Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, grobyfox1990 said:

'clearly are going to' is optimistic. They were terrible at Fulham. Only a few defeats away from being right in it

 

They'll get the points they need at home I reckon.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think carrying a knife should be an immediate 10 year prison sentence. Knife crime continues to rise and it needs tackling with a major deterrent. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Sly said:

I think carrying a knife should be an immediate 10 year prison sentence. Knife crime continues to rise and it needs tackling with a major deterrent. 

Wouldn't say that's unpopular...

 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Voll Blau said:

Wouldn't say that's unpopular...

 

 

 

Well. Turns out I’m a lily-liveried liberal.

 

Some of these are hard to categorise - ie there’s a difference between someone who’s nicked a bike and someone who won’t stop nicking bikes despite several arrests/warnings, etc. But even so.

Posted
1 hour ago, SemperEadem said:

Gives us two exciting games in pretty mundane league now. You look for these fixtures as soon as they are out. 

Plus the songs and the history, pretty crap singing wings of an eagle against Brentford at home for example when you could be belting it out against those twats themselves.
 

Also from a UFS point of view its been enjoyable having a dingdong some what with FG. Your rival having a ‘group’ has been excellent. I wan’t more of the same on that.

I want 100% less of that. The whole local rivalry stuff leaves me absolutely cold. Two worst games of the season by a mile.

  • Haha 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Dunge said:

I want 100% less of that. The whole local rivalry stuff leaves me absolutely cold. Two worst games of the season by a mile.

You're honestly saying you'd rather watch us play Fulham at home than Forest?

Posted
1 hour ago, kingkisnorbo said:

You're honestly saying you'd rather watch us play Fulham at home than Forest?

100%, without irony, yes.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Dunge said:

100%, without irony, yes.

Seconded.

 

The rivalry is nice for a day, but seeing them floundering in League 1 for years was prolonged joy.  Send them down.

Edited by Zear0
  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, Voll Blau said:

Wouldn't say that's unpopular...

 

 

 

What does this even mean? Are there countries where the public is pro crime? Like I get it. It's from a right wing publication and they want to feed us the idea that:

 

a) Sending people to prison and for longer is a magical fix.

b) People who think sending people to prison is the way to tackle crime are tougher on crime than those who are not.

c) We ought to determine our policy by direct public consultation. 

  • Like 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, LiberalFox said:

What does this even mean? Are there countries where the public is pro crime? Like I get it. It's from a right wing publication and they want to feed us the idea that:

 

a) Sending people to prison and for longer is a magical fix.

b) People who think sending people to prison is the way to tackle crime are tougher on crime than those who are not.

c) We ought to determine our policy by direct public consultation. 

I’m concerned about the 1% of people that want to send someone to jail for 15 years for not wearing a seatbelt. Then on the flip side, the 18% that don’t want anything under 5 years for rape of a child. 
 

This is why the public can’t be trusted. 

  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, Daggers said:

I firmly believe that 1-10% of the population should be banned from voting or holding opinions about anything.

 

image.png.4f1d9c0e1926cf2fa48f6701142c8c8d.png

Surprised death by dangerous driving isn't on there! That's got one of the worst sentences going... it's effectively manslaughter and should carry 12 years minimum for me.

Posted

 

4 hours ago, Sly said:

I’m concerned about the 1% of people that want to send someone to jail for 15 years for not wearing a seatbelt. Then on the flip side, the 18% that don’t want anything under 5 years for rape of a child. 
 

This is why the public can’t be trusted. 

Was just about to post this, actually laughed out loud when I saw the 1% at either end of the spectrum. 

 

Surely they are either taking the piss or didnt understand the question.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Nalis said:

 

Was just about to post this, actually laughed out loud when I saw the 1% at either end of the spectrum. 

 

Surely they are either taking the piss or didnt understand the question.

You’d like to think so, however we’ve all seen how dodgy some of the voting has been in the last 10 years! 

Posted
5 hours ago, Silebyfox_89 said:

Surprised death by dangerous driving isn't on there! That's got one of the worst sentences going... it's effectively manslaughter and should carry 12 years minimum for me.

I can’t work out if you’re appealing your lenient sentence or volunteering to serve other people’s. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 13/02/2023 at 10:23, Foxdiamond said:

The Germans needed to defeat the RAF and failed. There is a major doubt they could have protected their invasion barges from RN. 

There is NO WAY the Germans would have got across the channel while the RN was asleep...

And even if they did, they would have to fight my Wife's Great Grandad, who was at Portland Bill armed with a wooden mockup rifle.

Posted
1 minute ago, filthyfox said:

There is NO WAY the Germans would have got across the channel while the RN was asleep...

And even if they did, they would have to fight my Wife's Great Grandad, who was at Portland Bill armed with a wooden mockup rifle.

My Uncle managed to get back from Dunkirk with the 1/7 Queens Royal West Surrey Regiment. My Dad was manning a Bofors Gun with the RA at Folkestone. Thank Christ Operation Sealion did not happen.

Posted

I find it bizarre that people who oppose young folks being able to access help and/or treatment for gender dysphoria tend to be those types who vote for a party that has trashed young people's education and plunged a huge number of them into poverty. It's almost like their real issue isn't about caring for children.

  • Like 1
Posted

Harry Kane isn't a football legend, only at Tottenham.

 

The 'football legend' status might change if he, somehow, achieves a trophy triumph.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Wymsey said:

Harry Kane isn't a football legend, only at Tottenham.

 

The 'football legend' status might change if he, somehow, achieves a trophy triumph.

He will retire as the premier leagues all time top goalscorer. Trophy’s or not that’s some achievement.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...