Tielemans63 Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 I'm surprised at the low marks for Welbeck. I thought he held the ball up well, ran the channels and even made some defensive contributions last night. Thought he had a good first tournament tbh.
chris_lcfc_85 Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Makes me laugh reading this, its just like our player ratings week after week, some silly scores! I personally dont think anyone deserves the likes of 2's and 3's, thats stupid. Terry. Hart, Cole, Gerrard, Lescott and Parker all had good tournaments. Yes Parker is probably overrated but thats not his fault. All he can do is give his all and he did so all tournament, throwing himself in front of the ball and making numerous blocks. He lacks the class on the ball compared to Pirlo, Xaxi etc. Most others had steady tournaments like Johnson, Welbeck, Milner, Walcott etc. Milner, similar to Parker, played to his capabilities, he's not a right winger and never will be but at least he tried. Welbeck did well for his first tournament, more to come from him for sure. He along with the other forwards had it tough as just simply no support from others. Rooney wasnt awful like some are saying, he just wasnt 100% fit but he did try and worked hard. My only 2 x gripes was that we didnt play Oxlade Chamberlain and Walcott more and, as much as i love Roy, he got it tactically wrong last night, being that defensive was ridiculous. The young players will benefit from this experience though and should make them stronger, even the likes of Henderson and Kelly etc. Quarters is no disgrace so well done Roy, bring on the World Cup
MattyFromLE Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Makes me laugh reading this, its just like our player ratings week after week, some silly scores! I personally dont think anyone deserves the likes of 2's and 3's, thats stupid. Terry. Hart, Cole, Gerrard, Lescott and Parker all had good tournaments. Yes Parker is probably overrated but thats not his fault. All he can do is give his all and he did so all tournament, throwing himself in front of the ball and making numerous blocks. He lacks the class on the ball compared to Pirlo, Xaxi etc. Most others had steady tournaments like Johnson, Welbeck, Milner, Walcott etc. Milner, similar to Parker, played to his capabilities, he's not a right winger and never will be but at least he tried. Welbeck did well for his first tournament, more to come from him for sure. He along with the other forwards had it tough as just simply no support from others. Rooney wasnt awful like some are saying, he just wasnt 100% fit but he did try and worked hard. My only 2 x gripes was that we didnt play Oxlade Chamberlain and Walcott more and, as much as i love Roy, he got it tactically wrong last night, being that defensive was ridiculous. The young players will benefit from this experience though and should make them stronger, even the likes of Henderson and Kelly etc. Quarters is no disgrace so well done Roy, bring on the World Cup This is spot on. However, I think Ashley Young has a lot to answer for. He looked short of confidence, wouldn't take a man on. For gods sake he's quick, got a few tricks and a decent cross - use them! Most infuriating winger I have ever seen. Maybe it was the wrong side for him, but even so. Give it a go! Disappointed for last night obviously but, I think we did well against Italy. Technically, we are still unbeaten - all be a penalty shoot out where it becomes a game of nerves/composure and luck.
chris_lcfc_85 Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 This is spot on. However, I think Ashley Young has a lot to answer for. He looked short of confidence, wouldn't take a man on. For gods sake he's quick, got a few tricks and a decent cross - use them! Most infuriating winger I have ever seen. Maybe it was the wrong side for him, but even so. Give it a go! Disappointed for last night obviously but, I think we did well against Italy. Technically, we are still unbeaten - all be a penalty shoot out where it becomes a game of nerves/composure and luck. Yes you make a fair point. I thought Young was going to be our main man int he tournament but turned out to be the opposite. He just seemed to lack confidence all the way through, maybe the Ox should of started. Italy got it tactically better than we did, simples really
Daggers Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 I'm surprised at the low marks for Welbeck. I thought he held the ball up well, ran the channels and even made some defensive contributions last night. Thought he had a good first tournament tbh. Welbeck had a great tournament until he was forced to partner the incredible under-performing Rooney. Even then he struggled on to try to create despite Rooney's best efforts to throw matches and long-ball tactics which don't build on his abilities.
MooseBreath Posted 25 June 2012 Author Posted 25 June 2012 Rooney and Young our two worst performers and Welbeck arguably third. What's the connection? Wonder if a certain Scottish football manager might be telling these lads where their priorities should lie.
AyewJoking Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 To summerize I think the defence had a good tournament. Hart was solid, so too were Cole, Terry, Lescott and Johnson. Johnson has his critics and personally I rate Richards and Walker ahead of him but he made vital contributions throughout this tournament. The midfield. Gerrard and Parker excelled whilst Milner was average. Young just didnt turn up and Walcott had his usual effective 20 minutes then did little. Chamberlain is one for the future and Henderson didnt fúck it up. The strikers. Rooney yet again failed to deliver in a major tournament, Carrol impressed me and justified his inclusion in the squad. Welbeck did very well. Qualifying for the Quarters was a good achievement for this squad its just a shame they bottled it (again) on the night.
Father Ted Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 People are being harsh on Milner and I hope he isnt turned into the scapegoat. He worked tirelessly, had a good partnership with Johnson and stuck some good balls in the box. On the other hand, Young has been found out to be the one trick pony that he is, all he can do is cut in and hit it. Defensively shite too. The back 4 were fantastic and for me man of the tournament was Terry. I hope thats shut Rio up now and that perhaps JT was picked ahead of him because he is a much much better CB.
foxfanazer Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Hart-7 G.Johnson-7 Terry-8 Lescott-7.5 Cole-7 Milner- 5.5 Gerrard- 8 Parker-7 Young-4 Rooney-3 Welbeck 7.5 Carroll-6.5
foxfanazer Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Rooney and Young our two worst performers and Welbeck arguably third. What's the connection? Wonder if a certain Scottish football manager might be telling these lads where their priorities should lie. Welbeck was superb?
AyewJoking Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 People are being harsh on Milner and I hope he isnt turned into the scapegoat. He worked tirelessly, had a good partnership with Johnson and stuck some good balls in the box. On the other hand, Young has been found out to be the one trick pony that he is, all he can do is cut in and hit it. Defensively shite too. The back 4 were fantastic and for me man of the tournament was Terry. I hope thats shut Rio up now and that perhaps JT was picked ahead of him because he is a much much better CB. Is Milner a natural wide player? He was at his best in his Villa days. Did he play in the middle or is it just me??? Maybe could replace Gerrard/Lampard/Parker in the next world cup.
bmt Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 I don't understand how everyone doesn't think Glen Johnson has been appalling. He lost the ball under limited pressure so many times last night it wasn't even funny, and that has been the story of his tournament. Often a liability in defence also, his positioning is frequently all over the place.
AyewJoking Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 I don't understand how everyone doesn't think Glen Johnson has been appalling. He lost the ball under limited pressure so many times last night it wasn't even funny, and that has been the story of his tournament. Often a liability in defence also, his positioning is frequently all over the place. He covered for our slow central defenders and saved us on at least one occasion. I think Johnson had a decent tournament.
MC Prussian Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Given the injury woes and the amount of absences, I think England did fairly well. Can't really fault a single player or a group of players for not showing up. If at all, put the blame on Hodgson who decided to play it ultra-safe against Italy and for his love of Liverpool players (an experiment that only partially succeeded - Gerrard, Johnson and Carroll played well, Henderson I saw only little of and it didn't convince me). Carroll, Defoe and Welbeck did well enough to cover for the missing Rooney in the first two games, Carroll in particular usually tracked back and also helped out in midfield. Ashley Young and Parker were a bit luckless and had little influence on all four games they starred in.
MooseBreath Posted 25 June 2012 Author Posted 25 June 2012 Welbeck was superb? Absolutely not. Nothing was expected of him so he exceeded expectations by scoring a goal, but he is a hell of a long way from being classed as superb at this level. He was poor relative to his peers on other teams.
Corky Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Maybe but I am not even frustrated, that match was absolutely terrible. Typical England again, 1 shot on target in 120 mins is awful absolutely flaming awful. Roy was bias and picked Liverpool players, just to get Liverpool fans back on side. A significant amount of Liverpool fans do not care for the England team. So he has no reason to "get them back on side".
foxfanazer Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Absolutely not. Nothing was expected of him so he exceeded expectations by scoring a goal, but he is a hell of a long way from being classed as superb at this level. He was poor relative to his peers on other teams. Ok maybe superb is a bit too much but he certainly wasn't the 3rd worst player in the team
ScouseFox Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Defence as a whole - 8. Hart 7 - Good enough, no major errors like most that have gone before him. Two clean sheets, too. Johnson 7.5 - I was a "Richards or nobody" man before the squad was selected and was scared at quite how shit we'd be down our right but Johnson had a very good tournament, justified his selection. Terry 9 - Our best centre back. Everyone has forgotten Gary Cahill even got injured and Rio has shut the fúck up. Star man for me. Lescott 8.5 - Along with Terry, solid. Not much got past the pair of them. Two set piece goals against Sweden and a long range effort from Nasri. Cole 7.5 - Exactly what everyone has seen from him for about 12 years. Solid, gets forward, rarely gets beaten. Midfield as a whole - 6 Milner 6 - Not the best going forward, but he was never going to be. Worked well with Glen. Bit unlucky to be slated by everyone, although he could've been better. Parker 6 - Pretty poor on the ball but he'll lose it then win it back. Gerrard 8 - Nobody in the whole tournament whipped in balls better than him. Covered defensively very well too. Was nullified yesterday, though, and it showed. Young 4 - Didn't beat a man once, didn't get an assist, didn't look like creating anything or scoring. Generally very poor. Walcott 6.5 - Decent in the small spells we saw of him. Ox 5 - Alright. Henderson - Barely touched the ball. Not enough to get a decent rating. Attack as a whole - 5.5 Welbeck 7 - For a youngster in his first comp, he did well. Got a goal, ran channels, led the line well. Unlucky to have Rooney alongside him. Carroll 7 - Same as Welbeck really. Fantastic goal against Sweden, put himself about, bashed some Italian defenders and should've continued to start after Sweden. Rooney 4.5 - Unfit, very slow, missed a host of chances and ruined what was looking like a decent combination between Welbz and Carroll. Bit shit really. Defoe - Like Henderson, touched the ball about once.
okie fox Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Hart -7- Decent except for a couple of shaky moments Johnson -7- Made some vital covering tackles. Gets caught out sometimes. Slow on offside traps. Terry -8- Because he is slow, the defence cannot play a high line. Nevertheless made some vital blocks and tackles. Lescott -7- Solid, reliable. Roy's system enables defenders to shine. Cole -7- Decent. Milner -5- No threat going forward, covers a lot of ground with little impact. Parker -6- Lot of work, worn down at end. Gerrard -7- Good except ineffective versus Italy. Young -4- Completely devoid of confidence. Walcott -7- Provided threat down right wing, should have started more often. Oxlade-Chamberlain -6- Promising, ran at opposition. Henderson -5- Not good enough yet at this level. Welbeck -7- Mostly good considering little decent crosses from wings. Carroll -6- Heading good, but not good with ball at his feet. Rooney -5- Flopped again on the big stage, careless in possession. Defoe -6- OK in the few minutes he was given. Roy -5- Unimaginative. Selected team to park bus, not to cause opponents any worries. Pirlo not closed down.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Hart- 6 Johnson- 8 Lescott- 8 Terry- 8 Cole- 4 Milner- 4 Gerrard- 4.5 Parker- 6.5 Young- 1 Rooney- 2 Welbeck- 4.5 Carroll- 6.5 Walcott- 7 Let me guess, cos he missed a penalty? Pillock!
Matt Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Quite a few players came out of this tournament with credit - Joe Hart, Joleon Lescott (Who I have slagged off alot in the past), John Terry as much as I hate to admit it because I hate the cunt, but you can't deny he played quite well (Had a poor season though), Ashley Cole played very well, Steven Gerrard (Best tournament from him), Theo Walcott did quite well, and Andy Carroll played well. There rest were quite poor really. Rooney - I can see why we played him and if he played like he does for Man Utd you have to play him - Unfortunatly for some reason he doesn't bring this form into England games, I think we were a worse team having him in the team when he came back from suspension, should have maybe stuck with Carroll. I think everyone has gone abit overboard on the 'we're still shit' e.t.c - Not necessarily on here (I don't know if anyone has got that attitude on here i've not really read any of the threads) but elsewhere I have seen, read and heard alot of people slagging the team off. I think we did well, last night we were poor and Ukraine was poor, but there was improvement and let's be honest I think we all got caught up in the hype as usual especially when we played so well and came back against Sweden, but pre-tournament we all (I did anyway, I think I can speak for most) expect nothing, the team surprised me alot and as I said i've seen improvement.
Webbo Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Walcott had a good cameo against Sweden but he didn't do anything in the other games.
Guest MattP Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Hart -7- Did very well, our number one for many a year. Johnson -7- Far better than previous, looks better with a defensive midfielder in front. Terry -8- Outstanding, made the Rio backers look ridiculous. Lescott -7- Excellent Cole -7- Did well, shame about the penalty. Milner -5- No threat going forward, covers a lot of ground with little impact. Parker -6- Shattered, showed why he needs Modric next to him. Gerrard -7- Excellent, crosses fantastic, was shite in the QF though Young -2 - can't think of a good word to say, totally out of his depth, shows how far Man U have slipped hes classed as a big player. Walcott -6 good impact player but too little too often Oxlade-Chamberlain -6- not yet ready Henderson -5- Still no idea why he is there. Welbeck - 6 - Pretty poor, again the fact people think he was impressive says own standards have slipped, this used to be a national team that Ferdinand and Fowler couldn't get in Carroll - 7 - Should have played more. Rooney -2 - Exactly what I expected, England most consistent player in major tournaments, standard of performance same every time. See you in 2014 when he'll be shit yet again but of course "we have to play him". Defoe -4 - Pointless. Roy -8 - Did well on short notice to get this lot out the group stage.
leicesterisme Posted 25 June 2012 Posted 25 June 2012 Let me guess, cos he missed a penalty? Pillock! Wouldn't surprise me, absolutely clueless.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.