Foxxed Posted 1 December 2018 Posted 1 December 2018 2 minutes ago, pmcla26 said: I disagree with the formation thing, how many times under Puel have we played anything different from a 4-2-3-1? Only time I can think is against Man City and he changed it at half time back to 4231. I mean his time at Lille.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 1 December 2018 Posted 1 December 2018 Get him back off loan in January and let’s have him in our first team squad please
MPH Posted 1 December 2018 Posted 1 December 2018 1 hour ago, Bob Weasel Fox said: Get him back off loan in January and let’s have him in our first team squad please he needs to be playing regularly. i can’t see who he would replace right now in the first team?
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 1 December 2018 Posted 1 December 2018 12 minutes ago, MPH said: he needs to be playing regularly. i can’t see who he would replace right now in the first team? Sub to start with and he would come on for Gray or Albrighton for example
MPH Posted 1 December 2018 Posted 1 December 2018 14 minutes ago, Bob Weasel Fox said: Sub to start with and he would come on for Gray or Albrighton for example i’d rather he get a full season starting for west Brom. he’d learn more than making a few sub appearances for us this season.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 1 December 2018 Posted 1 December 2018 58 minutes ago, MPH said: i’d rather he get a full season starting for west Brom. he’d learn more than making a few sub appearances for us this season. Yeah I sort of agree with you but also want to see him develop with us at some point too
vanity Posted 1 December 2018 Posted 1 December 2018 On 25/11/2018 at 03:14, FIF said: I like him but I really think a lot of FTers are in cuckoo land calling for his return and expecting him to "dominate" in the prem. A recall in January could knock him back years. It would be unlikely to see him.dominate, but he could be the difference in a game or three. How many points would he need to add to our season total to be worth pulling from his current developmental stage? We could certainly do with him taking a bit of pressure off Maddison. Mads is all too easy to take out of the game at times, but playing with Barnes would give us a second player capable of those seeing eye passes into dangerous parts of the pitch for Vards & Co. Frankly I'd love to see us go three at the back and add a target man, though if not that, I think Barnes could be an interesting option some matches. Or more likely, a late game substitute when we need a goal, especially as Maddison slows down quite a bit by minute 70 or so. While I personally don't believe we should recall him this season, I do think he could add 4-6 points or so to our season total.
Max Power Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 Two minutes in and he’s already skinned two men and fizzed a perfect outside of the boot cross in for Rodriguez to miss from two yards. Serious player this boy.
Babylon Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 5 minutes ago, Max Power said: Two minutes in and he’s already skinned two men and fizzed a perfect outside of the boot cross in for Rodriguez to miss from two yards. Serious player this boy. Considering our lack of creative players, I'm starting to change my position on him staying there tbh. He'll get game time because we've got so few options to bring on in attack.
Max Power Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 7 minutes ago, Babylon said: Considering our lack of creative players, I'm starting to change my position on him staying there tbh. He'll get game time because we've got so few options to bring on in attack. He’d definitely get minutes here and I am sure would contribute even with the step up in quality. It’s just whether the benefit of him playing a full season with all the ups and downs as the creative force for a side chasing promotion may improve him so much more for next season that we sacrifice any short term benefits this.
Cincinnati Fox Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 Really should be with us, clearly good enough. really annoys me we wasted £££ on Ghezzal
gurru991 Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 He is looking strong in W Brom / Brentford game. I still think he should stay at W Brom for the season. He's getting regular starts and looks better every time I see him.
matty98 Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 Seems to rarely give the ball away but always seems likely to do something when he gets the ball, the only question on mind about whether he'd play for us is does he have the work rate? Seems to not track back or press the opposition, could just be how he's been asked to play though
Foxxed Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 I think he's changed wings. He's not really got into the game. We should never loan anyone to West Brom. It's a ****ing nightmare to identify shirt numbers on their horror show of a kit.
yorkie1999 Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 13 minutes ago, lcfcsnow said: He’s struggled quite a bit in this game Well, apart from the goal. How anyone can say this lad is not the real deal is beyond me.
Foxxed Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 Smashes it with one foot, and it's deflected back to him. And with his other foot he volleys the deflection into the net. He's not bad at football, this lad.
irishfoxkev Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 Great reaction to hit it with his left foot after first right footed effort was blocked
poggypogpog Posted 3 December 2018 Posted 3 December 2018 It’s probably already been said several dozen times, but I’d still say a promotion push with Brom is better for his development than a spot in the subs bench with us. It did Muzzy Izzet no harm!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.