Defeat at forest surely his times up

[Thebluefox85]

Just now, Raj said:

What you mean the one titled "Brendan Rodgers " with 1784 pages in it?

Hard to miss tbf

Exactly should of been should deleted ****ing ages ago far too big dates back over 3 years all ridiculous and pointless crap on it with no specific topic! Like I said to the last clown don’t comment and stick to your “related” Brendan Rodgers chat if this is all you have to moan about in your Empty little life, maybe you need to get out abit more ffs!! 

[TJQuik]

Make a pointless thread. Start insulting anyone who points out that it's pointless. Then accuses them of having no life 😂

[StanSP]

3 minutes ago, Thebluefox85 said:

Exactly should of been should deleted ****ing ages ago far too big dates back over 3 years all ridiculous and pointless crap on it with no specific topic! Like I said to the last clown don’t comment and stick to your “related” Brendan Rodgers chat if this is all you have to moan about in your Empty little life, maybe you need to get out abit more ffs!! 

It's literally discussed all the time whether he should go and why the board haven't acted yet

 

 

[Thebluefox85]

Just now, TJQuik said:

Make a pointless thread. Start insulting anyone who points out that it's pointless. Then accuses them of having no life 😂

Not insulting anyone I don’t see a problem with starting a thread on a forum just because a few people on here have huge ocd problems and feel the need to comment on it then moan it’s not in a brendan Rodgers specific chat I mean seriously didn’t realise it could trigger people so much 🤣🤣

[phoneticerror]

16 minutes ago, Thebluefox85 said:

Exactly should have been should deleted ****ing ages ago far too big dates back over 3 years all ridiculous and pointless crap on it with no specific topic! Like I said to the last clown don’t comment and stick to your “related” Brendan Rodgers chat if this is all you have to moan about in your Empty little life, maybe you need to get out abit more ffs!! 

Has anybody ever seen @Thebluefox85 and @1884Manin the same room? 🤔

 

Both seem to start topics that already exist and moan about threads being too old, even if they date back just one year. Fail to see how multiple threads is better than one.

 

Quit getting so sensitive.

[Stevosevic]

He’s not getting sacked lads. 

[Lineker's Left Foot]

Just now, Stevosevic said:

He’s not getting sacked lads. 

Hit man incoming then.. hopefully 

[Spudulike]

I refuse to comment on this until the correct name for that club is used in the title. 

 

Whoever starts the match thread can they name it properly as Notts Forrest please. Cheers 

[Guest]

39 minutes ago, Thebluefox85 said:

Like I said to the last clown don’t comment and stick to your “related” Brendan Rodgers chat if this is all you have to moan about in your Empty little life, maybe you need to get out abit more ffs!! 

 

34 minutes ago, Thebluefox85 said:

Not insulting anyone 🤣🤣

[An Away Move]

I’ve done a 180 on Rodgers. Not because I like him. I don’t warm to him and was fervently Rodger’s out - it’s just that we are going to have a rebuild very soon and I think I’d prefer to have him for that rather than have a brand new manager who doesn’t have the organisational knowledge of Leicester that Rodgers has built up. He knows the club and personnel inside out right through to youth level. I’ve heard how good at his job he is with the young ones from an insider. As painful as it is to watch us right now and as tempting as it is to sack him to get a bounce I think it could well backfire. For that reason I think even those of us who don’t really like him should back him from now through to the next season and then see where we are. 

Edited 8 January 2023 by An Away Move
Spelling

[somebum]

No chance the bloke has cast a spell on Top, who turns out to be a bottom, it seems

[Dames]

We can't afford to sack him, its really that simple. 

[Out Foxed]

if we do go down it will probably come down to the last few games of the season - for the drama and media narratives they can push. interesting that we have West Ham one the last day. 

[Happy Fox]

7 minutes ago, An Away Move said:

I’ve done a 180 on Rodgers. Not because I like him. I don’t warm to him and was fervently Rodger’s out - it’s just that we are going to have a rebuild very soon and I think I’d prefer to have him for that rather than have a brand new manager who doesn’t have the organisational knowledge of Leicester that Rodgers has built up. He knows the club and personnel inside out right through to youth level. I’ve heard how good at his job he is with the young ones from an insider. As painful as it is to watch us right now and as tempting as it is to sack him to get a bounce I think it could well backfire. For that reason I think even those of us who don’t really like him should back him from now through to the next season and then see where we are. 

It’s best for both parties if we move on, we aren’t going to hit the heights of European football for a while, and Rodgers probably wants to manage in his eyes a bigger club. 

Edited 8 January 2023 by Happy Fox

[volpeazzurro]

5 minutes ago, An Away Move said:

I’ve done a 180 on Rodgers. Not because I like him. I don’t warm to him and was fervently Rodger’s out - it’s just that we are going to have a rebuild very soon and I think I’d prefer to have him for that rather than have a brand new manager who doesn’t have the organisational knowledge of Leicester that Rodgers has built up. He knows the club and personnel inside out right through to youth level. I’ve heard how good at his job he is with the young ones from an insider. As painful as it is to watch us right now and as tempting as it is to sack him to get a bounce I think it could well backfire. For that reason I think even those of us who don’t really like him should back him from now through to the next season and then see where we are. 

Rodgers has organisational knowledge of Leicester that he's built up?

Surely that's the whole crux of the problem, it needs dismantling asap! His finger in every pie approach has been a total disaster, likewise his feet under the table approach at previous clubs started a downward spiral there too.

[SemperEadem]

It won’t happen. Can’t afford it and the powers at the club love him.

[cruzFOX]

We gotta stop stressing about Rogers getting sacked or not. The only people who have the power to determine his outcome are the board and Top. We will never even know before it happens unlike other clubs. Our boardroom is as tight as a frogs ass.

for now it seems we keep calm and carry on as the saying goes

[Walshy5]

The way I see it is Top has 2 choices. Sack him or get relegated. I know which I'd rather do.

[Beachyboy]

3 hours ago, Lineker's Left Foot said:

Hit man incoming then.. hopefully 

I don't think we need to go that far, just get Rogers to participate in two or three of the training sessions, that should incapacitate him for a couple months like half our squad.

[Tielemans63]

I think he could expose himself in the pre-match press conference, name only 9 players to take on Forest, molest a ball boy during the game, lose 6-0, shit on and then burn a Thailand flag at full time and he'd still be Leicester manager for the Brighton game.

Edited 8 January 2023 by Tielemans63

[CrazyKopCorner]

No he won’t be sacked even after another 4-1 drumming. It has the feel of a very uncomfortable marriage LCFC and Brendan - both would prefer someone \ something new but neither can afford to move on