Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Torquay Gunner said:

Sadly in Russia where it matters, I can't see his death changing anything for the better. I would love to be proved wrong of course. 

I hear you, bro…

Posted
3 hours ago, Parafox said:

If you get a return to sender, don't open it.

 

(Is "return to sender" still a thing that happens)?

Yes.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

And to think he almost got away with it.

He would have if it wasn't for those meddling kids

Posted
44 minutes ago, Bellend Sebastian said:

I've usually got no time for the grifting orange tw#t but quite tempted by the gold trainers TBF

Saw them and thought of you. 
 

They am your pimp style fo sho. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Daggers said:

Saw them and thought of you. 
 

They am your pimp style fo sho. 

I'm confident that if I got them then I'd earn the respect of young people that I've been really struggling to command

  • Haha 3
Posted

People suggesting PMQ's was very subdued today like when the Queen died.

 

Was wondering if something was up. World leaders kinda just chilling so it's obviously something domestic.

 

Worrying.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Lionator said:

People suggesting PMQ's was very subdued today like when the Queen died.

 

Was wondering if something was up. World leaders kinda just chilling so it's obviously something domestic.

 

Worrying.

While watching it I began to wonder if there had been some sort of agreement between the two to try and be a bit more civil. PMQ’s has recently descended into an even more embarrassing spectacle than it’s always been, I wonder if the controversy around Sunak’s trans comment before recess was enough to force them to take a look at themselves and reconsider how they come across. 
 

While it was relatively dull, I found it a pleasant improvement over what we’ve seen lately. Sunak still didn’t come close to answering a single question, but it all felt considerably more like grown ups rather than kids in a playground. 

Posted
54 minutes ago, Lionator said:

People suggesting PMQ's was very subdued today like when the Queen died.

 

Was wondering if something was up. World leaders kinda just chilling so it's obviously something domestic.

 

Worrying.

I wondered whether Starmer had an attack line on Kemi Badenoch ready, then they decided just before it started that going hard on it might backfire because this memo isn’t as damning as the sacked PO guy thought it would be.

Posted

Plus is could be a tough afternoon in the chamber for Keir Starmer so he and his team might have figured that a quieter PMQs might be for the best.

Posted
59 minutes ago, Lionator said:

People suggesting PMQ's was very subdued today like when the Queen died.

 

Was wondering if something was up. World leaders kinda just chilling so it's obviously something domestic.

 

Worrying.

Probably doesn’t help that Trident has failed twice in its missile tests.

Posted

Time to get our head out of the USA’s arse and think geopolitically in broader terms now that we know that their word is no more reliable than Putins as demonstrated by Trump and the House Republicans 

Posted

Frankly the result of it all suggests that Hoyle was right. Conservatives and SNP both just come across as bitter that they couldn’t use the issue to split Labour.

  • Like 3
Posted
8 minutes ago, Dunge said:

Frankly the result of it all suggests that Hoyle was right. Conservatives and SNP both just come across as bitter that they couldn’t use the issue to split Labour.

How did the latest round of PMs Unanswered Questions go?  lol

 

Posted
34 minutes ago, Zear0 said:

Another quiet night in The Commons. Shambles all around tbh

What thecfeck has ACTUALLY happened?

Just tuned in and it sounds like when Mike Tyson lost to James Buster Douglas!

 

Posted
Just now, Paninistickers said:

I don't understand the procedural hoo-ha that surrounds this

In allowing the tabling of an opposition amendment to a proposal from another opposition party, Hoyle did something that, while within his remit, is highly unusual.

As such, the accusation from other parties is that he did it because of pressure from within the Labour Party in order to prevent them the embarrassment of a split down the middle for either the Tory or SNP proposal. Which would be a big thing because the speaker is supposed to be neutral and any suggestion otherwise is considered very serious.

 

That’s what’s going on. There may be some truth in it. But on the other hand the amendment that he controversially allowed is the one that’s been voted through.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...