Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Lcfc-1992

Wolves Pre Match

By Lcfc-1992, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Iran

Iran

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, phoneticerror said:

You’re not that clueless, I refuse to believe it:

The defence is more of an issue (as evidenced by the previous match) than whichever goalkeeper starts today.

 

Let me put it like this, it wouldn't really matter who you start as goalkeeper today if the goals being conceded are coming from errors in the defence.

  • Like 1
fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Iran said:

The defence is more of an issue (as evidenced by the previous match) than whichever goalkeeper starts today.

 

Let me put it like this, it wouldn't really matter who you start as goalkeeper today if the goals being conceded are coming from errors in the defence.

That is true, but having a competent keeper is a must as that breathes confidence in the people in front of him. The keeper is part of that defence, so I'd rather have Jakub than Ward for that reason. 

  • Like 1
Big_Nige

Big_Nige

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, phoneticerror said:

Yeah but look at Everton at KP the season we went down. Madders penalty gift wrapped to Pickford sent us down.

And we had 4 games left to save ourselves after that game, which included Liverpool and Newcastle

 

After today we have 21 games to play 

FrankieADZ

FrankieADZ

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Iran said:

As I said in the Ward thread: I understand the situation isn't ideal, but if Mads Hermansen isn't fully 100% fit then I would rather Danny Ward to start.

Rather Jakub S start, ward has already shown he's not good enough, 

 

RowlattsFox

RowlattsFox

Posted
Posted

The thing with Cunha is its not a question of whether he is going to be banned. Everyone knows he will be. It's a joke that this can't be decided before the next game, it happened a week a go FFS. Takes a second to give him a ban, if Wolves want to appeal to shortern they can do but he will always miss the next game whatever the ban. 

 

Absolute joke of a system. 

That said I hope Ruud hasn't been focusing on this too much, and gives the players an excuse. Need to beat them, Cunha or not. 

Scotch

Scotch

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, Iran said:

As I said in the Ward thread: I understand the situation isn't ideal, but if Mads Hermansen isn't fully 100% fit then I would rather Danny Ward to start.

I'd prefer a drunk Mads with two broken wrists and a missing eye than a GK who turns side-on in 1v1 situations. 

Danny Ward is afraid of footballs! He is completely useless. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
It'sblueupnorth

It'sblueupnorth

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Iran said:

The defence is more of an issue (as evidenced by the previous match) than whichever goalkeeper starts today.

 

Let me put it like this, it wouldn't really matter who you start as goalkeeper today if the goals being conceded are coming from errors in the defence.

It’s like saying you wouldn’t want to wear a stab vest whilst getting stabbed. Yes we’re minging defensively but why play a gk who literally can’t save shots when added to that

  • Like 1
fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, RowlattsFox said:

The thing with Cunha is its not a question of whether he is going to be banned. Everyone knows he will be. It's a joke that this can't be decided before the next game, it happened a week a go FFS. Takes a second to give him a ban, if Wolves want to appeal to shortern they can do but he will always miss the next game whatever the ban. 

 

Absolute joke of a system. 

That said I hope Ruud hasn't been focusing on this too much, and gives the players an excuse. Need to beat them, Cunha or not. 

It wasn't even like it was debatable either or a situation where it could be one thing or another....it's clear cut as they come. Nothing to debate. If that was at work you'll be suspended instantly and pending investigation as to how long. What happens if it kicks off today? It highly likely won't, but what if it did, the FA will look utter useless. 

 

I hope Vards goes in early on him to rattle him. 

  • Like 1
phoneticerror

phoneticerror

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Big_Nige said:

And we had 4 games left to save ourselves after that game, which included Liverpool and Newcastle

 

After today we have 21 games to play 

You’re missing the point. The point is that one loss against a weak club can affect the whole season. It doesn’t matter when in the season it happens.

st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, fox_favourite said:

It wasn't even like it was debatable either or a situation where it could be one thing or another....it's clear cut as they come. Nothing to debate. If that was at work you'll be suspended instantly and pending investigation as to how long. What happens if it kicks off today? It highly likely won't, but what if it did, the FA will look utter useless. 

 

I hope Vards goes in early on him to rattle him. 

Would give him Thursday night off (which he’s probably getting anyway)

Big_Nige

Big_Nige

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, phoneticerror said:

You’re missing the point. The point is that one loss against a weak club can affect the whole season. It doesn’t matter when in the season it happens.

I can assure you I’m not missing the point, I’m saying there are 22 more games to get the amount of points needed to stay up.
 

Today is a massive game between 2 clubs that will definitely be in the mix come May. To stay up you more than likely need to beat the teams around you, especially at home, but defeat wont mean certain relegation like some people are saying 

 

My point is more around the hyperbole involved in football. One game in a 38 game season played in December does not define your season, but I agree, it can damage it.
 

Drawing at home to your relegation rivals in May and missing a penalty to go 3-1 up, yes that is season defining

 

 

Edited by Big_Nige
phoneticerror

phoneticerror

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Iran said:

The defence is more of an issue (as evidenced by the previous match) than whichever goalkeeper starts today.

 

Let me put it like this, it wouldn't really matter who you start as goalkeeper today if the goals being conceded are coming from errors in the defence.

We’ve never conceded that many in such a short space of time this season. 1-0 at half time, 3-0 after 4 minutes of Ward coming on. Quit being so deluded. Yes defence is shite, but Ward is done.

  • Like 1
HankMarvin

HankMarvin

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Iran said:

The defence is more of an issue (as evidenced by the previous match) than whichever goalkeeper starts today.

 

Let me put it like this, it wouldn't really matter who you start as goalkeeper today if the goals being conceded are coming from errors in the defence.

It does matter

because on average we concede about 20 shots per match.

So if ward starts it could easily be 19 conceded 

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...