Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, MC Prussian said:

So, Iborra claims to have been held back, but the replay comes in late and we don't see the confrontation at all?

How is the VAR in the position to judge any better?

 

"I can't tell, it's not on the screen. Pffft... No foul."

Presumably they aren't seeing what we are.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Benny's shot...

lol

 

Posted (edited)

VAR is only as good as the referee viewing it...

 

The concept is brilliant and much needed. The only thing that will cause it to fail are the people who make the judgements. 

Edited by TheUltimateWinner
Posted
1 minute ago, AKCJ said:

lol What the **** is the point in VAR if they're not going to give penalties for a defender having both hands on the hips of an attacker?

 

Such an obvious foul.

This is why VAR is pointless.

 

Because even after its used no one will accept the verdict.

 

If a pen had been given on the field that would stand as a penalty. The cricket analogy is a good one

Posted
Just now, Babylon said:

Presumably they aren't seeing what we are.

They aren't seeing a clear bear hug to stop a chance then?

 

Finally can legitimately ask what game they're watching then.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

What a pass from Mahrez!

:o

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...