Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

@Mickyblueeyes Poor form posting a mysterious hint about an incoming transfer in here...

 

This thread is gonna get 'hotter' than it already is and everyone is gonna get excited thinking (wrongly) that we've binned him off lol

  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

Incoming tonight, postive news on incoming transfer business from Percy. 

How vague can he get lol lol

 

Such a nothing tweet haha 

Posted
Just now, StanSP said:

How vague can he get lol lol

 

Such a nothing tweet haha 

Percy's last tweet was about Cunha? Unless I'm missing something?

Posted

Ok I didnt think that through, that was me being sarcastic that as we have had some "bad" news on the transfer front, the usual process is for the club to release some positive news later. 

 

Sorry!! I have no idea. 

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Club's seen the Édouard tweet and got on the phone to him for some firefighting most likely.

Remember last window when the news of Kristansen broke just as January started ?  Still took us 3 weeks to get over the line 

Edited by CosbehFox
Posted
2 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Remember last window when the news of Kristansen broke just as January started ?  Still took us 3 weeks to get over the line 

Yeah, I'm sure there was a similar episode in the summer as well, maybe when we missed out on the Greek lad?

Posted
27 minutes ago, RowlattsFox said:

Considering Ruud doesn't play Bounanotte, is there a chance we send him back to enable him to get someone else in?

 

On the face of it, probably not a bad decision. However, as this is Leicester City so if we do that then BEK gets an ACL against QPR.

Posted

Too much focus on Rudkin now. Everyone's right to bash him, obviously, he's the most inept DoF relative to his club I think quite likely in the world game. But he's kept in place - why?

Posted
4 minutes ago, Chelmofox said:

On the face of it, probably not a bad decision. However, as this is Leicester City so if we do that then BEK gets an ACL against QPR.

But Buonanotte does play. It'd be absolutely foolish to send him back now. 

  • Like 1
Posted

He's played about 25 mins of PL football for us. I remember he looked really poor against Walsall. 

 

Has he been injured and just struggling for any fitness?

Posted
46 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

https://www.spotrac.com/epl/crystal-palace/cap/_/year/2023

 

Every source I can find says £90k per week. I dont know if we are paying all his wages or not.

 

Edit: foxesofleicester.co.uk says we are paying 100%. Dont know if they are reliable or not.

https://foxesofleicester.com/posts/who-highest-paid-player-leicester-city#:~:text=Winks is comfortable with the,and he earns no bonuses.

Is it any wonder we're in trouble if this is true. 

 

Someone clearly had Rudkins trousers down and not for the first time it seems with the amount of shit we signed recently.

 

How inept does someone have to be before the Clubs take action.

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, StanSP said:

But Buonanotte does play. It'd be absolutely foolish to send him back now. 

yeah yeah - i know. But if getting rid of Buonanotte meant getting a sh1t hot right back on loan then it might actually be worth it as he and BEK are very similar for us. But don't get me wrong, don't want to see Buonanotte sent back.

Posted
Just now, Chelmofox said:

yeah yeah - i know. But if getting rid of Buonanotte meant getting a sh1t hot right back on loan then it might actually be worth it as he and BEK are very similar for us. But don't get me wrong, don't want to see Buonanotte sent back.

I see! We're not getting a shit hot RB though. Rudkin/Glover doesn't have it within him! 

  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

Why’s this Plonker still here? 

Haven't you heard.... apparently there's no clause in his contract that Leicester can terminate his contract and send him back in January. 

Only way is if Palace want him back, but it's being said they don't want him as Leicester have paid a full seasons signing on loan fee

Posted
41 minutes ago, CrispinLA in Texas said:

Haven't you heard.... apparently there's no clause in his contract that Leicester can terminate his contract and send him back in January. 

Only way is if Palace want him back, but it's being said they don't want him as Leicester have paid a full seasons signing on loan fee

We could take the hit and simply de register him and so release a.loan squad place.

 

Another Rudkin **** up obvs,.but what's another 90k a week flushed down the karsi compared with the wasted tens, if not hundreds, of millions he's racked up so far?

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Finnegan said:

Illustrates how over reliant we are on the manager to dictate transfer philosophy.

We're desperate for a sporting director.

100%

Trouble is you need a lot of faith in a sporting director given the idea is they're here for theoretically a longer term than the managers.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...