Innovindil Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-53064929 A black trainee vicar was rejected for a job by church bosses who said his potential parishioners were "monochrome white working class". In an email sent in response to his application, Augustine Tanner-Ihm was told he "might feel uncomfortable" in the curacy role at the parish. The email said despite his "obvious gifts", it was "not worth pursuing a conversation" about the vacancy in southern England. What the actual ****. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 26 minutes ago, Innovindil said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-53064929 A black trainee vicar was rejected for a job by church bosses who said his potential parishioners were "monochrome white working class". In an email sent in response to his application, Augustine Tanner-Ihm was told he "might feel uncomfortable" in the curacy role at the parish. The email said despite his "obvious gifts", it was "not worth pursuing a conversation" about the vacancy in southern England. What the actual ****. Can believe there is issues in the church relating to racism unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoboFox Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 (edited) 4 hours ago, Thefox81 said: Matt Hancock thanks 'Daniel' Rashford for his hard work 😂 Hancock stands out as particularly f**king useless among a cabinet of total half-wits. A total embarrassment. Edited 17 June 2020 by RoboFox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finnaldo Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 49 minutes ago, Innovindil said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-53064929 A black trainee vicar was rejected for a job by church bosses who said his potential parishioners were "monochrome white working class". In an email sent in response to his application, Augustine Tanner-Ihm was told he "might feel uncomfortable" in the curacy role at the parish. The email said despite his "obvious gifts", it was "not worth pursuing a conversation" about the vacancy in southern England. What the actual ****. Sort of story you’d expect to hear out of some Evangelical church in America. If they genuinely believe this could be an issue with their congregation they should be questioning quite how Christian they really are. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 13 minutes ago, Finnaldo said: Sort of story you’d expect to hear out of some Evangelical church in America. If they genuinely believe this could be an issue with their congregation they should be questioning quite how Christian they really are. I'm not so sure about that. Evangelical churches stateside sometimes turn out stuff like this from their pastors... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 All sorts of disgusting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Innovindil Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 15 minutes ago, leicsmac said: I'm not so sure about that. Evangelical churches stateside sometimes turn out stuff like this from their pastors... His initials pretty much spell out how I feel. Ewwwwww. Jackass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban.spaceman Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 20 hours ago, Milo said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-53060894 Racist breakfast cereal. She seems to be making an entirely rational, well thought out and convincing argument. I'm off to clear out my kitchen cupboards which are clearly a haven of bigotry and prejudice. Remember, Labour actually selected her to stand for election AND THEN SHE GOT ELECTED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban.spaceman Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 Also, The Onion last week: Real life today: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 (edited) Now this I don’t fully get. Seeing people of the same race/colour is supposed to be healthy along with all races, so why not BAME ethnicities? Its not like it’s the old Robinson’s Jam label Edited 17 June 2020 by Dahnsouff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxile5 Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 (edited) 25 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Also, The Onion last week: Real life today: This is just ****ing baffling. Are they changing the colonel on KFC because he's representative of a long dead racial stereotype - the old Southern Gentleman? Do we remove the Milky Bar Kid? And the woman from time Tapatio bottle because she represents a Mexican stereotype? Honestly dumb as all shit. Edited 17 June 2020 by foxile5 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 1 minute ago, foxile5 said: This is just ****ing baffling. Are they changing the colonel on KFC because he's representative of a long dead racial stereotype - the old Southern Gentleman? Do we remove the Milky Bar Kid? And the woman from time Tapatio bottle because she represents a Mexican stereotype? Honestly dumb as all shit. Plan is to remove all racial profiles from such products and replace them with an image of Mohammed 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxile5 Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 6 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: Plan is to remove all racial profiles from such products and replace them with an image of Mohammed Seriously, though. I get that the Gollywog is not on. That places like the Black Boy with a freakish depiction of a black person isn't okay. I understand the statue of Colston offends, even if I disagree with the manner of its removal. This I am struggling to see the offence in. Can we just not show black people at all? Even in a positive light? What's the problem with Aunt Jemima? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 Just now, foxile5 said: Seriously, though. I get that the Gollywog is not on. That places like the Black Boy with a freakish depiction of a black person isn't okay. I understand the statue of Colston offends, even if I disagree with the manner of its removal. This I am struggling to see the offence in. Can we just not show black people at all? Even in a positive light? What's the problem with Aunt Jemima? Totally agree, we should not take images of non caricatured people as offensive, certainly not as a de facto position. It is madness.. The Colonel though...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoboFox Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 (edited) . Edited 17 June 2020 by RoboFox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr The Singh Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 4 hours ago, Dahnsouff said: Can believe there is issues in the church relating to racism unfortunately. Really, the founder of the church has systematically gone from being brown to white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milo Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 12 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said: Really, the founder of the church has systematically gone from being brown to white. But, but,,Jesus was a blue eyed white boy...all the movies told me so 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dahnsouff Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 18 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said: Really, the founder of the church has systematically gone from being brown to white. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
urban.spaceman Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 Genuinely didn’t know they were still a thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarehamFox Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 2 hours ago, Dr The Singh said: Really, the founder of the church has systematically gone from being brown to white. Love most of your posts, but how many people from the old middle east are brown? Even 2000 years later, just a question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuna Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr The Singh Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 53 minutes ago, WarehamFox said: Love most of your posts, but how many people from the old middle east are brown? Even 2000 years later, just a question. Go on the internet, Google it, it has been scientifically proven. The oldest pictures of Jesus, he was brown. Just a question how many Palestinians are white, today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarehamFox Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 4 minutes ago, Dr The Singh said: Go on the internet, Google it, it has been scientifically proven. The oldest pictures of Jesus, he was brown. Just a question how many Palestinians are white, today? I bow to your knowledge. Strange that most Jewish people today look more white than brown. All very confusing. Like I say I like your posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr The Singh Posted 17 June 2020 Share Posted 17 June 2020 3 minutes ago, WarehamFox said: I bow to your knowledge. Strange that most Jewish people today look more white than brown. All very confusing. Like I say I like your posts. I dunno about that there are reports he could be light skinned, however he isn't the blond dude that people have on there crosses and in the movies 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jattdogg Posted 18 June 2020 Share Posted 18 June 2020 4 hours ago, Dr The Singh said: I dunno about that there are reports he could be light skinned, however he isn't the blond dude that people have on there crosses and in the movies Bet he was chinese and everyone is wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts