Oadby Fox Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Fantastic come back, http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30966042
Oadby Fox Posted 24 January 2015 Author Posted 24 January 2015 Its not on the red button yet??? Just the goals really...
Brainy Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Oh wow that was a really faint flick from Schlupp at the end wasn't it And minimal contact for Kramaric.. wasn't aware there had to be more than minimal contact for a foul to count as a foul
AKCJ Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Standard of refereeing really is pathetic. I'd even risk saying that if it wasn't our record signing European striker that went down but our Ex-Non League one instead then he'd have given it. Reputations really do seem to account for a lot and you don't even have to earn one nowadays.
DennisNedry Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Standard of refereeing really is pathetic. I'd even risk saying that if it wasn't our record signing European striker that went down but our Ex-Non League one instead then he'd have given it. Reputations really do seem to account for a lot and you don't even have to earn one nowadays. Take your head out of your arse for a minute and actually look at it objectively. Kramaric dived. Brilliant movement to make himself available for the pass though, and on another day may have managed to con the ref, because it certainly looked a foul in real time.
Guest kristianity77 Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 He dived initially then was clipped by the keeper mid dive. Sorry but it's never a pen and he got what he deserved for that.
AKCJ Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Take your head out of your arse for a minute and actually look at it objectively. Kramaric dived. Brilliant movement to make himself available for the pass though, and on another day may have managed to con the ref, because it certainly looked a foul in real time. Having looked at it objectively in the first place, Kramaric's left foot is clearly swiped by Vorm's. It's a penalty, even more of one than theirs and theirs was a stonewaller too. It's a foul. Clear as day.
Zapp Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Just viewed the Kramaric decision Not a lot of contact, but clearly vorm was in the way enough to obstruct Kramaric getting to the ball to finish. The ref gave the spurs pen where Moore was "in the way" but barely obstructing soldados chance to get the ball. Because the ref gave the spurs pen its pure inconsistency for him not to award leicester a penalty. If he gave none then id say fair enough. But they are similar instances with similar outcomes. But opposite decisions.
RowlattsFox Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 He's gone down easy but I think it's a pen. Doesn't have to be contact for it to be a penalty sometimes. Bit of luck with the goals but who cares. Schlupp should have scored his first chance, he's linited but something always happens with him.
Fox92 Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 And RE Kramaric penalty. I'd be disappointed if that was given against us.
kingfox Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Lovely play from Simpson for the winner. Can blame Moore all you like for giving away the penalty, but what in the world was Drinkwater doing to give it away in the first place, completely bullied.
Spiritwalker Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 And RE Kramaric penalty. I'd be disappointed if that was given against us. I'd bet my life savings that it would have been given against us, and our keeper would have been off.
DennisNedry Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Having looked at it objectively in the first place, Kramaric's left foot is clearly swiped by Vorm's. It's a penalty, even more of one than theirs and theirs was a stonewaller too. It's a foul. Clear as day. Kramaric is already going over by the time contact is made. I'd be fuming if it was given against us.
GingerrrFox Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 There's **** all between the penalty given against Moore and the booking for Kramaric. There is essentially the same amount of contact in both. The ref didn't give us it because we were against a big side at home. That's a penalty every day of the week for a team like United at Old Trafford but not for little Leicester at White Hart Lane.
Spiritwalker Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 There's **** all between the penalty given against Moore and the booking for Kramaric. There is essentially the same amount of contact in both. The ref didn't give us it because we were against a big side at home. That's a penalty every day of the week for a team like United at Old Trafford but not for little Leicester at White Hart LaneThis. A fair ref would either give both or neither. I can't believe our fans are backing the ref on this.
st albans fox Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 I'd bet my life savings that it would have been given against us, and our keeper would have been off. sure would
surrifox Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 big call to book him IMO. Still he looks alert and looks to get into good positions (based upon a very limited bit of highlight time) . Moore should have just let Soldado carry on and shoot; that useless t**t would never have scored
davieG Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Nigel Pearson: TV technology needed Related Content FA Cup news FA Cup fixtures FA Cup reports Leicester manager Nigel Pearson called for video technology to help prevent the sort of injustice which could have resulted in his side being knocked out of the FA Cup instead of going on to produce a thrilling stoppage-time 2-1 victory over Tottenham at White Hart Lane. The Foxes had been trailing to a penalty from Andros Townsend, but felt they should have been given a spot-kick themselves just ahead of half-time. Spurs goalkeeper Michel Vorm - who had earlier made two good saves - looked to have tripped Andrej Kramaric. However, referee Robert Madley instead showed the Foxes' record £9million signing a yellow card for diving rather than a red to the Dutchman and signalling a penalty. The visitors, though, were eventually rewarded for their continued industry with seven minutes left when Leonardo Ulloa swept the ball into the bottom corner. There was then late drama in stoppage time when Vorm allowed a scuffed shot from Jeff Schlupp to squirm over the line. Pearson was pleased his side got their rewards, but also felt the match could have hinged on such a key decision. "I am big believer in the need to introduce more technology to aid the officials," said the Leicester manager. "There is no point ranting and raving about it. I can say it was unfortunate today, however these things can cost people their jobs. "If it was a Premier League game which we lose because of a decision like that, maybe I would be talking a bit differently. "The media have monitors to see the incidents, and I think in the Premier League there should be no issue in having another official who has the capability to see replays - once the referee has blown the whistle, it would not take too long to refer it. "For the supporters as well, it would clarify situations in the game and there would not be ill feeling in the ground. "I don't see why we don't look to utilise it more." Pearson had made several changes to his starting XI and felt the team deserved credit for their efforts, which came on the back of struggles for consistency in the Barclays Premier League. "It was a really good win for us, because we need to find a way to win more games," he said. "I know they made a lot of changes, but hopefully this will be a positive influence for the rest of the season." Pearson insisted there should be no issue over the selection of utility man Schlupp, who was ruled out of travelling to the African Nations Cup with Ghana because of a knee injury picked up on New Year's Day at Liverpool. "We operated well within our rights. The regulations are there to protect players, clubs and national sides," he said. "We have been totally transparent about the situation throughout. "He did not take part in their training camp and on medical grounds was advised not to fly. That is our own medical team and an independent medical assessment which the Ghana federation had done and they came to exactly the same conclusion. "I know it has got legs because he has scored the winner today, there will probably be more about it, but I am not concerned by any negativity. "I am delighted he is with us and has shown what a talent he is." Spurs manager Mauricio Pochettino had retained just two players who started the midweek Capital One Cup semi-final win over Sheffield United, but offered no excuses for the defeat. He said: "This (rotation) is our way since the beginning of our season, and I do not think this is a reason to justify the result. "During the game we played well, but you need to kill the game. "We created chances, but also gave Leicester the chance to be alive. "We are out of the FA Cup, and for that I am very disappointed."
chapero82 Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 There's **** all between the penalty given against Moore and the booking for Kramaric. There is essentially the same amount of contact in both. The ref didn't give us it because we were against a big side at home. That's a penalty every day of the week for a team like United at Old Trafford but not for little Leicester at White Hart LaneThis. A fair ref would either give both or neither. I can't believe our fans are backing the ref on this. The ref more than likely thought it was easier to book Kram for diving then giving a pen and sending off the home sides goal keeper which is a disgrace tbf
johnny the fox Posted 24 January 2015 Posted 24 January 2015 Just viewed the Kramaric decision Not a lot of contact, but clearly vorm was in the way enough to obstruct Kramaric getting to the ball to finish. The ref gave the spurs pen where Moore was "in the way" but barely obstructing soldados chance to get the ball. Because the ref gave the spurs pen its pure inconsistency for him not to award leicester a penalty. If he gave none then id say fair enough. But they are similar instances with similar outcomes. But opposite decisions. definite pen end of..
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.