JimJams Posted 16 August 2025 Posted 16 August 2025 3 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said: If Leeds offer a straight swap with Sam Greenwood…would people take it? Not a fxxking chance for me. I'd rather play JJ up front!
Muzzy_no7 Posted 16 August 2025 Posted 16 August 2025 (edited) 8 minutes ago, JimJams said: Not a fxxking chance for me. I'd rather play JJ up front! OK. How about Bamford? Or Brendan Aaronson? Edited 16 August 2025 by Muzzy_no7
JimJams Posted 16 August 2025 Posted 16 August 2025 Ok Muzzy, now I know you're on a windup! I suppose though, to entertain the idea, it all depends what the actual fee would be for JJ. If it's the £9mill that's been touted in the rumour mill then I wouldn't take a single one of them because none of them are worth anywhere near that and I'd rather we had the money to spend (in theory!). If Leeds aren't really interested for that money and you're looking at half that kind of figure then Aaronson simply for the value proposition. But I don't think I'd want any of the players they'd let go of.
Muzzy_no7 Posted 16 August 2025 Posted 16 August 2025 Just now, JimJams said: Ok Muzzy, now I know you're on a windup! I suppose though, to entertain the idea, it all depends what the actual fee would be for JJ. If it's the £9mill that's been touted in the rumour mill then I wouldn't take a single one of them because none of them are worth anywhere near that and I'd rather we had the money to spend (in theory!). If Leeds aren't really interested for that money and you're looking at half that kind of figure then Aaronson simply for the value proposition. But I don't think I'd want any of the players they'd let go of. I just can’t see us getting money for him 1
moore_94 Posted 16 August 2025 Posted 16 August 2025 1 hour ago, Muzzy_no7 said: OK. How about Bamford? Or Brendan Aaronson? Take a lesser fee and they can just have JJ
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 16 August 2025 Posted 16 August 2025 If this is a move likely to happen, IF... Why the hell are we playing him? It's sheer stupidity and if he's injured it would sum out club up right now 1
urban fox Posted 17 August 2025 Posted 17 August 2025 He played because, unless there is a firm offer on the table, not just journalists speculation, he is being paid by us to play. The speculation comes to nothing we have left him out for no reason. If we are trying to sell then it is a shop window exercise 1
Claudio Fannieri Posted 17 August 2025 Posted 17 August 2025 I also think we are playing some of these to leverage the best possible price from interested parties. In this case it may well have backfired massively. 1
Kierzz Posted 17 August 2025 Posted 17 August 2025 He is the quarter of the player that Ricky P. Hopefully, we can keep him fit again this season like last time in the Championship and sell Justin
Popular Post Mapperleyfox Posted 17 August 2025 Popular Post Posted 17 August 2025 Justin is utter dogshit - a liability. I'd take any fee for him 8
ithuriel Posted 17 August 2025 Posted 17 August 2025 41 minutes ago, Mapperleyfox said: Justin is utter dogshit - a liability. I'd take any fee for him Club should put him on Ebay, maybe do the same to Soumare and class him as a hat stand.
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 17 August 2025 Posted 17 August 2025 17 hours ago, Muzzy_no7 said: OK. How about Bamford? Or Brendan Aaronson? Brendan Aaronson would actually work in this system with Bilal playing deeper to receive the ball as the number “8”. Would require a bully in the base of the midfield though who’s comfortable receiving the ball.
volpeazzurro Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 On 16/08/2025 at 19:30, Muzzy_no7 said: I just can’t see us getting money for him Me neither, he’s bloody useless 😂
Popular Post Lambert09 Posted 18 August 2025 Popular Post Posted 18 August 2025 Deal supposedly in doubt due to the injury 5
Lesta Legend Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 We're the architect of our own downfall constantly. Imagine if the fund we could have got for him means we've got to sell both Fats and Bilal or we can spend anything prior to the closure of the window. Unless the talk of this being advanced was BS, then it makes no sense why he was included. 1
hackneyfox Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 1 hour ago, Lesta Legend said: We're the architect of our own downfall constantly. Imagine if the fund we could have got for him means we've got to sell both Fats and Bilal or we can spend anything prior to the closure of the window. Unless the talk of this being advanced was BS, then it makes no sense why he was included. Ricardo is injured, as was VK. Perhaps we thought it was an idea to play him and try and get 3 points. 1
The Fosse Way Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 11 minutes ago, hackneyfox said: Ricardo is injured, as was VK. Perhaps we thought it was an idea to play him and try and get 3 points. If he was remotely close to a move then in the club’s current financial situation, jeopardising receiving millions of pounds in almost pure PSR profit to play a full-back in one game (in which he was poor and then got injured) might be an idea but it’s not a good idea.
DezFox Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 26 minutes ago, hackneyfox said: Ricardo is injured, as was VK. Perhaps we thought it was an idea to play him and try and get 3 points. If you wanted to get 3 points why would you play him 1 2
DezFox Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 2 hours ago, Lambert09 said: Deal supposedly in doubt due to the injury Shock, injury stops us removing deadwood. Hate this club
Lesta Legend Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 16 minutes ago, hackneyfox said: Ricardo is injured, as was VK. Perhaps we thought it was an idea to play him and try and get 3 points. I’m the scheme of things the idea of prioritising 3 points after two games to millions of pounds of income helping us to presumably meet PSR or invest into the rest of the squad seems a little weird. Aluko would have been fine.
F T Fagos Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 2 hours ago, Lesta Legend said: We're the architect of our own downfall constantly. Imagine if the fund we could have got for him means we've got to sell both Fats and Bilal or we can spend anything prior to the closure of the window. Unless the talk of this being advanced was BS, then it makes no sense why he was included. Am I missing something here? I can't see how missing out on a fee for him would mean us having to sell both Fatawu and Bilal .
Muzzy_no7 Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 2 hours ago, Lambert09 said: Deal supposedly in doubt due to the injury F’ing joke if indeed a deal was on the cards
ronnup Posted 18 August 2025 Posted 18 August 2025 Did someone send them that video of him being at fault for 15 goals or whatever it was!?
Recommended Posts
Posted by DZ-LCFC,
Leeds 10m fee agreed.
Recommended by Finnegan
9 reactions
Go to this post