Sol thewall Bamba Posted 6 February Posted 6 February 31 minutes ago, Fox92 said: Which is wrong. They should never be able to go over the manager. Same with when Ranieri was here. Players are a joke. Yeah. When your "leaders" are Harry Winks and Connor Coady you know you're in deep trouble. 2
Dmitry Posted 6 February Posted 6 February (edited) The more I read about him, the more of an a**hole he comes out to be. I bet now his teammates look at him this way also. One week he's on tv prancing about the unity of the team, the next he wants to jump ship to the team's direct competitor. What a piece of work... I would just unload him to a Romanian or Latvian side, to make a point. Edited 6 February by Dmitry
Iwebema Posted 6 February Posted 6 February 1 hour ago, Fox92 said: Which is wrong. They should never be able to go over the manager. Same with when Ranieri was here. Players are a joke. Yeah I know this might be a bit controversial....and of course he's a legend...but I don't think Vardy is helping in this space.
FoxOnWheels Posted 6 February Posted 6 February 2 hours ago, glenny_fox said: Well maybe if Cooper hadn't been so focused on "Prem experience", and absolutely wasted about £60m on crap (not entirely his fault, but he would have definitely been involved), then maybe we could have improved the actual first 11, and made a go of it. Someone signs these transfers off though, don’t get me wrong he’s crap but no manager is doing much good with these lot
Molson Canadian Posted 27 February Posted 27 February i for one will admit that sacking him maybe wasn't a good idea. i think he would have been able to grind out some win's for us.
HesNotGudjonsonn2 Posted 27 February Posted 27 February 1 minute ago, Molson Canadian said: i for one will admit that sacking him maybe wasn't a good idea. i think he would have been able to grind out some win's for us. Hindsight can make you consider things differently but, for me, we were getting relegated with Cooper at the helm so had to make a change. It hasn’t worked out. However, I don’t think it would matter who managed this team. The quality isn’t there, but unfortunately you can’t just sack and change 20 plus players, so it always has to be the manager that goes. 2
coolhandfox Posted 27 February Posted 27 February 3 minutes ago, Molson Canadian said: i for one will admit that sacking him maybe wasn't a good idea. i think he would have been able to grind out some win's for us. He was shit, we just followed up a poor hire with another poor hire. 3
Molson Canadian Posted 27 February Posted 27 February 1 minute ago, HesNotGudjonsonn2 said: Hindsight can make you consider things differently but, for me, we were getting relegated with Cooper at the helm so had to make a change. It hasn’t worked out. However, I don’t think it would matter who managed this team. The quality isn’t there, but unfortunately you can’t just sack and change 20 plus players, so it always has to be the manager that goes. 100% agree
BenTheFox Posted 27 February Posted 27 February (edited) I think we owe him an apology. I don't think he's a great manager but he was miles better than this and it seems that some of the vitriol towards him was over the top. However, I don't feel sorry for him. His stock has actually risen since. Edited 27 February by BenTheFox 1
Popular Post moore_94 Posted 27 February Author Popular Post Posted 27 February 4 minutes ago, Molson Canadian said: i for one will admit that sacking him maybe wasn't a good idea. i think he would have been able to grind out some win's for us. Sacking Cooper was still the correct decision Just replacing him with Van Nistelrooy was absolutely the wrong decision 15 2
LCFCCKEANO Posted 27 February Posted 27 February Said it at the time, he shouldn’t have gone, the players who were acting up should’ve gone, Winks, Coady both absolute weapons with not a drop of balls between them, absolute cucks 1
LCFCCKEANO Posted 27 February Posted 27 February Didn’t say the players should’ve gone at the time to clarify but now strongly believe it
LCFCCKEANO Posted 27 February Posted 27 February 11 minutes ago, moore_94 said: Sacking Cooper was still the correct decision Just replacing him with Van Nistelrooy was absolutely the wrong decision Sacking him would’ve been right if an iota of planning went into the decision. Hiring process as per always was a mess, if we had any ability to hire managers we would’ve had a season of the manager who beat us tonight, but we had to keep Rudkin and our coaching staff, two of which were fired a week ago
eblair Posted 27 February Posted 27 February Just to counterbalance the revisionism, he signed BDCR, Ayew and Skipp and it was his strategy to sign experienced prem players bonkers we didn’t sign someone like manor Solomon in the summer but instead went for these lot 2
FrankieADZ Posted 27 February Posted 27 February stop harping on saying Cooper would have changed anything, he wasnt the right fit in the first place, we was just as bad under him as are under RVN
Kitchandro Posted 27 February Posted 27 February Who signed Reid, Ayew, Skipp and that bloke from Palace who can’t get in the squad again? ’No manager could do a good job with these players’ is not a defence of Cooper, it’s a damning indictment of his abilities. 2 1
Popular Post Wasyls Pec Deck Posted 27 February Popular Post Posted 27 February He was shit. Just because the new guy hasn’t worked out as we’d have hoped doesn’t mean he was any good. 7
adam Posted 27 February Posted 27 February Let's not pretend that sacking Cooper was the wrong decision. The football and performances under him were terrible and were getting worst by the week. we appointed the wrong man after him. 1 1
Chown Posted 27 February Posted 27 February All the evidence shows Cooper would have kept us up. Kept Forest up in similar circumstances. We were out of the bottom three when he was sacked. Scored in every single home game. Picked up points in every game against teams around us. 1 1
beepee1984 Posted 27 February Posted 27 February The performances were poor under Cooper too, but we always posed a threat which we don’t anymore
Popular Post Finnegan Posted 27 February Popular Post Posted 27 February 1 minute ago, Chown said: All the evidence shows Cooper would have kept us up. Kept Forest up in similar circumstances. We were out of the bottom three when he was sacked. Scored in every single home game. Picked up points in every game against teams around us. Get tae **** He was shite. Just because Ruud is shite too doesn't mean Cooper was worth keeping. 6
Daggers Posted 27 February Posted 27 February Just now, Finnegan said: Get tae **** He was shite. Just because Ruud is shite too doesn't mean Cooper was worth keeping. 1
Gamble92 Posted 27 February Posted 27 February Players didn't want Cooper either so eventually we'd have been at this point with him. They were genuinely convinced he was the issue and they were better than a relegation scrap. Don't let certain Leicester Journalists convince you otherwise.
Samilktray Posted 27 February Posted 27 February 3 minutes ago, Chown said: All the evidence shows Cooper would have kept us up. Kept Forest up in similar circumstances. We were out of the bottom three when he was sacked. Scored in every single home game. Picked up points in every game against teams around us. Crap username, crap post imho 3
orangecity23 Posted 27 February Posted 27 February (edited) 5 minutes ago, Chown said: All the evidence shows Cooper would have kept us up. Kept Forest up in similar circumstances. We were out of the bottom three when he was sacked. Scored in every single home game. Picked up points in every game against teams around us. One point above the bottom 3 at the time, and 2 above 19th - ahead of Palace who've massively picked up form since then. Kept Forest up because he had a net spend of a small country, then was shielded from relegation by a Rudkin and Rodgers human shield hurling itself into the bottom 3 Sacked by Forest as they had zero faith he would keep them up in a league with Luton, Burnley and Shef Utd in it. Literally the only difference inn points is the 3 extra he got vs Russel Martin's Southampton, on course to be the worst Prem team of all time. He'd have been 18th at best right now. Edited 27 February by orangecity23 3
Recommended Posts