cityfanlee23 Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Stop it, you don't understand where these figures come from, l could show you figures that state all sorts, but it wouldn't be relevant, people do not move around from city to city every year, size is pretty much constant. But there you are again trying to prove a theory by ignoring some of the facts. On that note, i'll give you the last word because theres are saying that goes - Don't argue with idiots" night night. BNET, You are following figures that are almost 4 years old. On that basis, My business made 5.25x less profit than it does now. Why don't you stop this silly little argument, go back into the corner under a blanket, get a torch out tonight, and have a look at the LATEST official population figures, and you will see, Quite clearly may I add, that Leicester. is no longer in 8th, and now in 13th, So not only, have you got your figures COMPLETELY WRONG, then argued about it for a while, before coming to the conclusion that you look very silly and deciding to 'Be the bigger man' as they say, You also stated a fact, that is completely irrelevant to Leicester city football club. Now please, for the sake of humanity, and intelligence, log off. Good god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StanSP Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Bloody hell never knew there were so many in Cov. Thanks to BNET unnecessarily in-breeding with them all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 It's actually laughable though, bringing Geography into a football debate. It's pathetic I know, But no way will I be told I am wrong by some moron who is looking at 2011 population figures, as if nobody is born or moves house, or emigrates over.. Also irrelevant that these people bring it up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox92 Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 It's pathetic I know, But no way will I be told I am wrong by some moron who is looking at 2011 population figures, as if nobody is born or moves house, or emigrates over.. Also irrelevant that these people bring it up! Yeah I understand where you are coming from.. But surely it works the other way as well? Manchester is the third biggest City in the Country, population wise there is about 512,000 people living here but Manchester United have been the best Premier League team ever... But does that count? Because Manchester actually only has one club and that's Manchester City... Manchester United don't technically play in Manchester. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Yeah I understand where you are coming from.. But surely it works the other way as well? Manchester is the third biggest City in the Country, population wise there is about 512,000 people living here but Manchester United have been the best Premier League team ever... But does that count? Because Manchester actually only has one club and that's Manchester City... Manchester United don't technically play in Manchester. Nail, on the proverbial head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col city fan Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 This threads become farcical again! Arguing over the size of the population? The forum's going downhill. Where's Babs and Thrac? Let's have some sense back please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitwickfox Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Can I throw my two penny in by just stating that the majority of city fans live way out in the county and other counties too ...can't believe I even said that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indierich06 Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 I claim Pearson is not a winner, thats all. He hasn't won anything in his career except division 3, once, he's won nothing else. You claim he is a winner, but he hasn't won anything bar div. 3. We are dealing with straight forward cold facts, but you still can't get it. Perhaps he's a winner in Scotland eh ! So if you take away the times that Pearson's won something, then he's actually won nothing. I get it now! Let's sack him immediately. We won't get anywhere with this loser in charge - who cares if we've had our best start for years? **** off Pearson! ...Right, what now? Shall I give Phil Brown a call? He got Hull promoted - he's a real winner. Or maybe Neil Warnock - he's had a few promotions. Utter dogshit with his last club of course - but hey, he's a real winner. Or we could try Iain Dowie? I've heard he's on the lookout for a club. What about Gary Megson? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 So if you take away the times that Pearson's won something, then he's actually won nothing. I get it now! Let's sack him immediately. We won't get anywhere with this loser in charge - who cares if we've had our best start for years? **** off Pearson! ...Right, what now? Shall I give Phil Brown a call? He got Hull promoted - he's a real winner. Or maybe Neil Warnock - he's had a few promotions. Utter dogshit with his last club of course - but hey, he's a real winner. Or we could try Iain Dowie? I've heard he's on the lookout for a club. What about Gary Megson? You have such a way with words indie bravo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan LCFC Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 This threads become farcical again! Arguing over the size of the population? The forum's going downhill. Where's Babs and Thrac? Let's have some sense back please. I thought the same here. I am truly gobsmacked that it's descended into such a huge debate over something where either result is largely the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BNET Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 It's pathetic I know, But no way will I be told I am wrong by some moron who is looking at 2011 population figures, as if nobody is born or moves house, or emigrates over.. Also irrelevant that these people bring it up! GEOGRAPHY !!!!! you pair of thick twats. You don't know what country Glasgow and Edinburgh are in, then 2 of you think population is a geography subject. Is it idiot week ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark_w Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Then 2 of you think population is a geography subject. Is it idiot week ? Ugh... it is...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BNET Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Ugh... it is...? Demography Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark_w Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Demography Or Population Geography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry - LCFC Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Demography Demography comes under the discipline of Geography. I'm doing Geography at university and population is one of my modules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stadt Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 DemographyAre you trying to be controversial this week? If so, well done you succeeded! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BNET Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Shakes head and gives up, as life is to short, just going check if black is actually white first ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sydney the Fox Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Generally, I think Pearson is doing a good job: 1. Beckford gone, Mills gone, Danns on loan etc 2. A good young squad which, I think will only get better. 3. Confidence is back in the side. 4. Third in the league. And more..... As I've said, Pearson will become a City hero if he can finally stop these losses away from home to very average sides. Sort that and we'll have a real shout of top two. Good post Col - especially this bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan LCFC Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 **** this. Pearson has got to go, for this debate alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 Where's Babs and Thrac? Let's have some sense back please. The horse has bolted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deep blue Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 **** this. Pearson has got to go, for this debate alone. Aren't we allowed to blame it on Wellens now he's gone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Babylon Posted 16 October 2013 Share Posted 16 October 2013 You pair of thick twats. I see abuse it still tolerated on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan LCFC Posted 17 October 2013 Share Posted 17 October 2013 Aren't we allowed to blame it on Wellens now he's gone? HE GOT RID OF WELLENS TOO?! AAAAAAARGH. PEARSON OUT, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ealingfox Posted 17 October 2013 Share Posted 17 October 2013 GEOGRAPHY !!!!! you pair of thick twats. You don't know what country Glasgow and Edinburgh are in, then 2 of you think population is a geography subject. Is it idiot week ? Irony Overload. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry - LCFC Posted 17 October 2013 Share Posted 17 October 2013 GEOGRAPHY !!!!! you pair of thick twats. You don't know what country Glasgow and Edinburgh are in, then 2 of you think population is a geography subject. Is it idiot week ? Seriously why do you have to behave like this? It's just unpleasant. It's not unfair for us to expect you to act like a decent human being on this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.