Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Outfox the Fox

Benkovic January Recall?

By Outfox the Fox, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

NaijaFox

NaijaFox

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, los dedos said:

You make it sound like we will just cave as soon as a big club come along . He's got a contract  and unless a club offer very silly money he isn't going anywhere .

He’ll be gone faster than we can learn to properly pronounce his name for an offer in the region of £30m which is pocket money for the Big 6. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Foxxed

Foxxed

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, sylofox said:

Best hope Puel don't get sacked anytime soon then. Or pray his replacement likes to play the youngsters. 

That's pretty much my position on Puel. I'll happily switch my support for a manager who can keep up in the Prem and is as good with young players. But I haven't seen him yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, NaijaFox said:

He’ll be gone faster than we can learn to properly pronounce his name for an offer in the region of £30m which is pocket money for the Big 6. 

Yeah because we let Mahrez go so easy. Also a good job Mags fought tooth and nail to stay here and not go OT. 

 

We are no longer a selling club. In other news (this maybe old news to most. But it's going to be breaking news for some.) May 2016 Leicester City won the premier league title. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hanan96

Hanan96

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, sylofox said:

Yeah because we let Mahrez go so easy. Also a good job Mags fought tooth and nail to stay here and not go OT. 

 

We are no longer a selling club. In other news (this maybe old news to most. But it's going to be breaking news for some.) May 2016 Leicester City won the premier league title. 

Mahrez didn't go so easy. 

He attracted interest since the title win season, we didn't bother to sell

He requested transfer, we still didn't sell

Until the point he running away from the club, we finally sell him.. 6 months later 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Hanan96 said:

Mahrez didn't go so easy. 

He attracted interest since the title win season, we didn't bother to sell

He requested transfer, we still didn't sell

Until the point he running away from the club, we finally sell him.. 6 months later 

Whoooooshhhhh that's my point. We don't just sell any more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deebhoy

Deebhoy

Posted
Posted

I love football and have supported Leicester for over 35 years but some fans of Premier League teams are sanctimonious delusional pricks with short memories. I think the current Celtic team really would be terrified of Huddersfield, Southampton, Cardiff, Burnley, Newcastle, Watford, Wolves yes and even Leicester et al.  Yea right.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NaijaFox

NaijaFox

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Hanan96 said:

Mahrez didn't go so easy. 

He attracted interest since the title win season, we didn't bother to sell

He requested transfer, we still didn't sell

Until the point he running away from the club, we finally sell him.. 6 months later 

Wrong post

Edited by NaijaFox
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NaijaFox

NaijaFox

Posted
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, sylofox said:

Yeah because we let Mahrez go so easy. Also a good job Mags fought tooth and nail to stay here and not go OT. 

 

We are no longer a selling club. In other news (this maybe old news to most. But it's going to be breaking news for some.) May 2016 Leicester City won the premier league title. 

He's NO Mahrez. Not even a Maguire. And frankly (even in today's silly money market), 30 mil for unproven talent is hardly "so easy"!

Edited by NaijaFox
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, NaijaFox said:

You do recognize that his take is basically a Strawman’s Argument? We don’t have to be a so-called “selling club” to sell players.

You don't understand what a strawman is if you think what sylo argued is one. Given you're misrepresenting their argument, you're closer to that.

 

We won't capitulate and sell immediately for 30m; we showed with Mahrez, who stayed at least a year longer than anyone expected, and with Maguire in the summer just gone, that we won't let players go easily, and they're not leaving unless the deal is right for us. We're not a club that lets it's players go for the first non-derisory offer (which is what everyone understands a selling club to be - no-one considers Barcelona a selling club for getting £200m for Neymar) these days.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted

. he is getting valuable experience at a decent level with a good coach.

 

he will win someting which is good for his mentality (assume he won stuff back home aswell)

 

we have plenty of centre back options this season 

 

we will need him next season

 

unless we get a ridiculous offer for Harry in jan or one of existing centre backs suffers a bad injury, he won’t be recalled

 

he will be in our first team squad next season 

 

what else is there to add ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bert

Bert

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, sylofox said:

Yeah because we let Mahrez go so easy. Also a good job Mags fought tooth and nail to stay here and not go OT. 

 

We are no longer a selling club. In other news (this maybe old news to most. But it's going to be breaking news for some.) May 2016 Leicester City won the premier league title. 

Well we didn’t let Mahrez go easy did we, if that was the case he’d have gone as soon as he handed his first transfer request in. Maguire also didn’t fight tooth and nail to stay here. He was told he wasn’t going anywhere and no bid would be accepted whatever the price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nicolo Barella

Nicolo Barella

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Bert said:

Well we didn’t let Mahrez go easy did we, if that was the case he’d have gone as soon as he handed his first transfer request in. Maguire also didn’t fight tooth and nail to stay here. He was told he wasn’t going anywhere and no bid would be accepted whatever the price. 

He was being sarcastic :P

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Bert said:

Well we didn’t let Mahrez go easy did we, if that was the case he’d have gone as soon as he handed his first transfer request in. Maguire also didn’t fight tooth and nail to stay here. He was told he wasn’t going anywhere and no bid would be accepted whatever the price. 

You really missed that one Bert. lol lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mozartfox

mozartfox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, NaijaFox said:

You do recognize that his take is basically a Strawman’s Argument? We don’t have to be a so-called “selling club” to sell players.

Sorry.  You have lost me.  Basically if we want to keep Benkovic we can.  If a big team comes in and we do not want to sell at that point in time and for the fee they are offering, recent history tells me the player will not be sold off.  Simples.  

 

PS I do not know any Streamen so cannot comment on that statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
On 01/12/2018 at 11:06, NaijaFox said:

He’ll be gone faster than we can learn to properly pronounce his name for an offer in the region of £30m which is pocket money for the Big 6. 

 

23 hours ago, sylofox said:

Yeah because we let Mahrez go so easy. Also a good job Mags fought tooth and nail to stay here and not go OT. 

 

We are no longer a selling club. In other news (this maybe old news to most. But it's going to be breaking news for some.) May 2016 Leicester City won the premier league title. 

 

21 minutes ago, Bert said:

Well we didn’t let Mahrez go easy did we, if that was the case he’d have gone as soon as he handed his first transfer request in. Maguire also didn’t fight tooth and nail to stay here. He was told he wasn’t going anywhere and no bid would be accepted whatever the price. 

That explain it Bert. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

Sorry.  You have lost me.  Basically if we want to keep Benkovic we can.  If a big team comes in and we do not want to sell at that point in time and for the fee they are offering, recent history tells me the player will not be sold off.  Simples.  

 

PS I do not know any Streamen so cannot comment on that statement.

Leave it mozartfox he's either a troll or has no understanding of our club. Probably a Croatian fan boy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...