Mark_w Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 david nugent â€@nuge101235 Beckford would of gone Leeds anyway if they could of afforded him. Expand Reply Retweet Favorite I wonder what is the hidden message for this 1? That you aren't funny? Then again you've never done a good job of hiding it in previous posts.
Guest Col city fan Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 Have you read through his tweets? Next to nothing and really not worth people talking about Nugent leaving or falling out with Pearson. No mate, don't get me wrong, of course I'm not talking about fallings out or anyone leaving the club. Call me old fashioned... ... But I think matters of the club, including players opinions, whether they be said 'tongue in cheek' or not, should stay within the club. Boring bar steward I may be (... Shit that's opened me up for some insults.. ) but I reckon it's from little things like this that bigger issues can grow. I know if I were Pearson and found out that any of my players were tweeting little comments like this, I'd frown a little.. Just a little... And the seed of doubt may be sown. Just mi opinion and I could be way off the mark. I'm just saying how I think I'd react.
5waller5 Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 Why you bored? You were all for it not long ago. Is there a "grow up" emoticon?
Jace Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 That you aren't funny? Then again you've never done a good job of hiding it in previous posts. david nugent â€@nuge101235 Playing for Leicester City used to be much better when Sven was in charge and Mark_W wasn't on Foxestalk Expand Reply Retweet Favorite
sphericalfox Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 david nugent â€@nuge101235 Playing for Leicester City used to be much better when Sven was in charge and Mark_W wasn't on Foxestalk Expand Reply Retweet Favorite That's not 140 characters! What the deuce?
Jace Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 That's not 140 characters! What the deuce? Twitter made an exception for this tweet
Daggers Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 I'd be more worried if he was happy bring on the bench. Just a bit of banter, nothing to have a controversy wank about. Bring on the wall.
Babylon Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 No mate, don't get me wrong, of course I'm not talking about fallings out or anyone leaving the club. Call me old fashioned... ... But I think matters of the club, including players opinions, whether they be said 'tongue in cheek' or not, should stay within the club. Boring bar steward I may be (... Shit that's opened me up for some insults.. ) but I reckon it's from little things like this that bigger issues can grow. I know if I were Pearson and found out that any of my players were tweeting little comments like this, I'd frown a little.. Just a little... And the seed of doubt may be sown. Just mi opinion and I could be way off the mark. I'm just saying how I think I'd react. But surely if Pearson doesn't come out and make a statement to satisfy a few keyboard warriors that means there is a problem between them? I mean, Pearson is known throughout football as being very open and talkative about everything. So him not commenting on pure speculation has to be a clear indication of a problem. He usually spends hours answering Stringers silly questions without as much as batting an eyelid. So for one I will be concerned if nothing is said, and could possibly only draw one conclusion from it... trouble.
5waller5 Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 That's not 140 characters! What the deuce? I can't believe you counted!!!
Babylon Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 Is there a "grow up" emoticon? No but there is a I'm out my depth, I'll try and make out I'm above it all emoticon. It's this...
Jace Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 I can't believe you counted!!! I think the joke is the amount of characters used is the most questionable thing about the tweet
marty78 Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 No mate, don't get me wrong, of course I'm not talking about fallings out or anyone leaving the club. Call me old fashioned... ... But I think matters of the club, including players opinions, whether they be said 'tongue in cheek' or not, should stay within the club. Boring bar steward I may be (... Shit that's opened me up for some insults.. ) but I reckon it's from little things like this that bigger issues can grow. I know if I were Pearson and found out that any of my players were tweeting little comments like this, I'd frown a little.. Just a little... And the seed of doubt may be sown. Just mi opinion and I could be way off the mark. I'm just saying how I think I'd react. I think players have to be allowed to tweet if they so wish but there is no reason the club couldn't take disciplinary action should a player cross the line. Whether he tweets about not playing or keeps things to himself he will still kick off about not playing if he is pissed off enough. If Pearson can't handle this situation then we have much bigger problems than twitter to think about.
AKCJ Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 Daved Nugint @newge1838773239259854r8474235 I plaid for Engerland once
Guest Col city fan Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 But surely if Pearson doesn't come out and make a statement to satisfy a few keyboard warriors that means there is a problem between them? I mean, Pearson is known throughout football as being very open and talkative about everything. So him not commenting on pure speculation has to be a clear indication of a problem. He usually spends hours answering Stringers silly questions without as much as batting an eyelid. So for one I will be concerned if nothing is said, and could possibly only draw one conclusion from it... trouble. I ain't very bright Babs.. Was that you agreeing with what I posted, or disagreeing? Genuine question.
Daggers Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 Daved Nugint @newge1838773239259854r8474235 I plaid for Engerland once No need to check that.
Guest Col city fan Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 I think players have to be allowed to tweet if they so wish but there is no reason the club couldn't take disciplinary action should a player cross the line. Whether he tweets about not playing or keeps things to himself he will still kick off about not playing if he is pissed off enough. If Pearson can't handle this situation then we have much bigger problems than twitter to think about. Yeah I guess that's fair enough Marty. Personally I don't think I'd even take the risk.
Freeman's Wharfer Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 Just listened to Pearson's post-match interview: "I will try and be as fair as possible. But the only thing I'm really bothered about is the group buying into the fact that we're all here to get success together. There will be disappointments along the way for individuals but they're gonna have to deal with it" Is Tweeting about being on the bench buying into the fact that we're all here to get success together? Is Tweeting about it dealing with it? Tread carefully Nugent
Mark_w Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 I think the joke is the amount of characters used is the most questionable thing about the tweet You cut me deep man. You cut me real deep.
Guest Col city fan Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 Just listened to Pearson's post-match interview: "I will try and be as fair as possible. But the only thing I'm really bothered about is the group buying into the fact that we're all here to get success together. There will be disappointments along the way for individuals but they're gonna have to deal with it" Is Tweeting about being on the bench buying into the fact that we're all here to get success together? Is Tweeting about it dealing with it? Tread carefully Nugent Exactly what I'm saying FW Pearson has made it clear on more than one occassion already that this season is going to be a 'squad effort'.
Babylon Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 Just listened to Pearson's post-match interview: "I will try and be as fair as possible. But the only thing I'm really bothered about is the group buying into the fact that we're all here to get success together. There will be disappointments along the way for individuals but they're gonna have to deal with it" Is Tweeting about being on the bench buying into the fact that we're all here to get success together? Is Tweeting about it dealing with it? Tread carefully Nugent I think what he didn't say has more meaning.
Jace Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 You cut me deep man. You cut me real deep. Sorry mate was only another 1 of my bad jokes
Happy Fox Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 I think what he didn't say has more meaning. About Beckford in relation to work ethic?
marty78 Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 Just listened to Pearson's post-match interview: "I will try and be as fair as possible. But the only thing I'm really bothered about is the group buying into the fact that we're all here to get success together. There will be disappointments along the way for individuals but they're gonna have to deal with it" Is Tweeting about being on the bench buying into the fact that we're all here to get success together? Is Tweeting about it dealing with it? Tread carefully Nugent Maybe he uses humour as a defence mechanism because of his embarrassment at not starting.
Soar Fox Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 david nugent â€@nuge101235 Playing for Leicester City used to be much better when Sven was in charge and Mark_W wasn't on Foxestalk Expand Reply Retweet Favorite lol
5waller5 Posted 19 August 2012 Posted 19 August 2012 No but there is a I'm out my depth, I'll try and make out I'm above it all emoticon. It's this... If I'm ever out of my depth with you Babylon then I'll let you know. Until then you carry on banging the same drum - it's not boring at all.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.