ScouseFox Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 this is the most i've enjoyed any commentary of any game or highlights package probably ever "could be mutch" ......................... ............. ............ "ohhhhhhhhhhh" .......................... "could've also been puncheon !" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Eatfood Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 this is the most i've enjoyed any commentary of any game or highlights package probably ever "could be mutch" ......................... ............. ............ "ohhhhhhhhhhh" .......................... "could've also been puncheon !" and "where did that ball go!" It hit the post John. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brooksy Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Shearer just disagrees for the sake of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 "Oh my word, it could be? YESSS, NO! It didn't go in! Or did it? Was it Puncheon? OSPINA! Outside the box? RONNIE RADFORD!! Palace have scored, OHHHH, Was it Murray? GOAL!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facecloth Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Errr, no, but when a player follows through in that manner, with that force, he is endangering an opponent. It was unbelieveably cowardly if you ask me. And clearly David Busst's leg break was very bad, but Denis Irwin didnt excessively go in on him. Well I'd say there was more force in Irwin's challenge than Barnes' seeing as Matic's leg is still in one piece and Busst's leg was smashed so bad that the bone came through the skin. So to say Irwin didn't use excessive force is a ridiculous statement. And also how the hell do you follow through with force? It's just a natural movement of his leg. Where's he's meant to put his leg when swings through the ball and Matic puts his leg in its path? Levitate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 How's that not a clear goal scoring opportunity for graham when lescott pulls him back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facecloth Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 How's that not a clear goal scoring opportunity for graham when lescott pulls him back? Because it was Danny Graham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Because it was Danny Graham Still an opportunity, just because it will obviously spurned doesn't make it not a chance, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facecloth Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Still an opportunity, just because it will obviously spurned doesn't make it not a chance, I know, I wasn't being serious suggesting he should stay on because the strikers shit. Otherwise nobody would ever be sent off for doing that against Villa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Eatfood Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 How's that not a clear goal scoring opportunity for graham when lescott pulls him back? If he gives the free kick he has to go but giving a foul was harsh in the first instance I thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaspa Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Whats Pulis been doing to old women in the street? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Eatfood Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Whats Pulis been doing to old women in the street? Probably organising them into a solid back four. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsr-burnley Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 By your logic any time another player kicks the ball whilst in close proximity to another they will be endangering them then. Exactly - you've got it. Barnes kicked the ball in the vicinity of Matic, who arrived too late to make the tackle but just in time to put his leg right where Barnes' foot was landing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donut Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Well I'd say there was more force in Irwin's challenge than Barnes' seeing as Matic's leg is still in one piece and Busst's leg was smashed so bad that the bone came through the skin. So to say Irwin didn't use excessive force is a ridiculous statement. And also how the hell do you follow through with force? It's just a natural movement of his leg. Where's he's meant to put his leg when swings through the ball and Matic puts his leg in its path? Levitate? Genuine question. Is this all foxestalk, playing devils advocate, spark debate stuff? Ive made my point, but i just cant believe people who are defending Barnes. Why not just smash someone as hard as possible on your follow through every time then? If anything Barnes should have followed through even harder then if he was just passing the ball and made sure he never got up then. Finish the job. Hospitalise him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Eatfood Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Genuine question. Is this all foxestalk, playing devils advocate, spark debate stuff? Ive made my point, but i just cant believe people who are defending Barnes. Why not just smash someone as hard as possible on your follow through every time then? If anything Barnes should have followed through even harder then if he was just passing the ball and made sure he never got up then. Finish the job. Hospitalise him. Did you also think think that Wasyl should've been sent off earlier in the season for the "elbow" on Berahino? Genuine question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donut Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Did you also think think that Wasyl should've been sent off earlier in the season for the "elbow" on Berahino? Genuine question. Im undecided. It falls into the "ive seen them given" category. Ive watched it that many times i cant decide. It looks like he put his elbow up but they were jockeying too, just too tough to tell. At the time, I was saying definite red, but then seeing it more and more, i couldnt decide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Doctor Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Genuine question. Is this all foxestalk, playing devils advocate, spark debate stuff? Ive made my point, but i just cant believe people who are defending Barnes. Why not just smash someone as hard as possible on your follow through every time then? If anything Barnes should have followed through even harder then if he was just passing the ball and made sure he never got up then. Finish the job. Hospitalise him. He didn't go in hard though, he passed the ball and Matic stepped into the way, there's very little Barnes could have done to prevent that - if Matic had been injured it would have been a horrifically unfortunate accident, like Bussts leg-break; not the result of a malicious foul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan LCFC Posted 21 February 2015 Share Posted 21 February 2015 Again, learn how to use apostrophe's you oxygen thief. I wish I did run the FA. Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo hope the bbc keep up their sherwood's face documentary at the exact moment they concede an injury time pen i really do I hope the **** actually succeeds next time he tries to eat himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Eatfood Posted 22 February 2015 Share Posted 22 February 2015 Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Oh bollocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facecloth Posted 22 February 2015 Share Posted 22 February 2015 Genuine question. Is this all foxestalk, playing devils advocate, spark debate stuff? Ive made my point, but i just cant believe people who are defending Barnes. Why not just smash someone as hard as possible on your follow through every time then? If anything Barnes should have followed through even harder then if he was just passing the ball and made sure he never got up then. Finish the job. Hospitalise him. No I'm not playing Devils advocate, I honestly believe he was right not to be sent off.It doesn't matter how hard he catches him, because it's a completely accidentally collision. You're likening it to a tackle like when Martin Taylor went over the ball and crunched Eduardo's leg into two. It's totally different. He doesn't tackle Matic, Matic tackles him and puts his leg is his way as this photo proves, he's just passing the ball and its Matic coming in Accidental collisions happen all the time on a football pitch, some cause serious injury, but it doesn't make them all red cards, same as sometimes players fall over its not always a dive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarshallForEngland Posted 22 February 2015 Share Posted 22 February 2015 Why? Because I'm sick of seeing the game reduced to a non-contact sport. Beacuse I don't want to see people sent off for nothing? What's embarrassing is your lack of reasoning whilst resorting to name calling. Learn how to spell and use apostrophe's. Spectacular fail or subtle irony? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowlattsFox Posted 22 February 2015 Share Posted 22 February 2015 One player nearly breaks a players leg, accidental or not, and the other pushes someone in the chest causing no harm. Which one gets sent off? Football is pathetic sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
st albans fox Posted 22 February 2015 Share Posted 22 February 2015 Can't help feeling that aguero will get a rest against us - bony and djeko begin games against us with a goal by their names! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox92 Posted 22 February 2015 Share Posted 22 February 2015 Can't help feeling that aguero will get a rest against us - bony and djeko begin games against us with a goal by their names! We won't concede. Got a perfect 0-1 away victory all over it that game... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benpicko Posted 22 February 2015 Share Posted 22 February 2015 Again, learn how to use apostrophe's you oxygen thief. I wish I did run the FA. Explain why you used one there then?Edit: Two people have already pointed it out apparently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.