Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

If Leeds offer a straight swap with Sam Greenwood…would people take it?

Not a fxxking chance for me.  

I'd rather play JJ up front!

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, JimJams said:

Not a fxxking chance for me.  

I'd rather play JJ up front!

OK.

 

How about Bamford? 
 

Or Brendan Aaronson?

Edited by Muzzy_no7
Posted

Ok Muzzy, now I know you're on a windup!

 

I suppose though, to entertain the idea, it all depends what the actual fee would be for JJ.  If it's the £9mill that's been touted in the rumour mill then I wouldn't take a single one of them because none of them are worth anywhere near that and I'd rather we had the money to spend (in theory!).

 

If Leeds aren't really interested for that money and you're looking at half that kind of figure then Aaronson simply for the value proposition.  But I don't think I'd want any of the players they'd let go of.

Posted
Just now, JimJams said:

Ok Muzzy, now I know you're on a windup!

 

I suppose though, to entertain the idea, it all depends what the actual fee would be for JJ.  If it's the £9mill that's been touted in the rumour mill then I wouldn't take a single one of them because none of them are worth anywhere near that and I'd rather we had the money to spend (in theory!).

 

If Leeds aren't really interested for that money and you're looking at half that kind of figure then Aaronson simply for the value proposition.  But I don't think I'd want any of the players they'd let go of.

I just can’t see us getting money for him 

  • Haha 1
Posted

He played because, unless there is a firm offer on the table,  not just journalists speculation, he is being paid by us to play. The speculation comes to nothing we have left him out for no reason. If we are trying to sell then it is a shop window exercise

  • Like 1
Posted

He is the quarter of the player that Ricky P.

 

Hopefully, we can keep him fit again this season like last time in the Championship and sell Justin

Posted
41 minutes ago, Mapperleyfox said:

Justin is utter dogshit - a liability. I'd take any fee for him

Club should put him on Ebay, maybe do the same to Soumare and class him as a hat stand.

Posted
17 hours ago, Muzzy_no7 said:

OK.

 

How about Bamford? 
 

Or Brendan Aaronson?

Brendan Aaronson would actually work in this system with Bilal playing deeper to receive the ball as the number “8”.


Would require a bully in the base of the midfield though who’s comfortable receiving the ball.

Posted

We're the architect of our own downfall constantly. Imagine if the fund we could have got for him means we've got to sell both Fats and Bilal or we can spend anything prior to the closure of the window. Unless the talk of this being advanced was BS, then it makes no sense why he was included. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Lesta Legend said:

We're the architect of our own downfall constantly. Imagine if the fund we could have got for him means we've got to sell both Fats and Bilal or we can spend anything prior to the closure of the window. Unless the talk of this being advanced was BS, then it makes no sense why he was included. 

Ricardo is injured, as was VK. Perhaps we thought it was an idea to play him and try and get 3 points.

  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, hackneyfox said:

Ricardo is injured, as was VK. Perhaps we thought it was an idea to play him and try and get 3 points.

If he was remotely close to a move then in the club’s current financial situation, jeopardising receiving millions of pounds in almost pure PSR profit to play a full-back in one game (in which he was poor and then got injured) might be an idea but it’s not a good idea.

Posted
26 minutes ago, hackneyfox said:

Ricardo is injured, as was VK. Perhaps we thought it was an idea to play him and try and get 3 points.

If you wanted to get 3 points why would you play him 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, hackneyfox said:

Ricardo is injured, as was VK. Perhaps we thought it was an idea to play him and try and get 3 points.

I’m the scheme of things the idea of prioritising 3 points after two games to millions of pounds of income helping us to presumably meet PSR or invest into the rest of the squad seems a little weird. Aluko would have been fine. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Lesta Legend said:

We're the architect of our own downfall constantly. Imagine if the fund we could have got for him means we've got to sell both Fats and Bilal or we can spend anything prior to the closure of the window. Unless the talk of this being advanced was BS, then it makes no sense why he was included. 

Am I missing something here? I can't see how missing out on a fee for him would mean us having to sell both Fatawu and Bilal .

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...