Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
foxfanazer

King Power signings rated

By foxfanazer, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Langley

Langley

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, TheLittleBigMan said:

The best of the lot.

image.png.6141688380e3db33952db47341346c66.png

the only bloke who filled me with confidence that at any age that I too could play for Leicester City.

 

Touch of a God though.

 

Shame the body was that of Buddah.

  • Haha 4
foxfanazer

foxfanazer

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 minutes ago, Brooksy said:

Robert Huth not a 10 :nigel:

Yet Cambiasso rated a 10. Don't get me wrong he was a brilliant player for that season but he was rated higher than Huth, Simpson and Ulloa

Stadt

Stadt

Posted
Posted

The Bruma and PVA loans were fine, not a 5 and a 4.

Beckford definitely not a 6.

Knockaert wasn't a 9.

Upon was more of a 5 or a 6 not a 3.

Mendy was a 5 or 6.

Ward 4 lol !!!!

Perez and Praet 5

Daka should be a 6 

Coady 4

bovril

bovril

Posted
Posted (edited)

Drinkwater should be a 10 really for that price.

Would agree with Kockaert as a 9. Feels like a bit of a transformational signing.

Huth one of the greatest signings of all time - obviously a 10.

They've forgotten the minus sign before Ward's rating. 

Edited by bovril
  • Like 1
Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Stadt said:

The Bruma and PVA loans were fine, not a 5 and a 4.

Beckford definitely not a 6.

Knockaert wasn't a 9.

Upon was more of a 5 or a 6 not a 3.

Mendy was a 5 or 6.

Ward 4 lol !!!!

Perez and Praet 5

Daka should be a 6 

Coady 4

we don’t get promoted if we didn’t sign him. 

 

Absolutely a 9 signing! 

  • Popular Post
foxfanazer

foxfanazer

Posted
  • Author
  • Popular Post
Posted
39 minutes ago, Stadt said:

The Bruma and PVA loans were fine, not a 5 and a 4.

Beckford definitely not a 6.

Knockaert wasn't a 9.

Upon was more of a 5 or a 6 not a 3.

Mendy was a 5 or 6.

Ward 4 lol !!!!

Perez and Praet 5

Daka should be a 6 

Coady 4

First player in our history to even attempt a step over

  • Haha 10
DJ Barry Hammond

DJ Barry Hammond

Posted
Posted


They’ve absolutely bottled that - no rating lower than 2, when it is clear that there are clear candidates for a 1 or 0.

 

Mad to think now that signing Harry Kane is a 4 - even if it’s justifiable in its context.

  • Like 1
Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted

How are Praet and Perez both rated as a 6? Why has left us and doing okay in La Liga. The other is shite, living off one pass, injured 80% of the time and still here. I mean they gave Amartey the same rating as well! 

 

Also, how are the likes of Michael Ball not just a 1? 
 

It is the worst piece of journalism I’ve read about us this year. 

  • Like 1
Electric Yetis

Electric Yetis

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Master Fox said:

GTF was actually Decent for us, always did the job when called upon. Scored some important goals. 

Not sure about that. He was OK but his 3 goals weren't exactly important.

 

A 90th minute goal in the 5-3 win over Bolton

A late consolation the 1-4 defeat to Brighton and a goal in the 2-0 win over Huddersfield when we'd already won the league. 

Sampson

Sampson

Posted
Posted (edited)

Knockaert did feel like the kind of player we hadn’t seen for a while when we signed him and he was a very good player as us but he doesn’t belong on the same rating as the likes of Huth, Drinkwater, Ulloa, Ndidi, Maddison, Ricardo, Tiekemans, Simpson, Nugent and Okazaki.

 

James Justin or Fofana shouldn’t be 9s either though and both feel more out of place than Knockaert. Justin especially feels way out of place amongst the 9s.

 

The most bizarre and out of place one is definitely Beckford getting a 6. He was a an absolute big money marquee flop and a complete panic buy and along with Matt Mills who rightfully scored a 2, the epitome of the early overspending under KP that Pearson had to reign in. Beckford should’ve been getting a 2 or a 3 if you wanted to be really generous because of that single performance vs Forest.

Edited by Sampson
  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...