Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Fox92

Brendan Rodgers

By Fox92, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

sylofox

sylofox

Posted
Posted
On 22/09/2022 at 19:30, Manley Farrington-Brown said:

But he (probably) didn't get sacked because of the defeat to Seville; he (probably) got sacked because we were crap in the league.

Not as crap as we are now ffs.

  • Haha 1
stevostadium

stevostadium

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, LCFCJohn said:

Trying not to vomit at that thought but did raise the question in my head, Rodgers to replace Southgate?

OR EVEN WORSE

SOUTHGATE TO REPLACE RODGERS

BOTH INEPT TOOLS

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Foxxed

Foxxed

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, Claridge said:

We are going down, just hope we beat forest and they come down as well

I like how you’re dealing with our predicament. “I don’t want the misery gone, since I’m no idealistic, I just want Forest to suffer too”

Deeg67

Deeg67

Posted
Posted

Ugly truth is, the best thing for the club would be for Forest to tonk us so badly - 10-0 or something - that even Top would be forced to act.  I know a lot of bile would be swallowed here, but for our survival that would be better than three points.

  • Like 1
cityfanlee23

cityfanlee23

Posted
Posted

I wonder whether they are looking at the table and thinking “well 5 points from safety isn’t too bad” or something along those lines, I imagine if the teams around us had taken points and we were say 7-9 points from safety if he would have been sacked already. I’m running out of logical reasons why he is being given time? At the moment we have the talent in the squad to realistically fluke a couple of results and we would be out of the relegation zone, are they waiting until it’s too big of a gap before they do something? 
 

I know FT is not sound methodology, but surely to god the sheer number of people on this forum who want him gone, and the ratio of “Out” to “In” on here counts for something? How are the board not seeing what everyone else in the fanbase is seeing? 

cityfanlee23

cityfanlee23

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Deeg67 said:

Ugly truth is, the best thing for the club would be for Forest to tonk us so badly - 10-0 or something - that even Top would be forced to act.  I know a lot of bile would be swallowed here, but for our survival that would be better than three points.

Make no mistake, I’ll have sick from my chin to my feet but I’m a forest fan during that match. I’m all for the silver lining, if it takes a 10-0 for us to replace Rodgers I’ll take it happily. 

I’m done with the bloke. 
Him still being here is putting me off the club, genuinely have had no interest in watching us. 

  • Like 3
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
Just now, cityfanlee23 said:

I wonder whether they are looking at the table and thinking “well 5 points from safety isn’t too bad” or something along those lines, I imagine if the teams around us had taken points and we were say 7-9 points from safety if he would have been sacked already. I’m running out of logical reasons why he is being given time? At the moment we have the talent in the squad to realistically fluke a couple of results and we would be out of the relegation zone, are they waiting until it’s too big of a gap before they do something? 
 

I know FT is not sound methodology, but surely to god the sheer number of people on this forum who want him gone, and the ratio of “Out” to “In” on here counts for something? How are the board not seeing what everyone else in the fanbase is seeing? 

It isnt just about discarding the manager 

 

we still have a game Monday week and we need to go into that with a strategy etc etc 

 

those making the calls may believe that rodgers is more likely to get us three points than stowell. If they have a target to bring in then they won’t want to have too long a gap between coaches …

cityfanlee23

cityfanlee23

Posted
Posted
Just now, st albans fox said:

It isnt just about discarding the manager 

 

we still have a game Monday week and we need to go into that with a strategy etc etc 

 

those making the calls may believe that rodgers is more likely to get us three points than stowell. If they have a target to bring in then they won’t want to have too long a gap between coaches …

I fully appreciate this, my main concern is “what strategy” could the possibly see Rodgers having given how we’ve played over the last 40 games or so? And if they genuinely believe that Rodgers given the last 40 games has a better chance of getting the team prepared for a single match than Stowell does, then why the hell is Stowell here? 
 

Don’t get me wrong I like Stowell, but they have such little confidence in giving one of our top coaches the reigns for a couple of matches to try and get a quick bounce from the players or maybe let the players play with a bit of freedom and express themselves to try to win, I really don’t know what to think. 
 

The best coaches at the club should have the capacity to take over for a couple of games, if they don’t they shouldn’t be here. But I do understand your logic.

st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
24 minutes ago, Ely fox said:

Is it not the officially worst start to a Premier League Season EVER. Sorry if this has been said before. I’m sure it has. But 😯 

I believe palace were worse a few years ago after seven games 

  • Sad 1
BKLFox

BKLFox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, cityfanlee23 said:

I wonder whether they are looking at the table and thinking “well 5 points from safety isn’t too bad” or something along those lines, I imagine if the teams around us had taken points and we were say 7-9 points from safety if he would have been sacked already. I’m running out of logical reasons why he is being given time? At the moment we have the talent in the squad to realistically fluke a couple of results and we would be out of the relegation zone, are they waiting until it’s too big of a gap before they do something? 
 

I know FT is not sound methodology, but surely to god the sheer number of people on this forum who want him gone, and the ratio of “Out” to “In” on here counts for something? How are the board not seeing what everyone else in the fanbase is seeing? 

It probably is that, 2 games from safety with 31 games to play.

 

With regards to out/in your looking at a small snapshot of fans on a forum that are being whipped up by every comment posted by a like minded poster and not an overall view of the whole fan base.

 

As for no one defending him on here I guess it’s 1 way heavy just like the politics thread where only the out respond due to anyone speaking against are targeted by the mob and called brain dead morons and such like & now both threads have lost the ability of discussion rendering them pointless 🤷‍♂️ 

  • Like 1
Pliskin

Pliskin

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, kenny said:

Have a load of posts been deleted from this thread???

Seems like it. Anything speculating Rodgers going have been removed #democracy. 

Stinkenzo

Stinkenzo

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

I believe palace were worse a few years ago after seven games 

And stayed up. 

 

FYI those who are already looking forward to visiting Bloomfield Road next season 

Free Falling Foxes

Free Falling Foxes

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, cityfanlee23 said:

I wonder whether they are looking at the table and thinking “well 5 points from safety isn’t too bad” or something along those lines, I imagine if the teams around us had taken points and we were say 7-9 points from safety if he would have been sacked already. I’m running out of logical reasons why he is being given time?
 

 

BR's contract can't just be heavily weighted in his favour only - surely?

 

There must be a caveat along the lines of, if we are so many points off the top six after x games, or in a relegation spot at a certain point he can be sacked for a much less amount than the total it looks like he'll get.

 

If there is such a clause, it may explain why the board are waiting. We can only hope such a point is very, very close.

Claridge

Claridge

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, cityfanlee23 said:

Make no mistake, I’ll have sick from my chin to my feet but I’m a forest fan during that match. I’m all for the silver lining, if it takes a 10-0 for us to replace Rodgers I’ll take it happily. 

I’m done with the bloke. 
Him still being here is putting me off the club, genuinely have had no interest in watching us. 

Rather win 1-0 with them missing 10 pens and then other teams beating us 10-0

Bluetintedspecs

Bluetintedspecs

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, kenny said:

Have a load of posts been deleted from this thread???

themightyfin posted a cryptic message along the lines of Good old Top or similar and some petulant keyboard warriors had a personal pop at him.

  • Thanks 1
trugerkem

trugerkem

Posted
Posted

Not a fan of Rodgers and never have been since day 1 ….but I still don’t want Leicester City F.C to lose just to have an excuse to get rid( and that’s no guarantee anyway)

sacreblueits442

sacreblueits442

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Deeg67 said:

Ugly truth is, the best thing for the club would be for Forest to tonk us so badly - 10-0 or something - that even Top would be forced to act.  I know a lot of bile would be swallowed here, but for our survival that would be better than three points.

...even if your wish came into effect, we would never be able to live with it, ever!!!

LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, stevostadium said:

OR EVEN WORSE

SOUTHGATE TO REPLACE RODGERS

BOTH INEPT TOOLS

Yeah that was the suggestion in the post I quoted so I felt more positive thinking the opposite!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...