Guest ttfn Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 And what would the score be?. v Dyer would ruin Savage at right back.
foxfanazer Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 Wasn't Sinclair a RB and Sav a CM? Would be an interesting game thats for sure. One advantage for todays crop is footballers are generally more athletic. I'd go 2-2 Muzzy and Collymore Knockaert and Vardy
Soar Fox Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 Vardy & Nugent would get kicked all gane by Elliott & Taggart. A young Heskey would tear Moore & Morgan a new one. I'd say the old guard would win 3-1.
Collymore Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 I’d go 3-3 Collymore hattrick and Sinclair hattrick of OGs. Flowers saves last minute Nugent Penalty.
_Fatboyslow_ Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 I’d go 3-3 Collymore hattrick and Sinclair hattrick of OGs. Flowers saves last minute Nugent Penalty. sounds good to me
Lobsterboyuk Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 That's an interesting one but can't see past a comfortable win for the old guard. But ask the question in a year or two and if the NP team remains largely intact I think it would be a much closer game!
jonthefox Posted 31 December 2013 Author Posted 31 December 2013 Incidentally, the O'neill team is the one that beat sunderland 5-2, and the pearson team is the one that played on sunday.
Collymore Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 Also a fight between Was and his Andelecht crew v Walsh and Taggs which leaves £257k of damage and 13 in hospital.
Sampson Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 Vardy & Nugent would get kicked all gane by Elliott & Taggart. A young Heskey would tear Moore & Morgan a new one. I'd say the old guard would win 3-1. Heskey would never tear Morgan and Moore a new one. For such a big build, Heskey was one of the weakest and most lightweight players I ever saw. A player like Morgan was exactly the type of player he was rather useless against.
MPH Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 Heskey would never tear Morgan and Moore a new one. For such a big build, Heskey was one of the weakest and most lightweight players I ever saw. A player like Morgan was exactly the type of player he was rather useless against. That's absolute nonsense. You are confusing going to ground easily as weak. One is a tactic he wasn't very good at the other was a lack of strength. Remember heskey getting into a scuffle on the pitch once were he pushed someone away. Was funny seeing them fall down and their rear skidding along the grass....
Paulmot Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 Eadie would be out injured. Drinky would shoot and the ball bounce over a kneeling Flowers. Izzet would score with an overhead from outside the box. Heskey would miss 3 headers and Savage run round like a headless chicken. Taggart and Elliot seem to have swapped places. Sinclair to score two OG/s and Collymore a hatrick. That makes it 4-3 to the Proven Prem side.
KFS Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 Think the current side would lose the midfield battle.
Fox92 Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 Forget Dyer, Heskey's pace would cause problems all day.
Stocker Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 The gulf in class is massive, most of the old guard were decent internationals, the midfield was maybe the best we have ha possibly ever and collymore was one of the best players to grace the premiership.
Stadt Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 A Leicester side from the 60's would probably beat both.
foxer Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 The old squad would hammer the current one in my opinion, no contest.
LCFC FOX Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 I think our current squad would win because lets face it that old squad are all fat and old now...
Devonfox1884 Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 3-2 current team. The old guard were better, but savage at right-back?! Lloyd would have a field day!
ScouseFox Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 MON's team by a good 4 or 5. So much better.
jmono84 Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 I think the players of today, even 10 years on, are technically better, faster, fitter etc so I can see the new team winning... I think any player from the 60's or around that time would struggle nowadays because football has improved so so much recently
pazzerfox Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 What about if the team of yesteryear played 3-5-2 with Walsh, Elliot and Taggart at the back, Eadie/Guppy wingbacks and Sav, Lennon, Izzet centre mids?
Guest MattP Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 The old guard win that one comfortably. That side put in one of the best performances I've ever seen from a city side and they were just below the top 4 at the time in the pl. 3-0 old guard.
Sampson Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 Forget Dyer, Heskey's pace would cause problems all day. Heskey was certainly nowhere near as quick as Dyer. Dyer is one of the quickest players I have ever seen, for any side. Joachim and Lineker were quick as well, but I think Dyer may be even quicker.
Captain... Posted 31 December 2013 Posted 31 December 2013 The desire and drive from the old guard would disrupt the new lots pretty passing, they would have no time on the ball and be driven backwards, Dyer and Vardy's pace would cause problems but they wouldn't get the service, NP would bring on GTF and revert to long ball, MON would bring on Kaamark to sit on Knocky if he is causing too many problems. Old guard would destroy Moore and Morgan in the air and score a couple from corners and set pieces, Collymore and Heskey were so good in that Sunderland game they would easily create chances with Muzzy pulling the strings, while Lennon just sits in front of the back four, NP's team to score first, after Dyer does Savage up like a kipper, Eliott header from a corner, Collymore 2 (one header one screamer) Heskey with a late burst through to slot past Kasper. 4-1
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.