Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Trev3939

Daniel Iversen

By Trev3939, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Mike1983

Mike1983

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
8 minutes ago, themightyfin said:

If only BR had not been so stubborn for so long and kept in Ward we would not be in this position now. 

No sane manager would have stood on the sideline watching Ward's performances for the first 5-6 games and still continue to start him.

  • Like 8
FoxTimmy2

FoxTimmy2

Posted
Posted

Distribution still quite shite, but he secured us the 3 points today.

 

I honestly think the club should move Smithies up as our number two. We cannot afford to take the risk of relying on Ward in that role any longer.

Foxy DK

Foxy DK

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, StanSP said:

Top quality save from Neves at the end. Didn't have any other save to make (partly thanks to Soyuncu in front of him). 

 

 

Usually helps the defense to known they play in front of a competent goalie as well 

  • Like 1
Guest nathan.

Guest nathan.

Posted
Posted

Solid.

 

When you do not really notice a keeper performance means they have been solid. 

inckley fox

inckley fox

Posted
Posted
On 17/04/2023 at 16:44, Chelmofox said:

No hindsight at all from me. Ward should not have played the Brentford game in August as he wasn't fit and Iversen had done most of preseason (with Kasper for most of it ffs!). Brendan picking ward showed crazy favoritism and it was clear early on there were problems. By the time we got the Brighton game in September it was clear we had serious issues at the back. Its madness to consider how long it took to change it.

Completely. It seemed bonkers to me at the time. And for Rodgers not to hastily reevaluate was negligence.

  • Popular Post
funkyrobot

funkyrobot

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
35 minutes ago, themightyfin said:

If only BR had not been so stubborn for so long and kept in Ward we would not be in this position now. 

If we do get relegated, the two Rodgers decisions that will have directly caused it are the selection of Danny Ward and the non-selection of Caglar Soyuncu. It’s not unreasonable to suggest that we’d be at least 10 points better off if Iversen and Soyuncu had played from the start of the season. 

  • Like 9
Devonfox1884

Devonfox1884

Posted
Posted

I like him. Not sure he’s the long term solution as a no.1, but he’s at least added a trustworthy presence in goal for us. Good save from the free kick, though in honesty I’d expect any decent keeper to make it - which means Ward probably wouldn’t have!

  • Haha 1
baldeagle

baldeagle

Posted
Posted

Good save from the free kick if that was Ward it would have been a certain goal and 2 points lost . That said his distribution is woeful  . I seriously can’t recall a single kick reaching its desired target .It just kept inviting pressure on to us  giving possession back to Wolves , even the commentators picked up on it . . If he can work on it then he’ll be fine if he can’t then we need s new keeper. 

Mint23

Mint23

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, themightyfin said:

If only BR had not been so stubborn for so long and kept in Ward we would not be in this position now. 

The other thing BR could have done is play our best defender in front of Ward to protect him instead of bombscare Amartey!

  • Like 2
ARTY_FOX

ARTY_FOX

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Lionator said:

Kicking is frustrating but the fact he can keep the ball out of the net is far more important. 

Tbf kasper kicked it out for a throw in 9/10 why the commentators would say every single game it was unlike him. But he stopped shots and my god have I missed that. 

Edited by ARTY_FOX
Jimmy

Jimmy

Posted
Posted

when Wilf is on the field and we have a goal kick push him right up as a target man and put the goal kicks right up the middle, asking him to hit the wingers means he needs to be pinpoint, play the percentages

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...