Women's World Cup 2023 - Australia/New Zealand

[LCFCJoe96]

Great until Walsh’s injury, fairly flat since then. Would like to see us try something different up top, Russo has been ineffective.

[Bert]

This has been a terrible second half. 

[CosbehFox]

Utter dirge this half. Look unfit in the extreme. 

[Lionator]

Denmark's women are almost as turgid as their men at the world cup last year. Imagine watching the Haiti game and how they worried England and then playing like that. 

 

Also FIFA missed a trick in not giving Australia the mens world cup last year.

[Super_horns]

So your classic England group stage at a major tournament?

 

Make it hard work and suffer an injury or two along the way !

[Lineker's Lugs]

2 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

So your classic England group stage at a major tournament?

 

Make it hard work and suffer an injury or two along the way !

You are Mark F and I claim my 5 pounds.

[Super_horns]

3 minutes ago, Lineker's Lugs said:

You are Mark F and I claim my 5 pounds.

Get around .

 

[stripeyfox]

not a classic by any means, but a win is a win.

 

 

 

 

[Tielemans63]

Big fan of Jonas Eidevall as a pundit. Excellent 

[purpleronnie]

Well that was almost as bad as the Haiti match.  The amount of times we attacked only to turn round and pass it back.  We might make the semi's but it will end there.

[Guest BlueBrett]

Don't think they do the women's game any favours by televising all these matches. 

[purpleronnie]

8 minutes ago, BlueBrett said:

Don't think they do the women's game any favours by televising all these matches. 

Why's that?

[TJQuik]

26 minutes ago, purpleronnie said:

Why's that?

They've got women in them so they're for some reason worse

 

Even though people will sit through every turgid men's group stage match that ends in 0-0

[LCFCJoe96]

39 minutes ago, BlueBrett said:

Don't think they do the women's game any favours by televising all these matches. 

Always one

[The Doctor]

43 minutes ago, BlueBrett said:

Don't think they do the women's game any favours by televising all these matches. 

Should probably spend more time working out who'd win in a fight between kolo and yaya toure and less time posting nonsense like this

[stripeyfox]

1 hour ago, BlueBrett said:

Don't think they do the women's game any favours by televising all these matches. 

interesting take. Why do you think this?

[Lionator]

Ref/FIFA paid off by the CCP here. 

[Lionator]

1 hour ago, BlueBrett said:

Don't think they do the women's game any favours by televising all these matches. 

The men’s rugby world cup starts next month where about half of the group games will be absolute pastings. But it’s worth watching if you’re into it. If you don’t like women’s football then don’t watch it. 

[TJQuik]

8 minutes ago, Lionator said:

Ref/FIFA paid off by the CCP here. 

Even more mad than the sexist bloke

[StanSP]

2 hours ago, BlueBrett said:

Don't think they do the women's game any favours by televising all these matches. 

 

 

 

 

[Super_horns]

3 hours ago, TJQuik said:

They've got women in them so they're for some reason worse

 

Even though people will sit through every turgid men's group stage match that ends in 0-0

And in 2026 when there are 48 teams in the Mens World cup we will probably see loads of one sided games and some dour ones.

 

 

[Parafox]

6 hours ago, BlueBrett said:

Don't think they do the women's game any favours by televising all these matches. 

I don't understand this POV.

 

All the men's WC games are televised and I'm not aware of any similar conjecture from anyone, anywhere.

 

Please elaborate on your post. Thanks.

Edited 28 July 2023 by Parafox

[purpleronnie]

1 hour ago, Parafox said:

I don't understand this POV.

 

All the men's WC games are televised and I'm not aware of any similar conjecture from anyone, anywhere.

 

Please elaborate on your post. Thanks.

I don't think he will.

[StanSP]

Don't think @BlueBrett does himself any favours by making misogynistic posts on this forum. 

[Bert]

8 hours ago, purpleronnie said:

Why's that?

I think he’s trying to say the quality is poor. But in a really bad way.