Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, lgfualol said:

This is either happening or it isnt

Or it happens, but he can't play for us because of paperwork issues. 

 

Things are never just black or white :ph34r:

Posted
42 minutes ago, An Sionnach said:

Transfers are usually financed on the never never. The Fofana fee will be payed over a period. Why do people think fees are always paid up front? Football is a business.

Except haven’t we taken a loan out to get the fofana money upfront with Chelsea paying back the money to the bank

Posted
Just now, RoboFox said:

LCFC insider lol

 

Would get more credible insight from Sean from Enderby.

I've been following him for about a year now, and surprisingly he's usually right if not always.

Posted
56 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said:

YES IM REACHING

What is there to agree with Shakhtar though? They have agreed a price with Lyon so we'd just need to match it.

 

The hold up was always going to be with Lyon.

Posted
7 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

What is there to agree with Shakhtar though? They have agreed a price with Lyon so we'd just need to match it.

 

The hold up was always going to be with Lyon.

You’re forgetting the Premier League tax.

Posted
2 hours ago, Nick said:

Why is every thread just Brendan Rogers hate and sweet FA to do with the topic? 

Because our transfers are notoriously slow he's made a huge deal about not being backed and so have the media so naturally its going to crop up in transfer related activity. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

What is there to agree with Shakhtar though? They have agreed a price with Lyon so we'd just need to match it.

 

The hold up was always going to be with Lyon.

Last years pricing bears no relationship to now. Shakhtar have seen us coming and will extract the maximum. After all what have they got to lose they are not paying his wages.

Posted
20 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

What is there to agree with Shakhtar though? They have agreed a price with Lyon so we'd just need to match it.

 

The hold up was always going to be with Lyon.

The price is agreed with them and not us. We negotiate a new price and they can ask for more if they want.

Posted
2 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Faivre is at Lyon already and being told he can leave, he's a left footed right winger who we've been linked with in thr past and I'd be very keen on him worst case scenario.

 

They are apparently getting Thauvin who will be an impact player at his age from the bench I'd suspect. I hope they are still open to Tete going, they either want him permanently or they don't and if they don't but would ordinarily keep him until the summer then I suspect being compensated and replacing him with Thauvin will be sufficient.

 

Whatever, it needs to be sorted in the next day or so otherwise we move on.

People also need to remember Faivre may be looking at Thauvin for a specific role in the team, and may feel that if they don’t complete Thauvin that Tete may be able to complete the job for the rest of the season as they have no obligation to buy.

 

Transfers often depend on someone else getting there business done.

Posted
24 minutes ago, AKCJ said:

What is there to agree with Shakhtar though? They have agreed a price with Lyon so we'd just need to match it.

 

The hold up was always going to be with Lyon.

That’s not the case at all Lookman being the prime example this summer. Players can go to teams for more or less dependent on how they perform. That agreement is contracted to Lyon only, he doesn’t have a release clause of that amount.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Buzzell said:

This is the signing we’ve been crying out for for years. I hope this gets done.

If we pay up we can get him. If we don't , we won't. His only incentive to move here is money. We are a struggling team with a zombie manager and are definitely not sexy.

Guest Mickyblueeyes
Posted
1 hour ago, FrankieADZ said:

YES IM REACHING

This guy. Mr Insider has given himself away as an absolute liar. 

 

Anyone who tells us that we have a deal agreed with one party and not the other is lying. Is clueless. 

 

We have no need to negotiate with Lyon. Lyon will not negotiate with us. It will be Shaktar and only Shaktar that we need to convince. 

 

That is why this deal is being labelled as "difficult" because for once, it genuinely is. 

Posted

The definition of insanity is me refreshing pages in the “Transfer Talk” section of Foxestalk and NewsNow websites thinking that this window will be different! 
 

:mad::(:angry::unsure:

  • Haha 4
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...