foxy boxing Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 ranieri's reaction to kante " i want to kill him"
Julian Joachim Jr Shabadoo Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 5 minutes ago, ScubaBlue said: Hazard will get a huge reception from me though, if his name is called out! This, what a magic moment that was
Grewks Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 2 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said: Is there actually any evidence for that or is this one of your famous fabrications. One of my fabrications? There were dozens of rumors, which led to the heavy PSG links. Can you not remember?
Manwell Pablo Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 Just now, Grewks said: One of my fabrications? There were dozens of rumors, which led to the heavy PSG links. Can you not remember? rumours, so there is no evidence at all then basically, no direct quote, no nothing. Where as this, was proven in court. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-11166370 There in lies your difference.
Ted Maul Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 Not going to this game, but if I was, I wouldn't boo. I certainly wouldn't clap him either. My frustrations around the move lie with football in general, rather than the individual. It wasn't just that we'd lost a great player- this was one of the best players at the champions of England, ready for his bow in the Champions League, jumping ship to a club at a low ebb for a few extra quid. It symbolised everything wrong with modern football for me- the short-termism, the lack of loyalty, the lack of meaning to a contract, the agent-influenced/engineered deals being done before a fee has been agreed (whatever happened to the 'tapping up' laws?). I mean, taking a wider view- if the champions can't keep their best players, what chance have mid-table/relegation threatened clubs (which will be us again one day) got of keeping theirs?
richardsfoxes Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 Wouldn't boo him but have no ties to him now, just another player at another club sad really.
Grewks Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 Just now, Manwell Pablo said: rumours, so there is no evidence at all then basically, no direct quote, no nothing. Where as this, was proven in court. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-11166370 There in lies your difference. So Leicester fans booed mattock because of an offence in a nightclub no-one cared about? I seriously hope you boo Danny Simpson every time he touches the ball and his name is read out.
sylofox Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 1 hour ago, TiffToff88 said: The man won us the Premier League, he owes us absolutely nothing. He'll get a standing ovation from me at the start of the game and that's that. Once the game kicks off, he's part of the opposition and will be treated as such for as long as he's on the pitch. And if he gets subbed off, it will be to more applause from me. He won us nothing he was part of a team that won the league. But he deserves respect for his part. Once we kick off he is an opposition player. Will hazard get a cheer for his part. To me if you cheer Hazard you can't disrespect Kante. I remember the time us and Chelsea were great rivals for the wrong reasons. Tomorrow should be a time to forget that. Both players should get a cheer then we kick off game on.
Manwell Pablo Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 Just now, Grewks said: So Leicester fans booed mattock because of an offence in a nightclub no-one cared about? I seriously hope you boo Danny Simpson every time he touches the ball and his name is read out. An offence in a nightclub no one cared about? behave yourself. I've already said, I'm booing everyone bar King, Danny Simpson included, all of this "transferring clubs" has got well out of hand and it's about time someone put a stop to it.
stripeyfox Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 31 minutes ago, GaelicFox said: Manwell your someone I respect but if you don't think a little booing is in order then you need to take up fishing the day the passion and feeling is taken out of football it's the day football dies he was greedy and disloyal , so he deserves a boo and at the end I hope he comes and claps the fans at least in west stand and then he should get a round of applause as a thank you and then the matter is over ! He he has looked rather average last 3 games for them so maybe we saw the pinacle of his career last year ! So if I leave my job for a payrise after working my socks off for them for a year, that makes me greedy and disloyal?
Jaspa Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 N'Golo's missing out on Champions League footy this year for the sake of more money for him and his agent. He hadn't settled here perfectly either but it was obviously a working relationship, he could've stayed here one more year for little loss. But then the transfer clause comes into it, any Champions League side could've had him for around £20m, if he held out for Chelsea he could've earned us another £12m here. IMO its just football and business, move on with no feelings hurt
Grewks Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 Just now, Manwell Pablo said: An offence in a nightclub no one cared about? behave yourself. I've already said, I'm booing everyone bar King, Danny Simpson included, all of this "transferring clubs" has got well out of hand and it's about time someone put a stop to it. You arguing with me for the sake of it is just pure comedy gold. We were right to shout 'let him die' to Mattock whilst laying on the ground with a broken leg because of an incident in a nightclub? We have a right back who was found guilty of 'throttling an ex-girlfriend', but that's alright because he plays for us? You're just a hypocrite. If I was in Mattock's shoes on that night, getting 'grief' from nobodies about making choices, which actually, at the time, made far more sense than Kante's move, i'd have responded in the same way.
TiffToff88 Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 9 minutes ago, sylofox said: He won us nothing he was part of a team that won the league. But he deserves respect for his part. Once we kick off he is an opposition player. Will hazard get a cheer for his part. To me if you cheer Hazard you can't disrespect Kante. I remember the time us and Chelsea were great rivals for the wrong reasons. Tomorrow should be a time to forget that. Both players should get a cheer then we kick off game on. You're taking what i said too literally. obviously i'm aware he didn't single handedly win us the league. But as you said, he was part of the team and that will always go down in history. Every single member of last season's squad deserves our gratitude and respect, regardless of the circumstances in which they leave the club (Unless anyone goes all Dennis Wise on us and beats the crap out of another player in their sleep). I don't think anyone got angry with Liam Moore for leaving, did they? and he's supposed to be Leicester through and through. Kante never wanted to come here in the first place, but did a fantastic job nevertheless. Inler also got a winners medal but left, is he being tarred with the same brush as Kante? Cambiasso left after one season to move to a club who were at the time seen as a step up from Leicester (As chelsea also are, despite not qualifying for europe), but would no doubt be welcomed back with open arms as an oposition player should the opportunity ever arise. Players come and go every season. Its part of football. Loyalty is rare in football these days, but it doesn't mean we should respect Kante any less than the likes of Inler, Moore and Cambiasso.
Clever Fox Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 I admire Kante for his contribution to our league win last season. But he left us for what he perceived to be a bigger club Chelsea, maybe they are, but bigger is not always better. You have to cut him some slack considering his start in life. Looking at him in his recent games for Chelsea he doesn't look happy, Which leads me to believe he may regret his decision already. But then again he never bought into the tightness of our squad. The one who really deserves clapping and a big reception is Hazzard. He could have gone through the motions against Spurs but instead put in a Match winning performance. For that he'll always have a special place with me, apart from the fact he's a very good player.
Guest Foxin_mad Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 He is a greedy twat, deserves everything gets the little rat. Unfortunately too many do-gooding arse-wipes go to the football these days so he will probably get a clap! He walked out in the middle of a project, to a rival for more money, that is it he is a greedy twat nothing else! He was a small cog in an excellent team, hopefully we can go on and finish above his team of money grabbing has-beens. Players like Vardy, Drinkwater and Marhez have signed new contracts and are a completely different class of true legend to this little halfwit.
Manwell Pablo Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 7 minutes ago, Grewks said: You arguing with me for the sake of it is just pure comedy gold. We were right to shout 'let him die' to Mattock whilst laying on the ground with a broken leg because of an incident in a nightclub? We have a right back who was found guilty of 'throttling an ex-girlfriend', but that's alright because he plays for us? You're just a hypocrite. If I was in Mattock's shoes on that night, getting 'grief' from nobodies about making choices, which actually, at the time, made far more sense than Kante's move, i'd have responded in the same way. I'm really not and I haven't even said either of those things I'm trying to illustrate the simple difference between smacking around 4 Leicester fans in a nightclub and not smacking around 4 Leicester fans in a nightclub and why that may impact on the way someone is greeted when they return to Leicester City football club but as usual you are tieing yourself in knots firing off the first irrelevant point that comes into your head and driving the conversation off topic. And, well, wow.
sylofox Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 He may have viewed the club differently had CR not made it obvious mendy was his first choice. It seems he wants to be loved hence his Chelsea move and not to man u.
GaelicFox Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 15 minutes ago, stripeyfox said: So if I leave my job for a payrise after working my socks off for them for a year, that makes me greedy and disloyal? If I helped pay your wages and helped give you a platform I can assure you I'd slap you down if you jumped ship at first opportunity and left me in lurch .... In fact I had this happen to me and the sniffling muppet was back a year later looking his job back , actually to make it worse he sent his missus to ask me , I was warm and welcoming , she left and she didn't ask again ...
Countryfox Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 9 minutes ago, Clever Fox said: But he left us for what he perceived to be a bigger club I honestly don't think thats the case at all and would love to know exactly why he went .... there's a lot lot more to this. Whether its family or his agents someone behind the scenes is pulling all the strings. But go he did and if he gets booed then that extra £30k a week or whatever it is will probably ease the pain the poor little chap will have to go through. My heart bleeds.
Grewks Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 Just now, Manwell Pablo said: I'm really not and I haven't even said either of those things I'm trying to illustrate the simple difference between smacking around 4 Leicester fans in a nightclub and not smacking around 4 Leicester fans in a nightclub and why that may impact on the way someone is greeted when they return to Leicester City football club but as usual you are tieing yourself in knots. And, well, wow. There you go again, pure hypocrisy. How is it acceptable for you to claim that those who give Kante a negative reception are, and i quote, 'Brainless'. Yet, clearly advocating that cheering and applauding Danny Simpson every time his name is read as acceptable. How are you justifying booing Mattock but not Simpson? - Because he currently wears a City shirt? - His victim wasn't a Leicester fan? - There was only 1 victim not 4? I personally find it insulting being told what I should do, and how I should react to things. My reaction to Kante will be based on exactly that, my reaction.
MrSpaM Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 12 minutes ago, Grewks said: You're just a hypocrite. If I was in Mattock's shoes on that night, getting 'grief' from nobodies about making choices, which actually, at the time, made far more sense than Kante's move, i'd have responded in the same way. Theres a bit of a difference between Kante leaving for another club, and Mattock calling us shit in the media before he'd even left, punching two women in a nightclub and then claiming we'd treated him awfully as fans when he got his 'big move' to the mighty west brom, who got relegated that season.
Grewks Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 2 minutes ago, MrSpaM said: Theres a bit of a difference between Kante leaving for another club, and Mattock calling us shit in the media before he'd even left, punching two women in a nightclub and then claiming we'd treated him awfully as fans when he got his 'big move' to the mighty west brom, who got relegated that season. Huh? I was comparing his reaction to Mattock, with his reaction to Simpson. Both scum of the earth, but one is treated better because he plays for us.
Manwell Pablo Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 1 minute ago, Grewks said: There you go again, pure hypocrisy. How is it acceptable for you to claim that those who give Kante a negative reception are, and i quote, 'Brainless'. Yet, clearly advocating that cheering and applauding Danny Simpson every time his name is read as acceptable. How are you justifying booing Mattock but not Simpson? - Because he currently wears a City shirt? - His victim wasn't a Leicester fan? - There was only 1 victim not 4? I personally find it insulting being told what I should do, and how I should react to things. My reaction to Kante will be based on exactly that, my reaction. Yeah it would be Grewkes, I will say again, if I had actually at any juncture said that for the third time I HAVE NOT SAID THAT, ANYWHERE. If your that keen to find out why don't you setup a topic about Danny Simpson and Joe Mattock and see what reaction you get off the good people on here if you are that desperate to find out. But you wont do that, as you know as well as I do that the whole point is ridiculous and you'll get ridiculed. I am not telling you what to do, all I've done is given an opinion, not an instruction. You really need to grow up mate
Clever Fox Posted 19 September 2016 Posted 19 September 2016 12 minutes ago, sylofox said: He may have viewed the club differently had CR not made it obvious mendy was his first choice. It seems he wants to be loved hence his Chelsea move and not to man u. A good point. That may well have a bearing on him wanting to leave. But I bet there were other factors like his wife wanting to be in London, Having lived in Paris. I don't know if Mendy can deliver but we sure missed a ready replacement in Gueye.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.