Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
moore_94

Loans 2025/26

By moore_94, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

LCFCJohn

LCFCJohn

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

We’re gonna regret giving them the option to buy aren’t we 🤣🥲

We will probably regret not getting more.

 

Some options don’t mean others clubs couldn’t come in and offer more though. What if a more attractive offer was made to him?

Scotch

Scotch

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, lcfc sheff said:

We’re gonna regret giving them the option to buy aren’t we 🤣🥲

It's not an option. It is an obligation and good riddance. He's a good player with the potential to be a VERY good player but he (along with the rest of the team) didn't do enough in the PL, which saw us relegated. Where he didn't want to play and get us back. I don't want players like that in the team. 

  • Like 4
honeybradger

honeybradger

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Scotch said:

It's not an option. It is an obligation and good riddance. He's a good player with the potential to be a VERY good player but he (along with the rest of the team) didn't do enough in the PL, which saw us relegated. Where he didn't want to play and get us back. I don't want players like that in the team. 

Let's be fair if the rest of them were as good as him we would have stayed up.

 

The fact that he played to a decent level after spending the season playing with Ayew and Reid on the wings is around as much as you can expect from any talent, only truly world class players like De Bruyne would have produced any output in that team.

  • Like 1
moore_94

moore_94

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Todays Results - Sunday 5th October

 

Bundesliga:

 

Bilal El Khannouss (8.1 + 1 goal + 1 yellow card - 90 mins) - Stuttgart 1-0 FC Heidenheim

 

Scottish Prem:

 

Henry Cartwright (7.1 + 1 goal - 21 mins) - Falkirk 1-1 Rangers

  • Like 3
JimJams

JimJams

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Spudulike said:

Could Rennes accept a higher bid from another club or JJ force a move elsewhere?

Don't think so.  Pretty sure "option" just means we have already agreed terms with the club and player and it's up to us to decide if we take up said option while they're obligated to sell/sign.  Otherwise an "option" is just a redundant addition.  If the other parties can just do what they like we have no more an "option" than any other club.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
lcfc sheff

lcfc sheff

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Scotch said:

It's not an option. It is an obligation and good riddance. He's a good player with the potential to be a VERY good player but he (along with the rest of the team) didn't do enough in the PL, which saw us relegated. Where he didn't want to play and get us back. I don't want players like that in the team. 

I’m not bothered about keeping him mate, I personally didn’t like the lack of end product we witnessed.  I just meant the potential money! 

jbflcfc

jbflcfc

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, JimJams said:

Don't think so.  Pretty sure "option" just means we have already agreed terms with the club and player and it's up to us to decide if we take up said option while they're obligated to sell/sign.  Otherwise an "option" is just a redundant addition.  If the other parties can just do what they like we have no more an "option" than any other club.

Didnt JJ say something along the lines of he & his dad have always seen himself at a team like us in his first interview or have i made this up?

funkyrobot

funkyrobot

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, UniFox21 said:

El Khannous scores again for Stuttgart 

A combination of playing in a better team and the Bundesliga not being at the same level as the Premier League is defo working for ELK

Shane

Shane

Posted
Posted

Maybe Cartwright can push for the first team squad next season with contracts expiring and Skipp surplus to requirements (hopefully). 

Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Wasyls Pec Deck said:

And he’s got Russell Martin the chop! 

I wouldn’t consider that a good thing, if marti so much as has a Cambodian take away, he will end up as our boss. After 3 weeks of trying to woo potter of course 

Edited by Lambert09
  • Haha 1
dmayne7

dmayne7

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, JimJams said:

Don't think so.  Pretty sure "option" just means we have already agreed terms with the club and player and it's up to us to decide if we take up said option while they're obligated to sell/sign.  Otherwise an "option" is just a redundant addition.  If the other parties can just do what they like we have no more an "option" than any other club.

Generally speaking, there is not an agreed contract. Think of it like a release clause. The option price is set at £5m let's say, which means that Rennes have to accept a bid of that value or more from us, but could reject it from another club. However, we still have to agree the terms with James and he could turn us down. Rennes could even offer him a new deal if they wanted. So we would obviously have had that conversation with him, and it is possible that we've soft agreed a contract with him if we're promoted but nothing legally binding. 

 

Fatawu was a deal that had an obligation to buy (thought of course depended on us being promoter), same as BEK to Stuttgart (which has no conditional causes for that to take effect as far as we're aware). In these cases, the contract is agreed with the player as part of the loan and is considered legally binding, being enacted as soon as the transfer is completed.

 

Now I guess you could also have a deal where you agree terms with the player and make that binding then decide whether you want to confirm the deal but I think that's a bit trickier from an employment rights point of view as the transfer is not legally binding/does not come into force if set conditions are met, but only if the buying party wants to do the deal at that time. It's also a bit of a halfway house because it's neither one nor the other. First option to buy (as it should be called rather than just an option) incentivises teams to take a punt on a player, pay a higher loan fee up front or potentially less as a buyer and also gives the parent club the chance to still keep the player if they do well and can better a contract being offered elsewhere. Obligations allow teams to have the security of a deal done with the flexibility of accounting periods/cashflow/registration rules etc.

 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...