minutes ago, Oshhhh said: Ex Leicester player sold two years ago Glad you clarified lad there was a lot going on thereÂ
NaijaFox Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 2 hours ago, Gamble92 said: If you get the Lingard of West Ham then it's worthwhile but that's a hell of a big if.  From a career point of view for Lingard it really does show his ambition. Chance to challenge at the top with West Ham on 130k or play at Forest for 200k. It's very telling of the man. What's he likely to achieve at West Ham that he hasn't already at Man Utd? Dude's pushing 30 in a time-limited career, he should take the cash and secure his future. 1
NaijaFox Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 15 minutes ago, Oshhhh said: Ex Leicester player sold two years ago He wasn't sold. His contract ran out, he declined to re-sign and we got compensation for his youth training.
NaijaFox Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 2 hours ago, ronnup said: Lingard improves there First team for a year for 10 Mill....we've blown millions on players that'll never get close to being good enough to improve us  Good move for them No need to dredge up Vestergaard on every transfer thread...Â
Sly Posted 21 July 2022 Posted 21 July 2022 Willock did it at Newcastle ….. scored loads on loan, then did nothing once he arrived permanently.  At West Ham, he’d be living in London, looking after his brother / sister. Maybe he didn’t want to uproot them. At Forest, it’s commutable, low risk at 12 months and he’s getting a better weekly wage. Sometimes, we forget football is a job to, that despite being good at it, some players won’t enjoy it and just go through the motions.  On the aside, how many players have played for Leicester, Derby and Forest? Peter Shilton is the only one I could think of.Â
Electric Yetis Posted 22 July 2022 Posted 22 July 2022 21 minutes ago, Sly said: On the aside, how many players have played for Leicester, Derby and Forest? Peter Shilton is the only one I could think of. Gary Mills
Lambert09 Posted 22 July 2022 Posted 22 July 2022 5 hours ago, NaijaFox said: What's he likely to achieve at West Ham that he hasn't already at Man Utd? Dude's pushing 30 in a time-limited career, he should take the cash and secure his future.  that’s the confusing part. surely a risk free 3 years at a club pushing for europe is more sensible than 1 year with a bit more upfront cash?  If he flops and they go down, the poor lad will end up playing for everton next yearÂ
Aus Fox Posted 22 July 2022 Posted 22 July 2022 2 hours ago, Sly said: Willock did it at Newcastle ….. scored loads on loan, then did nothing once he arrived permanently.  At West Ham, he’d be living in London, looking after his brother / sister. Maybe he didn’t want to uproot them. At Forest, it’s commutable, low risk at 12 months and he’s getting a better weekly wage. Sometimes, we forget football is a job to, that despite being good at it, some players won’t enjoy it and just go through the motions.  On the aside, how many players have played for Leicester, Derby and Forest? Peter Shilton is the only one I could think of. Gary Charles springs to mind, he also played for both Villa and Brum. I reckon you could come up with quite a few players if you went through the years.
NaijaFox Posted 22 July 2022 Posted 22 July 2022 17 minutes ago, Lambert09 said:  that’s the confusing part. surely a risk free 3 years at a club pushing for europe is more sensible than 1 year with a bit more upfront cash?  If he flops and they go down, the poor lad will end up playing for everton next year And unless things have drastically changed at Everton, he'll likely end up making even more money.  It's a calculated gamble of course (many things in life are), but he could very well end up being this season's Christian Eriksen.
Recommended Posts