Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, Collymore said:

What about if it could be organised that all the boycotters go to the ground still but protest before, during and after the game outside?

 

A few hundred people would be quite noticeable. 

Personally like the idea of having a sore throat from shouting on my team during the game and then shouting about the way this club is being run after it....Brilliant.

Posted

We have flu so have inadvertently joined the boycott. Pity no darts to watch on TV instead of this game, unlike last week.

Posted
1 hour ago, Collymore said:

What about if it could be organised that all the boycotters go to the ground still but protest before, during and after the game outside?

 

A few hundred people would be quite noticeable. 

As said over and over. These can be future plans.

  • Like 3
Posted

So glad I didn't renew this year. Completely disinterested these days with KPFC.

I see the happy clappers are calling themselves the loyal fans that have been there through the good times and bad. Theyre the kind that yearn for midtable championship hoofball and used to berate players like Mahrez and Barnes for daring to do anything with flair.

As far as im concerned the KP brigade and KP themselves have ruined the club beyond recognition.

  • Like 4
Posted

The best part about boycotting, is you can use those 90 mins to kick back and have a drink not having a care in the world about the match happening.

 

Then after 90 mins, open your phone, check the result, see we didn't win, then have a giggle.

Posted
4 hours ago, Sky Blues said:

So an immediate 12 point deduction and that's just the start of it. The bad certainly outweighs the good these days.

Correct... 

How do you see tops stewardship ending?

Posted

I would be interested to know how many of the match going fans, read this forum. It would appear that most of the ones advocating boycotting games, don’t go anyway. Those of us who go to the games do not need the approval of any other fan to do so. I would have thought that vocal disapproval of thousands of fans, would be more effective than a few hundred empty seats. If you really want fans to join in with protest chants, you have to stop indulging yourselves with the C word. But no, you insist on using it, then wonder why not many join in. 

  • Like 3
Posted
19 minutes ago, OnlyOneCity said:

I would be interested to know how many of the match going fans, read this forum. It would appear that most of the ones advocating boycotting games, don’t go anyway. Those of us who go to the games do not need the approval of any other fan to do so. I would have thought that vocal disapproval of thousands of fans, would be more effective than a few hundred empty seats. If you really want fans to join in with protest chants, you have to stop indulging yourselves with the C word. But no, you insist on using it, then wonder why not many join in. 

But it’s not there.

Barely more than a hundred seemed to join in with sack the board the other day.

Posted
20 minutes ago, SemperEadem said:

But it’s not there.

Barely more than a hundred seemed to join in with sack the board the other day.

Can't blame people not joining in if they're isolated either. They've seen what can happen to people voicing their discontent even in biggish groups now.

Posted
43 minutes ago, OnlyOneCity said:

I would be interested to know how many of the match going fans, read this forum. It would appear that most of the ones advocating boycotting games, don’t go anyway. Those of us who go to the games do not need the approval of any other fan to do so. I would have thought that vocal disapproval of thousands of fans, would be more effective than a few hundred empty seats. If you really want fans to join in with protest chants, you have to stop indulging yourselves with the C word. But no, you insist on using it, then wonder why not many join in. 

Who's "you"?

 

Also, your first point is way wide of the mark. No one I know is going and the majority of them are P1 away priority.

 

Your circles aren't representative of the whole fanbase either, remember.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, SemperEadem said:

But it’s not there.

Barely more than a hundred seemed to join in with sack the board the other day.

For future protests, we could take a lesson from history - the 'Pleat Out' years. One lone voice (in the old main stand) straining 'Pllleeeeeeaaaat' ....pause .....then the crowd around (not many I may add, even then) would yell 'OUT'

 

Sack the Board  chants are a bit lame, as there isn't a board. Not in the proper business sense. And Leicester people just aren't very singy full.stop. We're very introvert people/fanbase. 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, LC1884FC said:

Who's "you"?

 

Also, your first point is way wide of the mark. No one I know is going and the majority of them are P1 away priority.

 

Your circles aren't representative of the whole fanbase either, remember.

I don’t have “circles”. My question was reasonable. It didn’t warrant such an obtuse response. If you check back to the many pieces on this subject generally, much of the advice is followed by, “ I stopped going blah blah…….. “.My own little circle of 1, would dearly love to see a big change at the top of my club. Until then, I will carry on supporting whoever wears the shirt on that pitch, but will gladly join in with vocal protests against the hierarchy.

Posted
1 minute ago, OnlyOneCity said:

I don’t have “circles”. My question was reasonable. It didn’t warrant such an obtuse response. If you check back to the many pieces on this subject generally, much of the advice is followed by, “ I stopped going blah blah…….. “.My own little circle of 1, would dearly love to see a big change at the top of my club. Until then, I will carry on supporting whoever wears the shirt on that pitch, but will gladly join in with vocal protests against the hierarchy.

Obtuse? All I asked was who you were referring to when you say "you". 

 

Fair enough you don't know anyone else that goes, but that would make you even less qualified to take the temperature of the wider fanbase.

Posted

I imagine quite a few people wont be going tomorrow night due to the weather, and people with kids may not go as it is night game, so will make the boycott like bigger than it actually is.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, LC1884FC said:

Obtuse? All I asked was who you were referring to when you say "you". 

 

Fair enough you don't know anyone else that goes, but that would make you even less qualified to take the temperature of the wider fanbase.

What are you babbling on about?

Posted
28 minutes ago, Big Dave said:

I imagine quite a few people wont be going tomorrow night due to the weather, and people with kids may not go as it is night game, so will make the boycott like bigger than it actually is.

 

Guarantee Top's minions will report back to him and tell him that it was the weather that affected the attendance

 

Nothing to see here

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Big Dave said:

I imagine quite a few people wont be going tomorrow night due to the weather, and people with kids may not go as it is night game, so will make the boycott like bigger than it actually is.

I'd personally be surprised if there's fewer than 25,000 there tomorrow night. However, if the actual attendance is even lower for the reasons you've mentioned, I'd argue these reasons count as part of the boycott. Were large groups of people missing night games 3 or 4 years ago because of the weather or kids being back at school? Not really. People being prepared to miss games for those reasons is a sign that people are losing interest in going to watch their team because the club is in a bad way. That counts as part if the boycott as far as I'm concern. I'll reiterate though, I'd be surprised if there are more than 6000 empty seats in the home end tomorrow night. 

Edited by BenTheFox
  • Like 2
Posted
32 minutes ago, EastAnglianFox said:

 

Guarantee Top's minions will report back to him and tell him that it was the weather that affected the attendance

 

Nothing to see here

It will be the way the media perceive any action which hurts them more 

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Claudio Fannieri said:

Has there been in much in the way of attention or focus from any of the main LCFC social media reporters such as Percy, Collomose, Tanner, Henry Winter etc etc? 

Tanner's given up on reporting on Leicester.

Posted

I would boycott if I bothered going anymore but I can fully understand season ticket holders going tomorrow if they've paid their hard earned money for their season tickets. 

 

That's the only reason I can possibly imagine for wanting to go though. We're dreadful to watch, boring and will likely lose or get a miserable draw. I know you should support your team through thick and thin and I'll watch it on TV because I have nothing else to do, but I have truly fallen out of love with this club for now. 

 

I had a season ticket in the championship when I lived in Newcastle and went to nearly every game. I wouldn't dream of doing that now. I just really hope I get the love back. 

 

Hope as many of you boycott as possible. 

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...