Brendan Rodgers

[Edingleyfox]

Suspect this is old news find it hard to believe that we would make a change at this time although you can never be sure 

Edited 10 June 2018 by Edingleyfox

[worthosoriginals]

46 minutes ago, Clever Fox said:

Rubbish story, But I wouldn't want him anywhere near our Club. Even Lennon won lots of trophies at Celtic and look how he turned out down here.

good comparison.

Lennon won easily in crap jock football land against rubbish zero opposition.

comes to England faces better teams weekly at Bolton, 4 wins in 37, they get relegated. (some city fans wanted him here cos he did well at celtic).

goes back to jockland does better again. 

 

[STUHILL]

2 hours ago, lcfcsnow said:

Because he had no chance of getting it so it looked good for him at Celtic to say that. Puel gone by end of June as I said elsewhere.

Looking forward to your New Manager Thread in couple of weeks then 

[VLC86]

17 minutes ago, worthosoriginals said:

Yeh they sacked him cos he was fantastic there.

jog on.

How many managers in world football don’t get sacked? The guy was a slip away from winning them the league.

[Callabinho]

Bollocks and as many have said, surely they would have done it already... if this does happen then it’s shameful, and quite embarrassing...

[SemperEadem]

Already seeing the Leicester Loyal lot getting their knickers in a twist over this.

[Vacamion]

 

It’s not about his ability.

 

It’s that he appears to be an absolutely dreadful human being.

 

 

[NotTheMarketLeader]

10 minutes ago, Callabinho said:

Bollocks and as many have said, surely they would have done it already... if this does happen then it’s shameful, and quite embarrassing...

Shameful? 

 

Whether we think Rogers is better than Puel, Guardiola is better than Rogers is the key issue. Surely we want the best manager we can possibly get for our team.

 

Not sure why sacking one manager and employing another  one thought to be better, is ‘shameful’,given the exiting one gets handsomely financially compensated.

[NotTheMarketLeader]

1 minute ago, Vacamion said:

 

It’s not about his ability.

 

It’s that he appears to be an absolutely dreadful human being.

 

 

Please explain. 

[Sol thewall Bamba]

What a load of shite

[Vacamion]

16 minutes ago, NotTheMarketLeader said:

Please explain. 

 

Google “Being Liverpool” “documentary”.  

 

The envelope scene, like a lot of the rest of it, was utterly cringeworthy and showed a lack of emotional intelligence and empathy that makes you wonder how his mind works. 

 

The fact that the “Deluded Brendan” account on Twitter got so much traction tells you a lot.

 

And then there’s his classic midlife cliche from a few years ago.  He lost some weight, got his gnashers fixed up and left his missus and kids to shack up with a younger blonde married employee of Liverpool who also had a kid, whose deserted husband later killed himself.

 

So yeah, in the likeability stakes, he ain’t uncle Claudio Ranieri.  

 

[st albans fox]

43 minutes ago, NotTheMarketLeader said:

Shameful? 

 

Whether we think Rogers is better than Puel, Guardiola is better than Rogers is the key issue. Surely we want the best manager we can possibly get for our team.

 

Not sure why sacking one manager and employing another  one thought to be better, is ‘shameful’,given the exiting one gets handsomely financially compensated.

Absolutely right - we try to employ the best person we can .... whether that’s on the pitch or off it (DOF excepted ?)

 

you dont sack the incumbent manager until you know you can get the better one in. 

 

And this doesn’t mean I would approve of Rogers being appointed ..... that’s a different debate 

Edited 10 June 2018 by st albans fox

[Clever Fox]

10 minutes ago, Vacamion said:

 

Google “Being Liverpool” “documentary”.  

 

The envelope scene, like a lot of the rest of it, was utterly cringeworthy and showed a lack of emotional intelligence and empathy that makes you wonder how his mind works. 

 

The fact that the “Deluded Brendan” account on Twitter got so much traction tells you a lot.

 

And then there’s his classic midlife cliche from a few years ago.  He lost some weight, got his gnashers fixed up and left his missus and kids to shack up with a younger blonde married employee of Liverpool who also had a kid, whose deserted husband later killed himself.

 

So yeah, in the likeability stakes, he ain’t uncle Claudio Ranieri.  

 

This says it all and is exactly the reason I wouldn't want him near our Club regardless of his ability to Manage.

 

We have a Top Coach in Puel who is a gentleman with wider experience than Rogers, all we need to do is back him and see what happens.

Edited 10 June 2018 by Clever Fox
I wanted to add more

[Vacamion]

Just now, Clever Fox said:

This says it all and is exactly the reason I wouldn't want him near our Club regardless of his ability to Manage.

 

I didn’t even mention him defending Luis Suarez cheating week in week out.

[Foxes1]

3 hours ago, HighPeakFox said:

If Puel does go this summer, what does it tell us about our recruitment process?

That the manager has no say in who we bring in it is all down to Rudders and his minions

[Clever Fox]

2 hours ago, Costock_Fox said:

Lol that’s such a shit comparison, are you aware that Rodgers has managed clubs other than Celtic?

Yes I've followed Rogers since he was a youth Coach at Chelsea, And he wasn't liked there either. Mourhino got rid of him.

[Kitchandro]

7 minutes ago, Clever Fox said:

This says it all and is exactly the reason I wouldn't want him near our Club regardless of his ability to Manage.

 

We have a Top Coach in Puel who is a gentleman with wider experience than Rogers, all we need to do is back him and see what happens.

 

Well we don't have a top coach, that's just silly. The other stuff is fair enough but there is no way you can argue that Puel is a top coach based on what we've seen so far.

[VLC86]

4 minutes ago, Clever Fox said:

Yes I've followed Rogers since he was a youth Coach at Chelsea, And he wasn't liked there either. Mourhino got rid of him.

Followed him that well that you can’t even spell his name  

[ithuriel]

1 minute ago, Costock_Fox said:

Followed him that well that you can’t even spell his name  

I think he was following the wrong Rogers

[Clever Fox]

1 minute ago, Costock_Fox said:

Followed him that well that you can’t even spell his name  

all right smart Ass, 

[weller54]

6 hours ago, knitro said:

if you believe this I have a bridge to sell you..

Interested.. 

How much do you want for it? 

[Clever Fox]

2 minutes ago, Costock_Fox said:

Followed him that well that you can’t even spell his name  

 

5 minutes ago, Kitchandro said:

Well we don't have a top coach, that's just silly. The other stuff is fair enough but there is no way you can argue that Puel is a top coach based on what we've seen so far.

Yes he is a Top Coach his record with young players prove that. Just give him time you haven't seen anything yet. He's had to thread carefully trying not to upset certain players. If given the time he will definitely take us forward.

[Realist Guy In The Room]

Have we ever signed an international class full back then sacked the manager shortly after?

 

Rings a bell for some reason.

[Guest Sharpe's Fox]

20 minutes ago, Clever Fox said:

We have a Top Coach in Puel

[davieG]

11 minutes ago, Realist Guy In The Room said:

Have we ever signed an international class full back then sacked the manager shortly after?

 

Rings a bell for some reason.

Fuchs