Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Trev3939

Daniel Iversen

By Trev3939, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, Tielemans63 said:

This guy was the difference between 1 point and 3 today. Thought his kicking looked slightly improved today too

 

 

 

eh, kept aiming for Patson who lets be honest is the least likely player to win a header when Mendy isn't on the pitch 

GingerrrFox

GingerrrFox

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, The Doctor said:

eh, kept aiming for Patson who lets be honest is the least likely player to win a header when Mendy isn't on the pitch 

Daka was winning his fair share of headers against Semedo, the problem was Iversen struggled with his accuracy and often hit it too long. 

eblair

eblair

Posted
Posted

we just need to work out his kicking, we are too far in season for that atm so looks pretty bad

 

with a proper pre season where he can assert dominance over his back 4, he is a prem goalkeeper

 

nick pope has poor feet but newcastle are flying

filbertway

filbertway

Posted
Posted

All the doubters have is that the keepers not Pirlo. Loving it! Go on Danny! Breandan choosing Ward is genuinely up there with the most inept, brain dead, awful decision making ever made by anyone in the world.

  • Like 1
Tom12345

Tom12345

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, GingerrrFox said:

Daka was winning his fair share of headers against Semedo, the problem was Iversen struggled with his accuracy and often hit it too long. 

He kept hitting it way over to the left side and went out of bounds a few times. If he can’t control his kicks, not sure why he cannot compensate that by starting his run up a bit more angled to the left of the ball instead of straight behind the ball so that it will end up going to the middle of the park. Just needs some training?

eblair

eblair

Posted
Posted

think back to the game against stockport we won on pens; if you watch his saves back he on the eye is so clearly better than ward

 

he makes those pen saves look easy, like he made that neves save

 

the fact the change did not come then has cost Brendan his job and might cost us a lot

  • Like 1
hejammy

hejammy

Posted
Posted

It's quite simple why BR preferred Ward. Simply because Ward is better with his feet, BR loves possession football. He wanted a keeper who would be able to pass the ball. His downfall was that he should have realised that a keeper actually having the ability to make a save is far more important. Again his stubbornness personified! 

  • Like 1
funkyrobot

funkyrobot

Posted
Posted
On 22/04/2023 at 23:04, The Doctor said:

eh, kept aiming for Patson who lets be honest is the least likely player to win a header when Mendy isn't on the pitch 

I actually think Daka is good aerially on the wing. Won lots of them against Wolves and same again tonight. 

BillyFOX12

BillyFOX12

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, SafewayFox said:

Makes Rodgers playing Ward for 26 PL games even more inexcusable.

So so criminal, it's quite ironic that seeing Iversen perform infuriates me more than seeing Ward's circus acts.

  • Like 2
Big Dave

Big Dave

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, funkyrobot said:

I actually think Daka is good aerially on the wing. Won lots of them against Wolves and same again tonight. 

He was doggo against Wolves.

Looked ok tonight though TBF.

Lionator

Lionator

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Claridge said:

Poor for the goal, very slow to get across, great save at the end

Even if he gets across, the header is near perfect. There’s at least 3 others who could’ve done more there to stop the goal than Iversen. 

Big Dave

Big Dave

Posted
Posted

Iversen was great tonight.

not at fault for the goal.

made some decent saves and his positioning was very good, coming off of his line very quickly

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...