Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Pleased with that, but do we need Wilf Youri and Soumare v Burnley at home? Front 3 looks really exciting though and guess it’s a very balanced XI. I’m keen for some Kelechi minutes and not so sure he fits smoothly into that XI anywhere bar in place of Vardy. 
 

At least he’s dropped Maddison. Assume Evans isn’t fully fit yet, or ever! 

Guest TaggertvsWise
Posted

Good team. Not saying I was practically the only one to applaud the signing of Lookman but…. Actually sod it I am saying it. 

Posted

Can't complain with that too much. Madders dropped while so badly out of form and Lookman given a start on the right in a 4 3 3.

Posted
Just now, GorlestonFox said:

What does Nacho need to do?

Not piss in Brendan's tea? I get we need Soumare in midfield in a way but Rodgers is one stubborn b, though admittedly no Perez or Maddison. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Phube said:

Nacho... :(

To be fair, Burnley are a physical team. So we are playing 433 instead of 4231, so there's no number 10, hence no Maddison or Nacho (or Perez even) in that position. To me this is the right call. If we were up against Villa for example, a good team but less physical then 4231 might be better.

 

But to be honest in modern football i think 433 is one of the best systems you can use if you aren't blessed with billions of pounds to spend. Liverpool the shining light for how deadly it can be.

  • Like 3
Posted
Just now, hejammy said:

Who do you suggest he replaces from that 11?

Yeah exactly, he would only start if we were playing 2 up top or instead of Maddison.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...