Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

They must read Foxestalk and sit around and discuss “what could wind them up the most” then release a statement like today? I don’t think it could of gone much better from their point of view

Ben Nelson club captain up next just especially for you mate lol lol 

Edited by Rubbersoul
Posted
51 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

I’m don’t know the guy but he must talk a good game to go from FC to CEO in a handful of years - he could be really good before I slate him but this is Leicester City we’re talking about. 
 

Yes a lot of CFOs will transition into CEO roles but they tend to be the more commercially astute ones. I’m staggered they haven’t gone with someone external, as for the Rudkin role it’s a joke at this point and it’s now 100% concrete he isn’t going anywhere. 
 

if they wanted to appoint the FD its lazy to say they are now recruiting a new one, seems another afterthought - I’ll try and find who the recruiter is and may have a stab myself. 

It will be a headhunter mate.  Your best bet is to call Wasserman and ask them to send your details in 🤣🤣 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Just imagine the lift in the fan base if Top had the balls and replaced Rudkin in this announcement. 

 

I think the stadium would be full and new enthusiasm would come in. Not saying it'll save our season, but it might lift part of the mood. 

 

This doesn't help one bit

Posted
1 hour ago, Gazza M said:

Shit sticks to shit. We need administration to get them all gone. 

Unfortunatley.......i think you are right!

Posted

Jon Rudkin responsible for strategic squad development 😂.

I’ve seen his squad development strategy - fill it with over paid, over rated gutless characters who will be impossible to sell, on ridiculously long contracts whilst using the loan market to trial centre forwards without them troubling the starting line up but jogging round Seagrave for months. 
 

The only way this t**d flushes away now is new owners coming in and reviewing his performance, if this was his review and the outcome is a promotion the owners aren’t fit for purpose in staff structuring.

  • Like 4
Posted
10 minutes ago, MattFox said:

KPFC position has always been that it’s Rudkin that’s the problem 

 

How’s that holding up now

It'll be the protestors.

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, SK3Blue said:

Rowett must be breathing a sigh of relief that he’s only got 11 more matches with these assholes. 

Trouble is I think Top believes he’s doing a good job. He does not understand he’s crap

Posted
3 hours ago, Danizen said:

What's the difference between a Chief Football Officer and a Chief Sporting Director? 

A typical breakdown of the roles 

 

Chairman – Khun “Top” Srivaddhanaprabha
•    Sets overall vision and strategy for the club and signs off on major decisions (senior appointments, big transfers, major investments).
•    Chairs the board, represents the owners, and is the ultimate decision-maker above both the CEO and Chief Football Officer.

CEO (Business) – Kevin Davies
•    Leads all corporate affairs: finances, budgets, commercial deals, stadium/venue operations, retail, HR, legal, and administration.
•    Responsible for financial sustainability (PSR/FFP compliance), overall business strategy, and aligning all non-football departments behind the club’s long-term plan.

 

Chief Football Officer – Jon Rudkin
•    Overall charge of all football activities: men’s, women’s, and pathways/academy, sitting above the Sporting Director and football departments.
•    Sets high-level football strategy and governance, liaises with the board on football matters, and line-manages the Sporting Director.

 

Sporting Director – James McCarron
•    Runs day-to-day football operations on the men’s side: performance and player trading.
•    Leads recruitment and squad building: scouting profiles, transfers in and out, loans, and contract renewals, aligned to a clear playing identity and long-term plan.
•    Works with the head coach and academy so first team, B team and youth pathway all fit one football philosophy.

 

Interim Managing Director – Kamonthip Netthanomsak
•    Acts as an executive link between the chairman and club operations during the transition, helping implement the new structure.
•    Oversees and coordinates business/operational departments alongside the CEO role, making sure day-to-day running matches the board’s direction.

 

Commercial Director – Russell Jones
•    Responsible for revenue-generating activities: sponsorship, partnerships, ticketing/marketing strategy, retail and brand growth.
•    Reports into the business side (under the CEO), tasked with growing income to support the football budget and long-term sustainability.

  • Like 1
Posted

I might apply for the job as Financial Director. 
 

I’m completely unsuitable for the role, however that doesn’t seem to matter in all honesty.

 

I’d like to think I stand a good chance of landing the job. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

So is that normal then to have two people who seem to have a heavy emphasis on the commercial side of things? And how is that sustainable with the current way  we do things? And how will that change? Unless we make some massive changes, what’s the point?

 

 

some ideas:

 

yearly  pre-season tours of Asia.

winter break tours of Asia

random friendlies in Asia

boxing cards/ concerts held at the stadium

Leicester City themselves start purchasing race horses. ( as ridiculous as this sounds, our owner IS as ridiculous as this sounds)

summer events on Vicky park

Leicester City Lotto

Edited by MPH
Posted

The level of footballing network that our C-suite has is non-existent. Top’s trusted circle keeps only getting smaller. 
 

We’ve gone from having one of the most respected people in the game in Whelan at the table to a bunch of jokers all promoted beyond their capabilities. 
 

What a hideous organisation we’ve become. 

Posted

Rudkin getting a promotion is ridiculous, but sadly predictable.  The club's statement suggests he's going to be in charge of things he's proven to be weak at so I'm not expecting anything to change.

 

The statement itself is also ridiculous, full of corporate bullshit and in denial about the club's current situation with the way it goes on about wanting to be a sustainable Premier League club.  With the way things are going we probably need to prioritise being a sustainable League One club first.

  • Like 1
Posted

To us outsiders certainly looks like Top has promoted 2 from within to be his trusted aides, plus his mate Monika and then the 2 newbies appointed to deflect the criticism have come in as the next layer of management. 
 

Looks to me to be cosmetic changes and actually reaffirms the status quo, I fully expect to see little or no change in how we operate on or off the pitch. Think we will double down on the tippy tappy football and more of the same sponsorships and partnerships with obscure gambling and crypto companies. 

Posted
6 hours ago, StanSP said:

The worst sentence to read:

 

 

Leading the Club’s football operation, Jon Rudkin has been appointed to the role of Chief Football Officer, providing executive leadership of all football matters, ensuring long-term sporting alignment, strategic squad development and the high-performance environment required to deliver sustained competitive success

That made me feel sick. I already have mild anxiety. I'm gonna have to increase my meds.

Posted

https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/leicester-citys-dire-situation-broken-10846158

 

Leicester City's dire situation and broken trust deserved more radical shake-up
Changes have been made at the top of the club, the most significant of King Power's ownership, but they won't be enough to appease those who have already lost faith

Jordan Blackwell
17:01, 03 Mar 2026

It’s certainly a shake-up. James McCarron’s arrival as sporting director marks the most senior appointment from outside the club to Leicester City’s football department since King Power took over.


McCarron’s arrival is recognition that changes were needed, and recognition that Jon Rudkin needed assistance in what is a demanding and difficult job. It is a positive step.


However, there will be a feeling that McCarron’s appointment is both too little and too late.


City are threatened with falling to their lowest ebb, not just under King Power’s ownership, but in their 142-year history.

Jon Rudkin preaches patience in rare statement as he takes on new Leicester City role

 

Because of how far and how quickly they have fallen, if any club required a full-scale reorganisation, it is City. This shake-up does not feel vigorous enough.

 

 

The fans are in a bad mood. Rightly so. They’ve watched their club tumble and there has been little sign of a reversal of fortunes. When supporters are fed up, the instinctive reaction can be pessimistic.

But there are good reasons for them to have doubts. Because, in terms of optics, it looks like Rudkin has received a promotion.

Chairman Aiyawatt ‘Top’ Srivaddhanprabha gave backing to the beleaguered director of football in his interviews in January, and so it is not a surprise that he still has an integral role at the club. But it’s not a good look.


Marti Cifuentes lost his job as manager a month and a half ago because he was not performing to expectations. It was not an unreasonable decision. This is what happens in football when people don’t do their jobs as expected: they lose them.

Rudkin has not performed his tasks to expectation either. If he had, City would not be in the position they are in. He not only remains in a role, but appears to have been handed a more powerful one.

But perhaps not. In moving Rudkin up, there is someone new to take over many of the responsibilities in recruitment, contracts, and managerial appointments where the former director of football has been deemed to have failed.


But McCarron has plenty to prove too. He comes in from the City Football Group, and his long stint there, at one of the game’s most successful footballing conglomerates, suggests reason for excitement and how he may be able to guide the club.

However, he has had a spell as a sporting director, at second-tier Belgian club Lommel, and left there last summer after what the local paper described as an “abysmal performance” in the role.

And in any case, there will still be doubts over his ability to influence City’s philosophy and change their approach when he has to report to Rudkin anyway.


Then, for the new chief executive, City have promoted internally, Kevin Davies stepping up from finance director.

Again, instinctively, it doesn’t feel like a good look, although that’s perhaps a tad unfair in this instance.

City’s financial mismanagement has caused problems that have put them in their current predicament and so it again may seem like someone has failed upwards.


To ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google searches, click here

But really, Davies inherited the club’s financial issues, rather than caused them, and has been fighting to correct City’s course. It was something he was able to do, so much so that they even earned a point back in their recent Profit and Sustainability Rules case.

He will know, because of the recent financial problems, that he is walking into the line of fire and will have plenty of people to win around.


In other circumstances, it would be a great story. This is a Leicester lad born and raised who has worked his way up at his hometown club over 15 years. If City were in a good position, it would be the sort of appointment that would go down well.

But City are not in a good position. They’re in their worst. At this moment, an outside voice to really spark change would have been better.

It’s been five months since Susan Whelan left and there will naturally be question marks as to why a replacement took so long to emerge when it was an internal appointment anyway. It’s not known if City interviewed outside contenders for the job.


The appointment of McCarron, the change of role for Rudkin and the promotion for Davies could all improve the situation at City. Time will tell on that front.

But they are changes that do not improve the fan sentiment, which is ultimately a huge part of the situation at the moment.

The way the club has been run and the lack of success has left fans feeling more disconnected than ever. Falling home attendances are proof of that.


That’s why more radical changes were required. Fans need something to believe in, and they have not been given that.

Neither do the series of statements hit the mark. It’s hard to get on board with messages of hope, of looking to the future and of a sustained Premier League presence when City are in the dire position they are.


The problem is that, once those mistakes are laid out plainly, there will be more questions as to why the man responsible for a substantial number of them looks like he’s been given a promotion.

Rudkin’s call for patience will fall on deaf ears. For many fans, trust is long gone. The only way to have regained some would have been for more sweeping changes that recognised the severity of City’s situation. This restructure, at least optically, does not quite do that.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Just proves the STAGGERING level of incompetence that Top inflicts on us. The bloke is an absolute ****ing idiot.

  • Like 3
Posted
3 hours ago, AjcW said:

The good news is, we're on page 9 and no one has mentioned "Del Boy went on a gap year to south east asia" has been hired as our Commercial Director..... 

god, that on top of the financial director who's presided over several years of FFP failure as CEO and the DoF who's lead us from European semi finals to the third tier in 4 years being promoted to chief football officer? I wish my job was so generous if you ****ed up this badly.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...