Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Adster

Kevin Doyle.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why are people basing him only on his time at Wolves? Last season should be a write-off given how shit Wolves were anyway.

 

What about his time at Reading in the Championship and in the Premier League?! He's 29 and nowhere near past it, but trust FoxesTalk to pick the negative and ignore the positives!

 

He'd be a good signing and it's better that Waghorn goes because he's not getting a look in here. Even more so that he goes to a club in a different division!

Posted

Honestly think an in form waghorn is better. All he needs is confidence.

Why sign a player who doesn't have a proven goal scoring record and doesn't have time to improve on that?

how much longer can we wait for him to get his confidence back,only a fresh start at another club will do that i am afraid.

Posted

Would anyone have said no to signing Peter Beardsley because he didn't score many goals?

 

I think Doyle would create loads of chances for our other players, even if he didn't score the goals himself.

 

I would be chuffed with this.

Posted

Doyle isn't a regularly goal scorer there's no way he'd solve our problems. When on earth are we going in for Billy Sharp again?

 

We don't need creators we've already got them. 

Posted

In each of his two season here Nugent has scored more goals than anyone else at this level since Dickov's 18 in a promotion season with a team full of players who were with us in the Premiership.

Why anyone would want to sell him, I'll never know.

Anyway, Percy writes for The Mirror doesn't he?

Mirror reported a couple of weeks ago that Hull were making a £3m bid for Doyle (who cost Wolves £6.5m) if Doyle would half his current £40k/week

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/hull-transfer-news-kevin-doyle-2153251

Don't see how Doyle's potential fee plus wages fits in with what we're capable of doing being so close to FFP limits as it is

This stinks of Wolves going public because they're desperate to get rid of him & they're hoping it will entice bids.

Posted

Honestly think an in form waghorn is better. All he needs is confidence.

Why sign a player who doesn't have a proven goal scoring record and doesn't have time to improve on that?

 

Waghorn, a player who has scored no more than 12 (?) league goals at second tier level, isn't a better player than Kevin Doyle.

 

And how long will we be waiting for him to be 'in form' again? He's had a few chances under Nige and has only looked decent once if I recall correctly. It's time for him to move on imo, especially if we get another striker in. I'd take this deal.

Posted

His on big wages at Wolves. Unless hes willing to take a cut im not sure this will happen.

 

I think Waghorn is on big wages too, so probably not impossible.

Posted

He's not bad aerially so I'd take him. The only striker we have with any height is Wood and he doesn't even jump for headers half the time. Will suit us if we have to go direct; which seeing how we play when we set up 4-3-3 or 3-5-2 could be useful.

Guest shearfox
Posted

A think he is good, hasn't had a good time at Wolves, sometimes that happens he is only 29 and worth the risk because if he recaptures his form we have a natural goalscorer. I remember watching him and thinking I wish we had a player like that...

Posted

My impression of Doyle seems different to other people's.

 

He plays more in the gap between midfield and the forwards and is tricky and technically gifted.  He can pick out a pass and make chances for others to score.  He doesn't score many himself and this has led to criticism from Wolves fans who don't understand his game.  People have asked for a creative midfielder and I think Doyle might fit this role.  He is different from any other striker we have at the club.

 

Just my two-pennarth worth, but it is based on seeing him play for Wolves and the opinions of the more considered Wolves fans.

Guest shearfox
Posted

My impression of Doyle seems different to other people's.

He plays more in the gap between midfield and the forwards and is tricky and technically gifted. He can pick out a pass and make chances for others to score. He doesn't score many himself and this has led to criticism from Wolves fans who don't understand his game. People have asked for a creative midfielder and I think Doyle might fit this role. He is different from any other striker we have at the club.

Just my two-pennarth worth, but it is based on seeing him play for Wolves and the opinions of the more considered Wolves fans.

At reading he was a goalscorer, maybe wolves are using him a bit differently... and seems to be good at that, so will fit in here nicely as that is what we need.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...