Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Would rather he play games and be coached by Brendan Rodgers than play the odd u23 game with Beaglehole. When Morgan likely leaves in the summer he'll be primed and ready to roll 

Posted

SLB.    Ludricous.  Pay all this money for him only to play on the Scottish Pub League?   Someone is having a laugh with Leicester City.   He will learn nothing playing at that standard. Keep him here and he can fight for his place.

  • Like 1
Posted

He was signed for the future.  A loan and game time is better than 5th choice this season.

Next season Morgan will leave and possibily Maguire. He’ll get his chance.

Posted
1 minute ago, Finn Claw II said:

He was signed for the future.  A loan and game time is better than 5th choice this season.

Next season Morgan will leave and possibily Maguire. He’ll get his chance.

Who says he is 5th choice??  If he steps up to the plate he may move above Evans and Morgan over the next months or so?   We just do not know right now. He has played CL games and performed in a league that 'maybe' on par with Scotland.

And why the Fuchs should we pay 13 million for someone to play for Celtic?  Am I missing something here? Obviously, if this is being seriously talked about.

Posted
1 hour ago, jonthefox said:

Is it?. Would you be offended if someone called you a Brit ?.

A Scot would.

  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

Who says he is 5th choice??  If he steps up to the plate he may move above Evans and Morgan over the next months or so?   We just do not know right now. He has played CL games and performed in a league that 'maybe' on par with Scotland.

And why the Fuchs should we pay 13 million for someone to play for Celtic?  Am I missing something here? Obviously, if this is being seriously talked about.

Yes you are missing something. He currently appears to be our 5th choice CB so makes sense to send him out on loan to a decent club where he can play competitively and develop further.

It's a win win for all parties IMO as long as we insert a recall clause.

  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

SLB.    Ludricous.  Pay all this money for him only to play on the Scottish Pub League?   Someone is having a laugh with Leicester City.   He will learn nothing playing at that standard. Keep him here and he can fight for his place.

You could argue that Van Dijk learned a thing or two playing at that standard at the same age as benekovic.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, jonthefox said:

Is it?. Would you be offended if someone called you a Brit ?.

 

22 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

A Scot would.

Brit was an contentious example from the poster.

Let me try one. Why is calling a Turkish man a Turk any different than calling an Australian an Aussie though? Seemed a very strange thing to call highly offensive.  If he'd said it's offensive that people don't know his name yet, I could have understood it more even though I still probably don't agree.

 

Edit - If the term Turk has suddenly become an offensive word and I'm just unaware of that fact, I apologise in advance to anyone offended by my response to these posts.

Edited by Max Wall
Posted
3 hours ago, Haywood_6 said:

Dare i say it - Morgan has had a decent start to the season and he won't get ahead of Maguire or Soyuncu. So he's left with the U23's

Celtic would be far better than that, it makes sense.

 

Oooh you can't say anything positive about Morgan on here. :ph34r:

I agree though, we still have Morgan for another season and there is life in the old dog yet despite what the mob thinks. With Maguire, Evans and Soyuncu as well then getting Benkovic some game time when he is going to be 4th or 5th choice here would be beneficial for us and him.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Gerard said:

Oooh you can't say anything positive about Morgan on here. :ph34r:

I agree though, we still have Morgan for another season and there is life in the old dog yet despite what the mob thinks. With Maguire, Evans and Soyuncu as well then getting Benkovic some game time when he is going to be 4th or 5th choice here would be beneficial for us and him.

Partly a racist response - I think a lot of it is to do with him being a Morg.

 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, mozartfox said:

Who says he is 5th choice??  If he steps up to the plate he may move above Evans and Morgan over the next months or so?   We just do not know right now. He has played CL games and performed in a league that 'maybe' on par with Scotland.

And why the Fuchs should we pay 13 million for someone to play for Celtic?  Am I missing something here? Obviously, if this is being seriously talked about.

the spl is ranked 26th while the croatian league is ranked 16th so I would rather not send him to the spl send him to the championship

https://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/country/#/yr/2018

As for playing him maybe in cup games for now 

Edited by Fightforever
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Max Wall said:

 

Brit was an contentious example from the poster.

Let me try one. Why is calling a Turkish man a Turk any different than calling an Australian an Aussie though? Seemed a very strange thing to call highly offensive.  If he'd said it's offensive that people don't know his name yet, I could have understood it more even though I still probably don't agree.

 

Edit - If the term Turk has suddenly become an offensive word and I'm just unaware of that fact, I apologise in advance to anyone offended by my response to these posts.

He could have just said "Soyunco", you know, as in the guy's actual name, instead of "the Turk"?  

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RumbleFox said:

He could have just said "Soyunco", you know, as in the guy's actual name, instead of "the Turk"?  

Hence why I posted what I did. For the poster that said it, to be called highly offensive, was an over-reaction in my opinion.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Max Wall said:

Hence why I posted what I did. For the poster that said it, to be called highly offensive, was an over-reaction in my opinion.

Yeah it may have been, I am not really focussing on whether the actual term "Turk" is offensive or not but seems odd to define someone purely on their nationality when their given name would be much more appropriate.  X

Edited by RumbleFox
Posted
5 hours ago, themightyfin said:

Turk is highly offensive.

Really?

 

im often called ‘ the Brit’ by my colleagues at work... didn’t realize I was supposed to be offended!

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, RumbleFox said:

Yeah it may have been, I am not really focussing on whether the actual term "Turk" is offensive or not but seems odd to define someone purely on their nationality when there given name would be much more appropriate.  X

I do agree. I've never once called Soyunco 'The Turk'. I just thought the post saying it was highly offensive was over the top tbh.

 

And, I don't want to fight with you Rumble X :thumbup:

Edited by Max Wall
  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Max Wall said:

I do agree. I've never once called Soyunco 'The Turk'. I just thought the post was over the top tbh.

I think we agree I am just saying he made an odd choice of words and whilst maybe not "highly offensive" is a strange way to define a person.

Anyway, I am all for him going on loan to Celtic as I live in Glasgow so might be able to see him and as much as I dislike Rodgers he is a decent coach.

 

X

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, RumbleFox said:

I think we agree I am just saying he made an odd choice of words and whilst maybe not "highly offensive" is a strange way to define a person.

Anyway, I am all for him going on loan to Celtic as I live in Glasgow so might be able to see him and as much as I dislike Rodgers he is a decent coach.

 

X

We also agree on Rodgers then. I'm not sure what it is about him, it's just something. I know that's irrational lol

Yeah, it would do Benkovic some good I reckon, as I've posted previously. It looks like there's quite a split in opinion on it here though. Although the Croatian league is higher rated according to the poll referenced on here. Playing in front of an average crowd on 5000 odd doesn't really compare with playing at Celtic Park in front of 60,000 every two weeks. Scottish football is also more similar to ours than Croatian football. I see the argument for him staying to fight for his place but a loan would depend on how far down the list of CB's Puel and the coaches see him. There's also the opportunity to put in a recall clause.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Max Wall said:

We also agree on Rodgers then. I'm not sure what it is about him, it's just something. I know that's irrational lol

Yeah, it would do Benkovic some good I reckon, as I've posted previously. It looks like there's quite a split in opinion on it here though. Although the Croatian league is higher rated according to the poll referenced on here. Playing in front of an average crowd on 5000 odd doesn't really compare with playing at Celtic Park in front of 60,000 every two weeks. Scottish football is also more similar to ours than Croatian football. I see the argument for him staying to fight for his place but a loan would depend on how far down the list of CB's Puel and the coaches see him. There's also the opportunity to put in a recall clause.

Definitely.  I don't even know what it is but he makes me want to punch him.

The state of Scottish football is pretty dire but as least he would be getting more used to the UK and, as you say, Celtic are a huge club and as an experience it would be good for him.  Rodgers also plays out from the back and likes possession football so hopefully it would be a good fit in that sense too.  X

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Sounds like a good idea. Puel alluded that the deal was opportunistic in that when they found out that Dinamo Zagreb were willing to sell, they went for it because they thought he was a good player and well worth the money even if he's not going to go seamlessly into the first team. That league doesn't have the best quality, but the physical nature is similar to the Premier League and Championship, and hey Virgil Van Dijk played for Celtic and he didn't turn out too badly when he moved to Southampton. 

Edited by StriderHiryu
  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...