theessexfox Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Beautiful ball over the top to Waghorn, a couple of times he perhaps picked the wrong pass but I saw potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingfox Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 In that case you're judging him ridiculously early. I liked him, and I liked Waghorn. So you should be pleased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morris1234 Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Was a great pass for waggy, once he's settled I'm sure he will show his qualities On another note mentioned above, knockaert can frustrate you, but you've got to understand he is going to be targeted now teams know what he can do. Also, an example today was when he went on a run and lost it , that's frustrating too, However we've not really had too many players of his type in the past so to create opportunities like he does you have to accept that for him to show his magic, he is going to lose the ball on mazy runs from time to time. He kept trying and like lingard didn't get in the game too much but when on the ball, neither did much wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muzzycomeback Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Just to prove my point the lad has scored a 25 yarded for derby! Only 17! And to the **** who called lingards performance pathetic - dont bother turning up again. RANT OVER His performance wasn't great today, but this reveals nothing of him as a player and it doesn't mean this blokes writing him off, I think we should get behind the lad next week and that there's is a difference between saying the lad's had a bad game and saying he is crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theessexfox Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Nobody is "judging" anybody. I didn't think he was very good today. In fact, I thought he was very poor. Nobody has written off the guy. looks like a small breeze could blow him over. can't really see what he's going to offer. Opinions? Seems a strange signing on that performance. Just not a nigel Pearson player at all! If futacs isn't good enough then why even put him on the bench. Why not recall hopper from his loan. Because Futacs simply had to come on I thought. I think that is judging, and I know the second one is taken a wee bit out of context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danno Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 The only creativity comes from Knockaert - not everything he tries will come off, but I can't think of another player in this league who would have had the vision, skill and touch to set that chance up for Nugent. Marshall has lost his way, he's not pathetic, Really? I could think of many and they wouldn't lose the ball all the time either. Marshall never had a 'way' just fired a few long shots to mask his inabilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGLCFC Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Really? I could think of many and they wouldn't lose the ball all the time either. Marshall never had a 'way' just fired a few long shots to mask his inabilities. Go on then, quote them. Knockaert will lose the ball from time to time, but if you think others at our club deserve to be starting before him, then in my opinion you are deluded. The guy is the most talented player to pull on a blue shirt in a decade and whilst he will not always be a world beater, he invariable produces that little bit of magic that can change games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fez of Mahrez Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Like playing with ten men today once he came on if we're honest, but I trust Nige and I'm sure he'll either come good or be quickly shelved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danno Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Go on then, quote them. Knockaert will lose the ball from time to time, but if you think others at our club deserve to be starting before him, then in my opinion you are deluded. The guy is the most talented player to pull on a blue shirt in a decade and whilst he will not always be a world beater, he invariable produces that little bit of magic that can change games. Whittington, Ince, Zaha, Pedersen, Park CY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGLCFC Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Don't agree with any of them - they are all players who play through balls well along the floor or over the top with pace, just like Gallagher, the ball Knockaert played was outrageous, scooped with perfect weight at the precise time Nugent began his run, whilst looking left towards the wing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peterborofox Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Cleaerly NP doesnt rate Futacs highly enough. Would have preffered him on over Lingard who couldnt get into the game but he needs time for us to judge him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitchandro Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Really? I could think of many and they wouldn't lose the ball all the time either. Marshall never had a 'way' just fired a few long shots to mask his inabilities. He fired a few long shots because he thought he could score with them, and he has been right quite a lot of the time. He's a great crosser/passer of the ball from open play, or at least he was at the start of the season. I lost count of the amount of guilt edged chances he created (many of which we spurned). Against Blackpool he practically ran the show. For whatever reason he's not been the player he looked a couple of months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adster Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 I actually thought he did quite well today to be honest for the time he was on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Ted Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Reminds me of Levi Porter for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marko Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 ****ING HELL HE'S MADE TWO ****ING SUB APPEARANCES!!! It's a new record for LCFC fans, questioning the guy's signing when he's played for a combined 35 minutes! I despair. To be fair, he's had 40 minutes more than most of Pearson's signing get, before half the folk on here declare they're not up to much and what was Pearson thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unabomber Posted 10 November 2012 Share Posted 10 November 2012 Leicester Logic: Not yet played a full half - better write this little **** off completely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gubbins Posted 11 November 2012 Share Posted 11 November 2012 He was completely anonymous in my opinion and bearing in mind his age and the position he plays Im still not sure what the point was in signing him. Also all you people saying we musnt judge him so soon and that he needs time to settle etc are aware we only have him for the grand total of one month. Hes probably now appeared in a third of all the games hes going to play for us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGLCFC Posted 11 November 2012 Share Posted 11 November 2012 He was completely anonymous in my opinion and bearing in mind his age and the position he plays Im still not sure what the point was in signing him. Also all you people saying we musnt judge him so soon and that he needs time to settle etc are aware we only have him for the grand total of one month. Hes probably now appeared in a third of all the games hes going to play for us! Think you'll find a month loan is so we can look at him and if he fits in it will be extended, like Davies and Cleverley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSpaM Posted 11 November 2012 Share Posted 11 November 2012 Genuinly looked like nobody wanted to pass to him yesterday, wasnt impressed at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky Posted 11 November 2012 Share Posted 11 November 2012 He was completely anonymous in my opinion and bearing in mind his age and the position he plays Im still not sure what the point was in signing him. Also all you people saying we musnt judge him so soon and that he needs time to settle etc are aware we only have him for the grand total of one month. Hes probably now appeared in a third of all the games hes going to play for us! So if he's not that effective we can send him back. Didn't do a lot yesterday but who knows, he might be great next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maybes Posted 11 November 2012 Share Posted 11 November 2012 Seriously, he has played 30minutes for us and some people are writing him off already. Get a grip! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrentFox Posted 12 November 2012 Share Posted 12 November 2012 Not writing him off. Not saying he needs time. Just commenting on what I saw against Forest, as it's all I have to go on. He looked lost and alarmingly out of his depth. He shouldn't. He is owned by one of the biggest clubs in the world and dropping to the Championship is a chance for him to shine. Thirty minutes isn't long, but in that time I saw little to suggest that slot wouldn't have been better utilised by giving it to one of our own players to stake a claim. When he goes back to Utd., Futacs will still be here. How demoralised and short of confidence do you suspect he might now be ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnegan Posted 12 November 2012 Share Posted 12 November 2012 Not only has he barely played, he was actually much.better than people are making out. He links up play very well, he doesn't dally on the ball and his passing and movement are quite sharp. He obviously wasn't a match winner but he was hardly garbage. Looks very lightweight though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danno Posted 12 November 2012 Share Posted 12 November 2012 My forest mates said they thought he looked good.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bayfox Posted 12 November 2012 Share Posted 12 November 2012 Have to say yes he was only on for a short time, but when we lost nugent who was playing well we needed to keep the pressure on Fword and he offered very little to be honest, not sure he really knew where he was playing, I can only assume he was meant to be in the hole just off waghorn, he looked very lightweight and seemed keen to get rid of the ball. This said I thought Marshall was poor when he came on as well, impact from the bench seems lacking at the minute, can't really understand why when we looked good with 2 up front we changed it, Fuctas I can only assume is gash in training. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.