Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Rudder’s pigeon is piling on the timber due to lack of activity this window. 

E2252F17-6710-415E-A695-F80359AE7EE4.jpeg

  • Haha 3
Guest Col city fan
Posted
Just now, foxfanazer said:

Barnes, Maddison and Fofana are the 3 that should be completely off limits. Maybe even Wilf, although I can see him moving on soon

I’d add KDH over Wilf personally 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

I’d add KDH over Wilf personally 

God I completely forgot about KDH! lol

 

But I think we've got him for a good few years anyway

Posted

If we have to sell key assets because we can't shift squad players due to high wages, the well run club notion has to be changed.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Corky said:

If we have to sell key assets because we can't shift squad players due to high wages, the well run club notion has to be changed.

Yes it does. A well run club does not run itself into this sort of dead end.  EVERY other Premier League club is buying. We are not. 

Guest Lcfc82
Posted

I’d sooner us keep him and not sign anyone this summer.

As others have said he’s one of a small group of players who should not be sold at any cost.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Lcfc82 said:

I’d sooner us keep him and not sign anyone this summer.

As others have said he’s one of a small group of players who should not be sold at any cost.

Yeah I agree. Originally I was frustrated about lack of transfer business but the more I think about it its probably for the best. Give Rodgers this season with hopefully a fully fit squad and see what he can do with it. If he underperforms then give the next manager a budget for the rebuild if we have the money. We'll only go backwards selling the likes of Barnes

Edited by foxfanazer
  • Like 2
Posted

Newcastle aren't going to pay what we would want for him (which certainly wouldn't be £50m, and they wouldn't pay that either)

 

Sounds like it might just be rumours to try and put pressure on other moves they are making anyway

 

"The fee is up there with what Everton will need for Gordon who has been a Newcastle target for weeks. But the clubs are well apart on the fee as the Toon are only in at £25 million.

 

Gordon’s camp are still trying to make the move happen and working overtime to find a figure that suits neatly for both sides.

 

Newcastle have also had to look at Jack Harrison as Leeds as an alternative. He could be sold for less than the other two options and they may opt for that."

Posted (edited)

The problem I have is I dont have confidence he would be adequately replaced, we could sell him for maybe 50M, buy a CB as we always do and and have a million CB's now, extend some contracts, and then get a panic buy/loan to replace him last week of window.  Typical LCFC style.

 

Going into the season with no wingers would be insane.

Edited by Chrysalis
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Newcastle aren't going to pay what we would want for him (which certainly wouldn't be £50m, and they wouldn't pay that either)

 

Sounds like it might just be rumours to try and put pressure on other moves they are making anyway

 

"The fee is up there with what Everton will need for Gordon who has been a Newcastle target for weeks. But the clubs are well apart on the fee as the Toon are only in at £25 million.

 

Gordon’s camp are still trying to make the move happen and working overtime to find a figure that suits neatly for both sides.

 

Newcastle have also had to look at Jack Harrison as Leeds as an alternative. He could be sold for less than the other two options and they may opt for that."

Yeah this would be one of those transfers where we surely would demand a fee far higher than his market price. His value is only going to increase imo

Edited by foxfanazer
Posted

It’s no good saying he “isn’t worth more than £50m”. The fact is he’s worth more than that to us, and we set the price, so there isn’t a discussion to be had.

 

For what it’s worth I think he’s integral to our team, and I love seeing a homegrown boy tearing it up in the PL.

  • Like 4
Posted
21 minutes ago, Lcfc82 said:

I’d sooner us keep him and not sign anyone this summer.

As others have said he’s one of a small group of players who should not be sold at any cost.

This and if wages and squad size are the issue not actial finds for transfers, we should keep hold of the cash and accept the rebuild is gonna happen in 12 months time when several players have walked for nothing.

Guest Col city fan
Posted
1 hour ago, foxfanazer said:

Yeah this would be one of those transfers where we surely would demand a fee far higher than his market price. His value is only going to increase imo

All depends doesn’t it.

If we see more of the rampaging, incisive Barnes and not the ‘you don’t even knows he’s on the pitch’ Barnes then your’e probs correct.

But look back through the match threads of last season. There were more of the latter for good periods of time. He even got dropped a few times.

As usual, just being honest.

Guest Col city fan
Posted
1 hour ago, ClaphamFox said:

If Barnes leaves, we are guaranteed to be weaker in that position. The same can be said of Maddison and Fofana. Selling any of them weakens us.

That’s how to look at it for sure

 

Guest Col city fan
Posted
1 hour ago, Devonfox1884 said:

It’s no good saying he “isn’t worth more than £50m”. The fact is he’s worth more than that to us, and we set the price, so there isn’t a discussion to be had.

 

For what it’s worth I think he’s integral to our team, and I love seeing a homegrown boy tearing it up in the PL.

Of course it’s worth saying.

IF we are looking to sell, a player is only worth what someone is willing to pay. 
Look at the table I put up earlier. There were real class players on it like Gravenberch who Bayern have got for an absolute steal.

Of course, if Barnes isn’t for sale, its all academic 

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

All depends doesn’t it.

If we see more of the rampaging, incisive Barnes and not the ‘you don’t even knows he’s on the pitch’ Barnes then your’e probs correct.

But look back through the match threads of last season. There were more of the latter for good periods of time. He even got dropped a few times.

As usual, just being honest.

I'll never use Foxestalk match threads as a good indicator of player value Col :thumbup: lol

 

I get your point but there's absolutely no chance of us getting anything close to Barnes for that kind of money. 

Edited by foxfanazer
Guest Dirkster the Fox
Posted

Personally I'd be gutted if he was sold.

 

1) Local lad

 

2) Just about makes our boring possession football worth the wait for his bursting runs.

 

The reality is paying punters need entertainment and he gives us this.

Posted

Christ, we havent replaced the last great winger we had for 5 years. How long would it take to replace Barnes if we sold him lol

 

Feels like he is going to have a great season.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

All depends doesn’t it.

If we see more of the rampaging, incisive Barnes and not the ‘you don’t even knows he’s on the pitch’ Barnes then your’e probs correct.

But look back through the match threads of last season. There were more of the latter for good periods of time. He even got dropped a few times.

As usual, just being honest.

Even in his quiet games you notice how much he stretches a game compared to when he's not playing. He's improved on his end product but we all know there's room for him to improve further. If he did he'd be virtually unplayable 

Posted
1 minute ago, lgfualol said:

Christ, we havent replaced the last great winger we had for 5 years. How long would it take to replace Barnes if we sold him lol

 

Feels like he is going to have a great season.

Said the same mate. One of the very few exciting players we have

Posted
6 minutes ago, Dirkster the Fox said:

Personally I'd be gutted if he was sold.

 

1) Local lad

 

2) Just about makes our boring possession football worth the wait for his bursting runs.

 

The reality is paying punters need entertainment and he gives us this.

Plus lots of goals!

Posted
11 minutes ago, Col city fan said:

That’s how to look at it for sure

 

We don't need money. We need squad space. There is no need to sell starting players for cash, unless they are pushing for a move.

 

We need squad space for better players: Selling Barnes, and having to replace him, solves exactly 0 issues.

  • Like 3
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...