DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 deport him back to Wycombe What! He's that Ian Stringer! Well, stuff my old boots with stones! I don't want him back down here. Send him somewhere else, ffs.
yorkie1999 Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 And the first thing Stringer will come out with tonight. "I understand there's been a lot being said about nigel and i on social media and i hope people understand it's nothing personal. I'm doing my job, a job i get paid to do, and nigel is as understanding of my job as i am".
Dan Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 And the first thing Stringer will come out with tonight. "I understand there's been a lot being said about nigel and i on social media and i hope people understand it's nothing personal. I'm doing my job, a job i get paid to do, and nigel is as understanding of my job as i am". can hear it now and it hasn't even started.
Matt Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 I missed the start, was anything said? I've switched off again since, bore fest.
The Doctor Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 Christ, I remember why I don't listen to this or the football forum most of time. Says it all about Stringer that he puts his name before the station ID
RowZ Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 polls are ridiculous ? most ridiculous comment I have seen on this thread and a complete giveaway...to your lack of argument hang on maybe you are right ...... next general election we should decide by the most deranged forum posts, judges could be lunatics picked randomly from extremist groups far better way than counting votes from a significant and representative group of individuals ... what as I thinking You conveniently missed out the word 'forum' (...forum polls are ridiculous) Unlike the polling companies who monitor election results, I doubt there's anything scientific or even reliable about clicking once, twice or maybe a thousand times on a yes/no button on a post driven by pro-Pearsonites. Must be the same people who start Facebook polls - not all City fans will vote on Facebook or Foxestalk but they have an opinion either way.
ARTY_FOX Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 You conveniently missed out the word 'forum' (...forum polls are ridiculous) Unlike the polling companies who monitor election results, I doubt there's anything scientific or even reliable about clicking once, twice or maybe a thousand times on a yes/no button on a post driven by pro-Pearsonites. Must be the same people who start Facebook polls - not all City fans will vote on Facebook or Foxestalk but they have an opinion either way. But on those 2 sites you'll have a larger number vote than people that phone in to bbc radio leicester so if you can't use actual numbers to determine what side the 'larger' number is behind how do you suppose we do it?
veezeeblue Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 You conveniently missed out the word 'forum' (...forum polls are ridiculous) Unlike the polling companies who monitor election results, I doubt there's anything scientific or even reliable about clicking once, twice or maybe a thousand times on a yes/no button on a post driven by pro-Pearsonites. Must be the same people who start Facebook polls - not all City fans will vote on Facebook or Foxestalk but they have an opinion either way. you cant vote twice on FT polls btw you cant get away from the obvious truth which is the majority of fans support NP at this point which makes sense as there is so much of the season left if you and the other pearson haters were in force there would have been deafening booing after the match finished from what I heard then and seen posted recently you must be in a 10% minority - if that !
KentyLCFC Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 so stringer stirring up sh** to get pearson sacked but then your stirring up sh** to get stringer sacked. so your all of you are as bad as him? maybe? so then Im gonna stir up sh** about all of you to get you all sacked! but then im as bad as you which means im as bad as stringer aswell! holy sh** im as bad as stringer maybe I should be sacked? can someone make up sh** to stir about me so that stirred sh** gets me sacked! but then theoretically that person is as bad as stringer too, possibly? SACK HIM TOO! but what if we break the cycle about being as bad as stringer by getting stringer himself to stir sh** about the guy that stirred sh** about the guy who stirred sh** about me! *mind blown* p.s. Pearson please beat villa so stringer has no reason to stir sh**
Dan Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 Justified as Pearson is actually decent at his job and Stringer's never been anything but a self-obsessed worm.
Guest Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 Stringer has never been very good at his job. so stringer stirring up sh** to get pearson sacked but then your stirring up sh** to get stringer sacked. so your all of you are as bad as him? maybe? so then Im gonna stir up sh** about all of you to get you all sacked! but then im as bad as you which means im as bad as stringer aswell! holy sh** im as bad as stringer maybe I should be sacked? can someone make up sh** to stir about me so that stirred sh** gets me sacked! but then theoretically that person is as bad as stringer too, possibly? SACK HIM TOO! but what if we break the cycle about being as bad as stringer by getting stringer himself to stir sh** about the guy that stirred sh** about the guy who stirred sh** about me! *mind blown* p.s. Pearson please beat villa so stringer has no reason to stir sh** you're
Mark_w Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 you're It's probably worth teaching him how to use capital letters first.
muzzy1981 Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 Stringer in as a commentator Stringer out as a pundit, leave it to someone who knows the game is. MATTY ELLIOT!
KentyLCFC Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 It's probably worth teaching him how to use capital letters first. you're 1. Stop being grammar Nazi. 2. I find you chose of words appalling due to the fact you have told FIF to help me with my grammar or to be more specific "capital letters" but you have failed to realise that FIF himself has forgot to put a capital letter in front of "you're" proving that the whole process of what would be FIF teaching me about capital letters highly irrelevant. 3. Get owned scrub.
MC Prussian Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 I found it somewhat interesting how "tame" and almost friendly and understanding Stringer sounded on the boot room alongside the Birch tonight. It's as if he's now restraining himself or he's being restrained by the BBC following the episode on Tuesday. Anyway, onwards and upwards. I would agree that the whole scenario actually made fans back the manager more and stand together, united.
inckley fox Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 you're That's the single best response I've ever seen on here. I wouldn't have known where to begin either.
SystonFox Posted 4 December 2014 Posted 4 December 2014 STRINGHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA OOOOOOOUUUUUTTTTTTTT NOW NOW NOW
Leicester_Numan Posted 5 December 2014 Posted 5 December 2014 I'm referring to his F.O.A.D. comments - better ask the club if they're negative? Certainly doesn't seem a positive thing to say as they're investigating. Angry fans do swear and curse - usually at the ref or away fans...but who can honestly say they've never cursed a LCFC manager at the top of their voice over the years when they disagree with what he's doing? McLintock? Pleat? Taylor? Take your pick. I can honestly say I've shouted abuse at opposition managers, players and fans, referees, linesmen and even some of our own fans behaving like complete tools but never at Leicester managers or players. I may disagree with their selections, tactics, substitutions, financial dealings, results etc, I may moan and criticise occasionally but I don't boo and I don't abuse them and if I ever did, I'd expect it right back
The Railway Man Posted 5 December 2014 Posted 5 December 2014 Any fan who abuses their own manager to this extent is clearly a complete cretin, let alone one who has won us two championships in recent history. #banthefan Anyone know if Is he a regular? He deserves a visit from a few supporters at the next home game.
MattGamble92 Posted 5 December 2014 Posted 5 December 2014 He's downplayed it but he clearly has kept a grudge against Pearson since last time and cannot wait for him to be sacked. His ego gets in the way of his professionalism and he isn't anywhere near as good as he thinks he is.
teblin Posted 5 December 2014 Posted 5 December 2014 He's downplayed it but he clearly has kept a grudge against Pearson since last time and cannot wait for him to be sacked. His ego gets in the way of his professionalism and he isn't anywhere near as good as he thinks he is. He got banned didn't he for releasing team information before a game?
Manwell Pablo Posted 5 December 2014 Posted 5 December 2014 1. Stop being grammar Nazi. 2. I find you chose of words appalling due to the fact you have told FIF to help me with my grammar or to be more specific "capital letters" but you have failed to realise that FIF himself has forgot to put a capital letter in front of "you're" proving that the whole process of what would be FIF teaching me about capital letters highly irrelevant. 3. Get owned scrub. Stop being a* Choice of*
Babylon Posted 5 December 2014 Posted 5 December 2014 He got banned didn't he for releasing team information before a game? I think he got banned one time for slagging Pearson off for sitting on the bench and not jumping about etc... when in fact he had a bad back and was in pain, hence being sat still on the bench.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.