theessexfox Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 Looks a bit better, that's one way to get Mahrez and Gray in the team and keep a bit of balance, nice to see Chilwell rewarded too.
filbertstreet Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 nice to see chilly and gray getting rewarded, come on lads!
The Doctor Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 Schmeichel; Simpson, Morgan, Huth, Chilwell; Drinkwater, Amartey; Albrighton, Mahrez, Grey; Slimani. So, 4-2-3-1 as suggested or 4-4-2 with grey up top?
the fox Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 Slimani''s header today gonna be more targeted then ousama Ben laden
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 Come on City its lift off day. Leicester win
The Doctor Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 Interesting they've written it as a 4-2-3-1 - could easily be 4-4-2 with grey up top like he plays for England.
HighPeakFox Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 So I suspect CR has finally concluded the players have had their chance at 442, and has reasonably made the necessary change.
FireFox Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 Surprised Chilwell keeps his place, but not necessarily unhappy about that. I hope Albrighton is allowed to play on the right wing for most of the game. Let Gray take the left, Mahrez in the middle, obviously switch it up quite a bit too.
Marshall Cockney Fox Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 Don't think that's a new formation, just different players. Utterly reliant on the Algerians being interested today. Bloody hope they are!!
Barky Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 Standard two banks of 4 with slimani up top and Mahrez in a free role I expect. I like it.
Finnegan Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 Just now, HighPeakFox said: So I suspect CR has finally concluded the players have had their chance at 442, and has reasonably made the necessary change. It could and probably still will be the same formation just with Gray up front?
Webbo Posted 31 December 2016 Posted 31 December 2016 I hope all these people calling for change won't complain if it doesn't work.
shiv Posted 31 December 2016 Author Posted 31 December 2016 Just now, Finnegan said: It could and probably still will be the same formation just with Gray up front? Potentially, but looks slightly more like a 4-2-3-1.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.