sylofox Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 So who thinks the shaving foam is a good idea and would you like to see it in the prem? personally think it is one of the best changes in the game for years. Players can't argue the ball is marked no rolling forward. Then the line is drawn for the wall. Mods sorry if this is elsewhere plse move if it is.
Beliall Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 Yep. Will make it it the prem no doubt, sponsored by gillet.
lgfualol Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 Yes, absolutely. I don't even know how one could argue against it.
goose2010 Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 It should be yes. But I'm sure I read that it isn't going to be in the prem this year. Will be in the champs league but not in the prem
Unabomber Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 Yeah for sure, just tried it with me dog and even he wouldn't walk past it.
sylofox Posted 5 July 2014 Author Posted 5 July 2014 Not always sure with rule changes but this one is so simple and brilliant. Why have we had to wait till a world cup this should have been bought in world wide after one game. Will stop time wasting and gamesmanship and no complaints for a booking.
sylofox Posted 5 July 2014 Author Posted 5 July 2014 Yeah for sure, just tried it with me dog and even he wouldn't walk past it. Will try it with our cats but sadly think it will fail
MooseBreath Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 I heard the prem wanted it a while back but the fa blocked it on safety grounds over fears it might cause slippages
sylofox Posted 5 July 2014 Author Posted 5 July 2014 It will only improve the game so yes. Can your Gif do it without the bra to improve this place
sylofox Posted 5 July 2014 Author Posted 5 July 2014 I heard the prem wanted it a while back but the fa blocked it on safety grounds over fears it might cause slippages Think thats been proven wrong.
Buzzell Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 Can your Gif do it without the bra to improve this place Probably could but doubt the mods would approve of it.
jammie82uk Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 Wow have we found something that everyone on here can agree on
Gary Eatfood Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/27908119 Apparently the whole world seeing it used effectively at the World Cup is not good enough for the Premier League or the FA. Vanishing spray will not be introduced into the Premier League next season despite it being considered a success at the 2014 Fifa World Cup in Brazil. The new initiative marks out where a free-kick should be taken from and where the defensive wall must stand, aiming to prevent players cheating.It will be used in the Champions League from next season. But the Premier League and Football Association will monitor how effective that is before introducing it. The FA remains open-minded about possible future use should it prove to be an overwhelming success. But Premier League officials do not think encroachment or ball moving at set pieces is a significant problem in the competition. The spray, which has been used in recent seasons in the Brazilian and Argentine leagues, evaporates about a minute after being administered from a canister by the match official. The Football League has yet to comment on the vanishing spray.
Deucalion Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 My older dogs looked puzzled and my puppy ate some of it. So not sure.
LAprice_ Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 There was a commentator who joked about there being an orange version for when playing in snowy conditions. At least I think it was a joke...
foxfanazer Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 Yes, without a doubt. Massive success in this WC imo
Brooksy Posted 5 July 2014 Posted 5 July 2014 Yeah for sure, just tried it with me dog and even he wouldn't walk past it.
shade Posted 6 July 2014 Posted 6 July 2014 meh, I'm not against it but it makes free kicks a big ordeal now, striding around spraying the floor, I can't remember the last time I saw encroachment.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.