Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It took us a while to find our feet at this level and, ultimately, that's what will likely seal our fate. Can't knock the fight we've shown over the last couple of months. 

  • Like 2
Posted
34 minutes ago, EastAnglianFox said:

Glamorgan players should put in a complaint about their own pitch to try and avoid anymore embarrassment lol

They need to prepare a 22 yard snooker table with matchsticks for stumps for them to see out a day’s play at the crease.

Posted
10 hours ago, Officer Doofy said:

How does Lords get through an entire season then? 

I’m assuming they try and prepare the best pitch possible. 

 

8 hours ago, when_you're_smiling said:

I appreciate the detailed reply. But you still need to have an ‘average’ to mark something ‘below average’. 
 

Hopefully it’s not just because the losing side moaned about it, because that’s what it feels like.

There is no average mark unfortunately although I do understand your frustration as it seems like we are being picked on. 
Coach interference is rife in cricket and particularly at Leicester and we’ve been caught out this time and it’s going to have a huge impact on our season. 

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, James and his giant peach said:

I get what the excellent poster has stated above but all things considered surely they have to look at the pattern of the game? We were bowled out for 150 in the 1st inns. How and why would we prepare a pitch for that? We didnt get an unfair advantage, no one was Injured, it produced a close game where it was hard to bat on but not impossible. I hope common sense prevails and we don't get a points deduction. I think that would set a very dangerous precedent. 

I do apologise for banging on about the same things but I do again feel the need to reply. By my understanding we prepared what would be called a “result” pitch, meaning it was never going to be a draw, this is fine as in the case of the Yorkshire pitch as the pitch played well, a good contest between bat and ball, on the other hand the Glamorgan pitch although looking like it was prepared similarly to the previous Yorkshire pitch didn’t provide an even contest between bat and ball as there was plenty of seam early on and also uneven bounce. That is what the ECB will be reviewing, unfortunately as I’ve previously said the pattern of the game by my understanding is not taken into account, going 4 days and 2 batters making 90+ may help us but it’s unlikely. 
I think we have to prove that we attempted to prepare the best pitch we possibly could for the game but we’ve left ourselves in a difficult position as we purposely cut the pitch two different lengths.


On a side note personally I’d allow the home ground to do what they want with pitches (within reason) and have home advantage, it certainly would make batters value their wicket and play on a variety of pitches which eventually will produce better technique. 
England seem to be able to do what they want with home test match pitches but that doesn’t apply to the County game. 
Sorry for the long winded response 🤣 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Mark 'expert' Lawrenson said:

 

1 hour ago, Mark 'expert' Lawrenson said:

I do apologise for banging on about the same things but I do again feel the need to reply. By my understanding we prepared what would be called a “result” pitch, meaning it was never going to be a draw, this is fine as in the case of the Yorkshire pitch as the pitch played well, a good contest between bat and ball, on the other hand the Glamorgan pitch although looking like it was prepared similarly to the previous Yorkshire pitch didn’t provide an even contest between bat and ball as there was plenty of seam early on and also uneven bounce. That is what the ECB will be reviewing, unfortunately as I’ve previously said the pattern of the game by my understanding is not taken into account, going 4 days and 2 batters making 90+ may help us but it’s unlikely. 
I think we have to prove that we attempted to prepare the best pitch we possibly could for the game but we’ve left ourselves in a difficult position as we purposely cut the pitch two different lengths.


On a side note personally I’d allow the home ground to do what they want with pitches (within reason) and have home advantage, it certainly would make batters value their wicket and play on a variety of pitches which eventually will produce better technique. 
England seem to be able to do what they want with home test match pitches but that doesn’t apply to the County game. 
Sorry for the long winded response 🤣 

I do hope that they take into account that nearly 800 runs were scored, it was a fantastic, exciting game of cricket that either side could have won & would have attracted people to go & watch the game. In my opinion counties that prepare featherbed wickets where each team scores 600 & a draw is the only possible result should be reported. There is a health risk here of bowlers dieing of exhaustion in bowling numerous overs in a futile attempt to get a wicket & spectators dieing of boredom

  • Like 1
Posted

Adam witty is an absolutely atrocious cricket commentator. I was prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt at first because he's new and cricket commentary can be a fine art but he doesn't seem to be improving or learning from the older more superior old boys he's working with at all. 

 

He makes it almost unwatchable for me he need to learn and learn fast that good cricket commentary isn't filling every silence with inane nonsense you've got to let the action breath also when you do interject or have a natter to your co commentator it should bring value and improve the experience for the listenter. 

 

After 3/4 days of listening to him I feel like driving my car into the central reservation. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, The whole world smiles said:

Adam witty is an absolutely atrocious cricket commentator. I was prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt at first because he's new and cricket commentary can be a fine art but he doesn't seem to be improving or learning from the older more superior old boys he's working with at all. 

 

He makes it almost unwatchable for me he need to learn and learn fast that good cricket commentary isn't filling every silence with inane nonsense you've got to let the action breath also when you do interject or have a natter to your co commentator it should bring value and improve the experience for the listenter. 

 

After 3/4 days of listening to him I feel like driving my car into the central reservation. 

Agreed. I'm not really sure he has that much knowledge of the game & certainly his knowledge of Leicestershire's history & former players is dire.

 

All the other counties still seem to have their established BBC commentators who have been following their side for years. Frankly it's a bit of an embarresment what has with Radio Leicester

Posted
21 hours ago, Ted Maul said:

It took us a while to find our feet at this level and, ultimately, that's what will likely seal our fate. Can't knock the fight we've shown over the last couple of months. 

It was that first game of the season v Sussex which screwed us. After that we more than held our own despite the Essex collapse. We are basically a win away from mid table (ignoring the points deduction).

  • Like 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Angus Scott said:

Agreed. I'm not really sure he has that much knowledge of the game & certainly his knowledge of Leicestershire's history & former players is dire.

 

All the other counties still seem to have their established BBC commentators who have been following their side for years. Frankly it's a bit of an embarresment what has with Radio Leicester

Disagree the knowledge of most local commentators are poor.The other guy commentating yesterday asked if Jack Leech was coming in as nightwatchman when Somerset were 7 or 8 down.Adam Whitty plays cricket to a good level and. has a better Knowledge of Leicester cricket then Richard Rae who thought Gower had left Leicestershire when we won the B\H in 1985 and asked Andy Roberts if he enjoyed bowling with Alan Mullally.Also remember him saying Geoff Miller was a former Leicestershire player.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Lionator said:

Josh Blake confirmed to be joining us from Surrey. Is a keeper so I fear the worst re Cox. 

Just looked at his stats. 27 years old and only played 2 T20 games. I reckon Tattersall will take over as the 1st choice. 

Edited by Walshy5
Posted
12 minutes ago, HybridFox said:

Cue the next ECB points deduction for endangering player safety :rolleyes:

 

Screenshot_20260910_130324_Instagram.jpg

You joke about it but it wouldn't surprise me!

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Lionator said:

Josh Blake confirmed to be joining us from Surrey. Is a keeper so I fear the worst re Cox. 

Cricinfo say that Cox is likely to be leaving, in the article about Blake.

Posted

I mean we have had injuries yes but it has been a poorly assembled squad. Seems unlucky with late drop outs but in red ball cricket our overseas have awful. Arguably weaker even on paper than we were last year.

 

I guess with maharaj and handscombe it’s a different season all together. 

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...