Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
syston_fox

6 point deduction - confirmed

By syston_fox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Chrysalis said:

Why is the club trying to drag this out instead of moving on?

Because they believe PSR = Please Save Rudkin (he's blameless)

  • Haha 1
EastAnglianFox

EastAnglianFox

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, kingpower said:

felt like a good choice at the time but now feel like I've got a target on my back lol


Change it to KingPowerOut in the forum support thread 👍

moore_94

moore_94

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Benji said:

Don't fancy reading the full report but is it fair to say that if we'd just have complied with filing accounts etc rather than arguing at every stage, we'd have just received 2 points for the overspend...?

Nah we didn’t get anything for that stuff, it was all entirely for the overspend

 

14. The Commission recommends to the EFL an immediate six point deduction to be applied in the Championship in respect of LCFC’s breach of the P&S Rules. This comprises:

 

14.1. the starting point of seven points based on the percentage overspend; and

 

14.2. a reduction of one point reflecting LCFC’s positive financial trend in FY24 as mitigation.

 

Edited by moore_94
  • Like 4
btswift94

btswift94

Posted
Posted


It is possible to place the blame of this on King Power’s running of the club and want change whilst also being critical of the Premier League’s clear double standards when it comes to the elite clubs. 
 

They aren’t mutually exclusive. 

  • Like 1
The boy Linacre

The boy Linacre

Posted
Posted

I suspect a dereliction of duty by the top 2.  I just can't fathom how Top can see this repeated failure over the last 5 years and not look to change things.

Is he really just a Nepo baby and has NO business acumen whatsoever?  Rudkin has got no financial or acquisition decisions right since we first went down if not before.

Saw the 1st's minute of Top's interview last week, the guy is deluded.

Do whatever you can to stay up, support King or whoever in whatever way to make sure we survive.

Get rid of Rudkin, he's failed REPEATEDLY and acknowledge that much of the title win was down to Walsh, Pearson, Ranieri & Shakespeare.

The ONLY people responsible for this financial calamity is those 2 and shut the door to players.....they report ONLY to the manager.

Get on with it........

  • Like 3
Terraloon

Terraloon

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Spudulike said:

It's going to be interesting what the effect will be on this seasons relegated clubs, Wolves, West Ham? Notts F :fc:, in respect of Point 11 over the 37 months. One or two of the established clubs is likely to go down with unsellable players on massive long-term contracts.

It’s why clubs get parachute payments. 

 

Club after club have been relegated but don’t fall foul of the FFP spends. Look at Southampton and even Ipswich for instance these  clubs have managed to move players and reduced wage bills. 
 

In the written reasons it makes it pretty clear that the alarm bells were ringing in a season where the club had budgeted to sell a high value player ( so high it seems that no one was interested) and had built into its cash flow an 8th place finish.

 

 

  • Like 2
Mike Oxlong

Mike Oxlong

Posted
Posted

 

Now that we have the sanction I'm looking forward to the accountability, full explanation, apology, and change of personnel so that we move out those responsible and bringing in competent replacements  🤔

 
  •  
AjcW

AjcW

Posted
Posted

Thought the foxes trust statement is the best they’ve ever done. Within the realms of not being kicked out of the FAB.

  • Like 1
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Terraloon said:

It’s why clubs get parachute payments. 

 

Club after club have been relegated but don’t fall foul of the FFP spends. Look at Southampton and even Ipswich for instance these  clubs have managed to move players and reduced wage bills. 
 

In the written reasons it makes it pretty clear that the alarm bells were ringing in a season where the club had budgeted to sell a high value player ( so high it seems that no one was interested) and had built into its cash flow an 8th place finish.

 

 

Did we receive larger para payments due to our previous good placements in the league ? 

Twitcher

Twitcher

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, hackneyfox said:

We didn’t avoid a points deduction, there was nothing in the rules about a points deduction for going into admin. Many clubs had gone into admin before us and similarly hadn’t been hit with a points deduction. We had the audacity to go bust and still get promoted (more than ten points ahead of the team in third).

Yes but the points deduction came in immediately after that. We dodged a bullet.

ClaphamFox

ClaphamFox

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Twitcher said:

Yes but the points deduction came in immediately after that. We dodged a bullet.

Can you dodge a bullet from a gun that didn't even exist at the time?

  • Like 1
Chrysalis

Chrysalis

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Mike Oxlong said:

 

 

Now that we have the sanction I'm looking forward to the accountability, full explanation, apology, and change of personnel so that we move out those responsible and bringing in competent replacements  🤔

 
  •  

Seems more like deniability at the moment.

Terraloon

Terraloon

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Did we receive larger para payments due to our previous good placements in the league ? 

.Bear in mind  those “ good placements “ generated bigger payments so maybe not parachute payments but those good placements were well rewarded

 

 

  • Like 1
JJD_LCFC

JJD_LCFC

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, LCFCJohn said:

How can you say the deduction has no impact on us with 16 games left to go? Just because it’s left us out of the relegation places on GD now, does mean that is going to stay the case. We are awful, a one man team who is now out injured. If they were doing as you say, with us in free fall on the pitch, they’d have waited until later in the season or the end of the season.

I do agree we play like a 1 man team.
I think 6 points is lenient for cheating. We should have accepted this in the premier league and not had this drag on a while. 

6 points gives us a chance to stay up. We do not deserve to though, we lost at home to Oxford and Charlton. 


No accountability at the top, dire management from directors, manager who was a nice guy by all accounts but ultimate proved useless, and players who are vastly overpaid and think they are  better than others. Our formation and tactics remain the same regardless of any opposition and we have conceded in 20+ games in a row and still change nothing. 
We deserve to go down off the pitch and as a result we play like it too. 
 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...