BigWesMorgan Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Didn't have to think to much about this. THESE ARE SERIOUS RATINGS. Schmeichel 2 - Didn't have to make a save, Didn't save any of the goals Moore 2 - Nothing Wasilewski 2 - Everything except the goal line clearance was awful Morgan 1 - Absolutely shocking. Poor marking. Should have scored twice. Don't know what's wrong with him Konchesky 3 - Not great Drinkwater 3 - Ok King 4 - Some good freekicks in there, Couldn't do much more Mahrez 2 - Nothing Knockaert 2 - Nothing Nugent 1 - Nothing Phillips 1 - Nothing Wood 3 - Hit post, Didn't touch the ball after Dyer 3 - Assist GTF 8 - Monster. No coincidence that we've scored in last 2 games he's come on
DennisNedry Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 None of the players really showed any effort or desire to win tonight, so 3s all round for me.
weller54 Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 -1 the lot of them!!!!!.... Refund everyone's hard earned money!!.. Debacle!!!
sulfoxide Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Fans deserve more, they don't earn thousands a week
shailen Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Players looked hungover. Would be concerned if we hadn't already achieved promotion
XLM Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 We weren't good at all. Thank Christ we have a bit of extra time to get ourselves sorted before the reading game. Could do with Vardy back
cuddly ken Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Didn't have to think to much about this. THESE ARE SERIOUS RATINGS. Schmeichel 2 - Didn't have to make a save, Didn't save any of the goals Moore 2 - Nothing Wasilewski 2 - Everything except the goal line clearance was awful Morgan 1 - Absolutely shocking. Poor marking. Should have scored twice. Don't know what's wrong with him Konchesky 3 - Not great Drinkwater 3 - Ok King 4 - Some good freekicks in there, Couldn't do much more Mahrez 2 - Nothing Knockaert 2 - Nothing Nugent 1 - Nothing Phillips 1 - Nothing Wood 3 - Hit post, Didn't touch the ball after Dyer 3 - Assist GTF 8 - Monster. No coincidence that we've scored in last 2 games he's come on After The Lord Mayors Parade, but maybe a glimpse of what to expect next season?
iamafox Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 We better not see these ratings every game in the Premier league next season
Dickov22 Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Kasper 5 Thought he should have come for their second. Needs to dominate his box more Moore 6 Not really his fault, he's not a full back Wasilewski 5 Absolute horror in the first half that nearly cost us a goal. Bit of a liability Morgan 5 Got to be doing better in the air for us from set peices Konchesky 6.5 Best of the back 4 for me Knockaert 4 Awful Drinkwater 6 Nowhere near his best. Missed James King 6.5 Not bad Mahrez 6 Good early on but really faded second half Nugent 4 Kept forgetting he was on the pitch Phillips 3 It's time to retire Wood 7.5 Really put himself about. Did well Dyer 7 Caused them problems and did well defensively on a few occasions too GTF 7 I like him. Cannot for the life of me understand how Phillips is so often prefeerred to him We need to improve defending set pieces We really miss Vardy and the havoc he causes defenders
SomalianFox15 Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Kasper 1 Moore 1 Wasyl 1 Morgan 1 knocky 1 King 2 Drinky 1 Mahrez 2 Nuge 1 Phillips 1 Wood 2 GTF 10 Dyer 8
Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 GTF - 8.5. Got to start next game if Vardy's still unavailable, he was head and shoulders above the rest of our squad. Dyer - 7. Not his best but offered us some attacking options. Few smart moves. Wood - 6. Hustled and bustled enough, if he'd have had any service he might have scored. Everyone else - still pissed from the weekend. Technically weren't playing so N/A Being serious, Mahrez had a few ok moments but everyone else was pure garbage, it was really baffling. It was like they'd never met each other.
Bert Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Kasper 4 - Should've come for the second and fourth. Then moans at everyone else. Moore 4 - Not a right back. Konch 4 - Get Schlupp back in ASAP. Morgan 5 - Bullied by Ulloa. Wasyl 4 - See Morgan but was a bit more of a disaster. Knocky 5 - Nothing happened for him. Mahrez 6 - The one player that looked like he could make things happen. Drinky 5 - Not at the races. King 6 - Steady. Nuge 5 - Misses Vardy. Phillips 3 - Offered nothing. Wood 6 - Did well, served a purpose being on the pitch. Dyer 5 - An assist but nothing else. GTF 7 - Class. Actually played well.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 They all get a 3, big attendance lots of money spent by the fans and they deliver that horse shite... Next time I hope Pearson doesn't allow the players to let loss when we have a game around the corner. Wait for the end of the season, we still need to secure the title...
stevelcfc Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Starting Phillips is the only real bad decision NP has made this year
themotivator Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Konchesky 6.5 Best of the back 4 for me I totally believe everyone should have the right to express their opinion and you are right to criticise the back four, but how you can give konchesky a score higher than anyone else on the pitch is beyond me. I feel bad for the guy because i know once upon a time we were served well by him, but he was completely exposed tonight. Can't understand what some people saw in his performance tonight. If anyone can be bothered to enlighten me then feel free. his performances in general seem to point towards the fact that he is coming to the end of his career at this level.
Monsell1976 Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Nobody should get above a 5 in my eyes, 5 out of 10 is an average performance, and for a team that never got going, there was a lot of below average performances.
Alf Bentley Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Schmeichel 5 Dealing with crosses (2nd goal) is a major weakness Moore 3 Dreadfully exposed/slow to react; may have a great future as a centre back, but not as a full back Wes 4.5 Really slack Wasyl 4.5 Tried hard, but seriously erratic Konch 6 Best of a bad defence, but not great; Come in, Jeff! Mahrez 6 Some silky moves, but didn't really impose himself Drinky 5 Pretty mediocre passing/covering King 6.5 Not wonderful, but one of the few who was adequately professional Knocky 6 Applied himself properly, at least; unlucky to be subbed, but maybe needed a rest Nuge 6 Worked hard to link play but never quite worked Kev 2...out of sympathy; zero impact; bench cameos, coaching or hang up the boots please, Kev Dyer 6 Did improve a dire (pun intended) team effort, frequently beating his man, but rarely delivering a chance (did once!) Wood 5 Hustled, but -1 for passing when 1-on-1 with keeper, spurning a clear chance GTF 7 MoM (!) Professional attitude & some sublime touches; should start v. Reading if Vardy's out NP (season) 9.99 Close to perfection - anyone with a brain is very grateful indeed NP (tonight) 4 Why start Phillips? Why play Moore out of position when he's not played for ages? Why not change the midfield formation when we were being comprehensively outplayed there (definite case for Hammond at H/T)? Why not practice defending (and attacking) set pieces more in training....clearly needed? Ref 7.5 Seemed pretty good when I think of it (apart from not dealing with time-wasting) Brighton 8??....but hard to assess; played good passing, possession football, but to what extent our abysmal effort made them look better than they are, I really couldn't tell.....a little worrying that we'll meet a lot more such passing football in PL 80% of fans in Kop: 8 Some genuine defiance and passion; excellent stuff! 20% of fans in Kop: 0 Slinking off early at the first sign of bad times?! Fvck off and don't come back! Policing (whoever ordered it - club or police?): 0 You created needless confrontation/ill feeling, you tossers! L1: ?? Understand the frustration, but DK what was going on there; from the Kop, it looked a bit of a fiasco...
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 8 April 2014 Posted 8 April 2014 Nobody played well today perhaps except the 3 subs who came on
Dickov22 Posted 9 April 2014 Posted 9 April 2014 I totally believe everyone should have the right to express their opinion and you are right to criticise the back four, but how you can give konchesky a score higher than anyone else on the pitch is beyond me. I feel bad for the guy because i know once upon a time we were served well by him, but he was completely exposed tonight. Can't understand what some people saw in his performance tonight. If anyone can be bothered to enlighten me then feel free. his performances in general seem to point towards the fact that he is coming to the end of his career at this level. 6.5 is hardly a great mark. He did his job and tried to get forward better than Moore did. I don't think he's good enough now for the prem but he was ok last night. I think he gets picked on a bit.
Ricey Posted 9 April 2014 Posted 9 April 2014 Kasper - 4 - More examples of him not coming off his line. It's one of the reasons we concede so many from set-pieces. Moore - 3 - Not a RB, but even considering that he was very poor last night. Head was down. Wasyl - 3 - Could have been sent off, again. Looked slow, clumbsy, often caught out position and along with Morgan should never have let Ulloa stroll through as he did. Morgan - 5 - One of our better players, but still seemed to be a second or so behind play. Konchesky - 4 - Started well but that soon turned into a nightmare. Knockaert - 3 - Awful, couldn't even make a simple pass and sulked rather than trying to win the ball back. King - 4 - Good on the ball but last night proved to me he won't be good enough next season. He didn't track his runners all game and didn't close down quick enough. Drinkwater - 5 - Struggled, looked tired. Mahrez - 6 - Thought he did ok, surprised he was taken off. Phillips - N/A - Refuse to judge him on last night. Silly to start him upfront with Nugent, nothing he could do. Nugent - 4 - Tired, why won't NP ever rest him? SUBS: Wood - 6 - Did well at holding the ball up and hit the post. Dyer - 5 - Typical Dyer, pace and threat but lacking end product. GTF - 7 - Scored and chased more than Nugent did the whole game.
Dickov22 Posted 9 April 2014 Posted 9 April 2014 Kasper - 4 - More examples of him not coming off his line. It's one of the reasons we concede so many from set-pieces. Moore - 3 - Not a RB, but even considering that he was very poor last night. Head was down. Wasyl - 3 - Could have been sent off, again. Looked slow, clumbsy, often caught out position and along with Morgan should never have let Ulloa stroll through as he did. Morgan - 5 - One of our better players, but still seemed to be a second or so behind play. Konchesky - 4 - Started well but that soon turned into a nightmare. Knockaert - 3 - Awful, couldn't even make a simple pass and sulked rather than trying to win the ball back. King - 4 - Good on the ball but last night proved to me he won't be good enough next season. He didn't track his runners all game and didn't close down quick enough. Drinkwater - 5 - Struggled, looked tired. Mahrez - 6 - Thought he did ok, surprised he was taken off. Phillips - N/A - Refuse to judge him on last night. Silly to start him upfront with Nugent, nothing he could do. Nugent - 4 - Tired, why won't NP ever rest him? SUBS: Wood - 6 - Did well at holding the ball up and hit the post. Dyer - 5 - Typical Dyer, pace and threat but lacking end product. GTF - 7 - Scored and chased more than Nugent did the whole game. Dyer 'lacked end product' ?? Apart from his run and cross that put the ball on a plate for GTF to score from
Ricey Posted 9 April 2014 Posted 9 April 2014 Dyer 'lacked end product' ?? Apart from his run and cross that put the ball on a plate for GTF to score from Yes, but that cross should have been cleared easily. What about the time he pulled it back to Drinkwater on his weaker foot rather than drilling into a danger area? Or the cross that went over everybody? One decent cross doesn't equal 'end product'.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.