Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, ClaphamFox said:

Yes we would've.

Yep I think that too.

 

But also I know they have made some stupid decisions too. So nothing would surprise me.

Posted

It will be interesting where this story of administration has come from ( not happening btw). If it’s from us, it might be to entice offers we want, if it’s come from outside, its to justify a low offer Or to reduce the asking price.  

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

Ben Jacobs leading us to believe he has insider info on a deal where everyone involved will be NDA'd through their b0llocks. What a pr1ck.

In his piece on TalkSport he stated that none of the prospective buyers have had full access to our accounts yet, hence why they've only been required to submit indicative bids. Yet at the same time he spoke as if he personally has inside info on those accounts. I find this implausible.

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

Ben Jacobs leading us to believe he has insider info on a deal where everyone involved will be NDA'd through their b0llocks. What a pr1ck.

Saw the clip from Talksport yesterday and it was probably the most pointless 10 mins of that show I've seen (which is saying a lot!). Absolutely no decent information

Posted
1 hour ago, ClaphamFox said:

Well that would be a risky strategy given that administration comes with a 12-point deduction and would likely kill our chances of getting promoted this season—which could potentially set us back much further given the likelihood of a forced fire sale next summer. Surely any buyer will want us to get back to the Championship asap?

There is currently a lot of noise about administration, but that's all it is—noise. Our latest set of accounts disclosed that the club has access to an undrawn £10m of a five-year loan facility with the KP Group and a further £116m of an undrawn equity-funding mechanism to support cash flow in a 'severe downside scenario'. In other words, the club has already included a provision to keep us going through to the end of this season at least. Our recent player acquisitions and the £8.5m debt-to-equity conversion are entirely consistent with that. So I'm curious to know exactly what these "admin by Christmas" claims are based on.

We'll find out soon, according to Alex Crook on Talksport this morning we're charging players £80 per night to stay at the Seagrave hotel before home games 😂 

Posted
1 minute ago, trooky said:

We'll find out soon, according to Alex Crook on Talksport this morning we're charging players £80 per night to stay at the Seagrave hotel before home games 😂 

Only if its the players choice not if they have been asked to stay by the club i think.

  • Like 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, davieG said:

Leicester City truth revealed over viral claim players have to pay to stay at club's own hotel | Leicestershire Live

 

Brian Dick Reach Football Correspondent
10:10, 16 Sep 2026
Leicester City players have to pay to stay at the club’s training ground – on nights they choose to stay, LeicestershireLive understands.

However, Russell Martin’s men are not charged for nights on which they are required to remain at Seagrave.

The new information obtained by LeicestershireLive comes after a report by talkSPORT that players were having to pay £80 a night just to sleep in the hotel at their £100million training base.

The move is part of a drive to encourage City players to live closer to the club rather than spend hours on a daily commute.

I'm sure a couple  of £80 amonth with the money  their on ain't  going  to make any players live closer .

  • Like 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, mod hero said:

If we were close to admin we would’ve sold Page to Man yoo surely?

and accepted an offer for Souttar.. Also not spent 1m plus on 3/4 separate transfers.

Posted
4 hours ago, DJ Barry Hammond said:

 

This would be a strange outcome for the near future considering the club has signed several players for significant transfer fees over the last couple of months.

 

That muted summer transfer budget of £10 million back at the start of the window sounds about right - well you’re not shelling those sums if administration is close.

 

It is also be notable that the reported £8.5 million debt clearance/equity swap (funding injection) by King Power is a lot lower than previous ones; that might suggest the clubs annual operating losses up to the point of last season had become more manageable; but we’ll need the clubs accounts to confirm that.

What I find strange is the fact you think what you've said is strange when the comments are about two fvckwits.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Saxondale said:

That Neil Lal is absolutely clueless!

 

There’s no way he’s buying the club and god help us if he does.

 

In his weird, attention-seeking TalkSport interview, he referred to us as “Leicester Football Club” 19 times.

 

He appears to have almost no understanding of how football clubs or their finances work.

 

He was talking about maximising revenues as if he’s the first person in the world to notice that commercial success can benefit the sporting operation. He also seemed shocked that LCFC makes a loss - are there any professional football clubs that make a profit?

 

It would be extraordinarily dangerous if this bloke and his consortium acquired the club. 
 

That’s before we consider the fact that it would probably be some kind of leveraged buy out.


 

he’ll make the players buy their own kit. Charge them for meals at seagrave and if we think the club shop is  expensive, just you wait!

 

he’s got a point about India being a relatively untapped market, but if he could be from a country with a stronger currency that would be great! lol

 

ob and be prepared for all our pre-season tours to be in India. In August.

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, trooky said:

We'll find out soon, according to Alex Crook on Talksport this morning we're charging players £80 per night to stay at the Seagrave hotel before home games 😂 

If a player asks to spend a night at Seagrave, the club is charging them a massively discounted £80 per night for the privilege. Please don't tell me you actually believe this indicates that administration is nigh.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

If a player asks to spend a night at Seagrave, the club is charging them a massively discounted £80 per night for the privilege. Please don't tell me you actually believe this indicates that administration is nigh.

I think it's more to do with the fact that why start charging players now and also the fact that (from what i can see) no other club charges their players. If they were trying to do it to "encourage" players to live closer, it's the most dim-witted way of doing so

Edited by hejammy
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, mod hero said:

If we were close to admin we would’ve sold Page to Man yoo surely?

Never underestimate the stupidity of these owners. 
Remember we promote this season…….

We currently have an owner who still hasn’t got a clue how financial fair play works so I wouldn’t hold out any hope of him knowing if we’re close to administration. 

Edited by winteriscoming
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, AKCJ said:

Thanks for that Brian Dick Reach.

i know what a dick, lets encourage them to stay at the training ground rather than commuting by charging them lol  this dick guy is wind up gaff?

Posted
56 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

In his piece on TalkSport he stated that none of the prospective buyers have had full access to our accounts yet, hence why they've only been required to submit indicative bids. Yet at the same time he spoke as if he personally has inside info on those accounts. I find this implausible.

Absolutely - first round you never have ''access to accounts'' anyway, secondly it's not access to ''accounts'' either, LCFC will have had to engage with Big 4 or similar to provide some Financial and Tax DD reports, which will then be made available. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

If a player asks to spend a night at Seagrave, the club is charging them a massively discounted £80 per night for the privilege. Please don't tell me you actually believe this indicates that administration is nigh.

Of course not, it's a pretty stupid and pointless charge for employees. 

 

Its making the national sports news which only fuels the whole administration narrative in the press. 

Edited by trooky

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...