ARM1968 Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 (edited) I need to wash mine, they’re a tad sweaty. Edited 24 July 2018 by ARM1968
Heymister2015 Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Players linked are seriously crap! Hope we have bigger ideas
La-li-lu-le-lo Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Ings is a decent player, always rated him a Burnley. He’s rotting at Liverpool, I’d happily see him here. 2 1
FirePower Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 11 minutes ago, Heymister2015 said: Players linked are seriously crap! Hope we have bigger ideas Ings is not crap!!! I get it he is not a world class player. But we are not a world class team so don't expect world class players. The highest calibre we could be fortunate to get would be the likes of thorgan hazard. Townsend :-/
MC Prussian Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Why was the other thread from yesterday deleted? No point in doing so.
egg_fried_rice Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Good player and would suit us, but doubt he'd want to play second fiddle to Vardy as I understand he wants to play regularly. Could see him at Palace or Saints, or maybe even back at Burnley although they probably wouldn't put up the pound notes required.
cambridgefox Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 15 minutes ago, Heymister2015 said: Players linked are seriously crap! Hope we have bigger ideas Did you mean to post this on” we all live in a blue and white kop” FB
Devonfox1884 Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 I’d take him if the price was right, but then again do we really need another striker? Vardy and Nacho should be fine.
Scotch Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Just now, Devonfox1884 said: I’d take him if the price was right, but then again do we really need another striker? Vardy and Nacho should be fine. I have a sneaky suspicion that we may play with 442 diamond next year which would require two up top..... Everything seems to point that way.... No serious links to wingers, attacking fullbacks, Gray talking about playing through the middle, Kaputska playing CM at the weekend, the amount of CM's we have AND Puel is known to use it. Make a sense to me.
Tielemans63 Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Talented player but with a horrendous injury record. Too much of a gamble for the wages he would command. We should steer well clear imho. 1
CollinsLCFC Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Decent player, unfortunate with his injuries. He needs to leave Liverpool and would be decent if he stays fit. Right price and wages wouldn't be a bad signing
Gerard Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 I'm always amazed how many of our fans would like to see us add players who are decent but don't improve the first XI. We spend £20m on Ings then he sits on the bench with another four or five strikers and we don't have the money to spend on other positions. We love stock piling mediocrity, it's bizzare. 2
FLAN Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 What happened to the other thread? The one where I said “ings can only get better”? 3
Max Wall Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 I think Ings is better than mediocre......when fit and playing regularly. Depending on the planned formation, he could easily force himself into our starting line up.....when fit. A place in the squad would really depend on us offloading though as we have too many forwards already. However, the fee and wages he is likely to want/command would prove too much of a risk for me and could be better spent elsewhere.
AKCJ Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 I think he's a better player than 20m. It's injuries that are his problem. He was in the England squad for Burnley, at his best he'd be our 2nd best striker. For 20m that'd be good business. Slight gamble but one worth taking with Vardy not getting younger.
Tielemans63 Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 There's a lot of 'if fit' comments in here. Ings hasn't been fit for more than 2 years.
AKCJ Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Paddy. said: There's a lot of 'if fit' comments in here. Ings hasn't been fit for more than 2 years. Barring a couple of slight niggles he's been fine since last Christmas. Before that he was recovering from an ACL injury. Edited 24 July 2018 by AKCJ
Max Wall Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Just now, Paddy. said: There's a lot of 'if fit' comments in here. Ings hasn't been fit for more than 2 years That's precisely why there's so many 'if fit' comments tbh. Of course, you can't guarantee future fitness but it's his injury problems that probably put most people off, otherwise, there's no doubt he's good enough to play for us.
weller54 Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Ffs.. He makes Mendy and Jack Wheelchair look bulletproof! 1
Liamlcfc1 Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Swear I posted this topic last night with a link don't know why I bothered 1
Liamlcfc1 Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 can't understand why it was deleted it was a verified journalist on twitter from the Liverpool echo
ARM1968 Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 Why should we clear out Liverpool’s dead wood when we can’t shift our own? 4
Nick Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 I think he's better than everything we have and would be a great back up for Vardy or as a third/squad striker but he won't play regularly here as Vardy won't be dropped, so very doubtful he'd come. I'd keep Vardy, Nacho and acquire Ings and say goodbye if possible to the rest, sadly including Okazaki who I love deeply!
Nick Posted 24 July 2018 Posted 24 July 2018 16 minutes ago, Liamlcfc1 said: Swear I posted this topic last night with a link don't know why I bothered I think it descended very quickly into a page full of daft puns.
Recommended Posts